Type: Oral
Session: 615. Acute Myeloid Leukemias: Clinical and Epidemiological: Genetic Markers and Outcomes in AML
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Clinical Research, Real-world evidence
Methods: We analyzed a cohort of NRASMT and KRASMT AML patients treated at Karmanos Cancer Center from 2016-23, data from cBioPortal (Cerami et al., 2012), AACR GENIE (v 16.0), and a cohort of various sub-studies (Awada et al., Blood 2021, Kewan et al., Nat. Com., 2023). We analyzed the molecular data in the context of overall survival (OS), clinical parameters, coexisting mutations, karyotype, AML subtypes, and RNA-seq expression data. Chi-square and t-tests for univariate statistics, and Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods for OS were used.
Results: From a total of 18,200 adult AML cases, 4,132 eligible patients were separated into 4 cohorts: 1433 (35%) with NRASMT/KRASWT, 781 (19%) with NRASWT/KRASMT, 128 (3%) with NRASMT/ KRASMT, and 1790 (43%) with NRASWT/ KRASWT. The median age of the double-mutated cohort was 67 ys. [25.2-85], compared to the NRASMT and KRASMT cohorts at 63.6 and 65.5 ys. [23-85 ys. p=0.01; vs 27-85 ys. p=0.04 resp.]. Females were more represented in the co-mutated cohort than NRASMT and KRASMT AML [61% vs 25% and 43%; p =<0.001, <0.001]. Abnormal karyotype enriched the NRASMT cohort more than the KRASMT cohort [54% vs 27%, p =<0.001], whereas normal karyotype was more prominent in the double mutated cohort [45% vs 28% and 31%; p =<0.001 and 0.0243 resp.]. FLT3-ITDNEG status dominated all cohorts; KRASMT and the double-mutated cohorts had similar FLT3-ITDNEG mutants [58% vs 55%, p =0.59], and NRASMT AML had the highest FLT3-ITDPOS hits (14%). All cohorts were profoundly hyperproliferative in bone marrow blast response (47% vs 46.5% vs 48.5%). The degree of pancytopenia was comparable in NRASMT, KRASMT and double mutant patients.
The double mutated cohort had the highest OS compared to NRASMT, and KRASMT patients [31.6 mo. vs 21.2 mo. vs 19.2 mo., p=<0.001 and 0.02 resp.]. Most of the NRASMT patients had G12 S/A/C (42%) or G13 D/R/V/C (24%) canonical hits, whereas most of the KRASMT patients had G12 D/V/A (53%) or G13 D/R/C (25%) mutations. In terms of co-mutational profile, the NRASMT cohort was uniquely enriched in NPM1 (50%) and DNMT3A (41%), whereas the KRASMT cohort was enriched in worse prognosticating myelodysplasia related gene mutations such as ASXL1 (14%), U2AF1 (10%) and STAG2 (8%).
To define a RAS-like signature, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from KRASMT, NRASMT, and double-mutated patients were collated. The expression levels were normalized, and the top 20 genes (out of 35 total) with expression z-scores > 2.0 (termed high expressors) were selected. We examined the presence of high expressors in KRASWT and NRASWT patient profiles using Elastic Net regularization and found that a RAS-like gene signature based on DNMT3A, CALR, CNPY3, PTPRC, and PTPN11 mutations was highly correlated with gene expression similar to KRASMT and NRASMT patients (Spearman correlation coefficient > 0.85).
Conclusion: While NRASMT and KRASMT may not independently affect prognosis, the patterns of cooperativity with other driver mutations may causally influence disease progression and treatment of myeloid malignancies. Double mutant RAS conveying a better prognosis needs further investigation possibly supporting using a pan RAS inhibitor for translational applications. The presence of a RAS-like signature in wildtype patients further highlights more shared components based on the leukemic disease biology in the RAS gene family and beyond. Ongoing work is focused on using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to rigorously qualify DEGs, dissect the shared transcriptional programming for further preclinical evaluation and identify other therapeutic vulnerabilities in the same pathway.
Disclosures: Yang: Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Puretech: Research Funding. Balasubramanian: Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Alexion AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau.