-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

888 Quality of Life in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Improves after Minimal Residual Disease-Guided Treatment with Ibrutinib Plus Venetoclax

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Type: Oral
Session: 642. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Clinical and Epidemiological: Treating Refractory Disease-Novel Agents and Quality-of-Life
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Clinical trials, Research, Combination therapy, Clinical Research, Patient-reported outcomes, Treatment Considerations, Measurable Residual Disease
Monday, December 9, 2024: 4:00 PM

Laura Elisabeth Maria Eurelings, MD, PhD1,2*, Emelie Curovic Rotbain, MD, PhD3*, Sabina Kersting, MD, PhD4*, Lina Van Der Straten5*, Lisbeth Enggaard6*, Gerrit Jan Veldhuis, MD7*, Rogier Mous, MD PhD8*, Christian Bjørn Poulsen, MD, PhD9*, Henrik Frederiksen, MD, PhD10, Ann Janssens, MD11*, Ida Schjoedt6*, Ellen C Dompeling12*, Juha Ranti, MD13*, Christian Brieghel, MD, PhD14*, Mattias Mattsson, MD15*, Mar Bellido, MD, PhD16*, Hoa T Tran, MD, PhD17*, Claudia A M Stege, MD, PhD18*, Kazem Nasserinejad, PhD19,20*, Arnon P. Kater, MD, PhD21, Carsten Utoft Niemann, MD, PhD3* and Mark-David Levin22

1Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, Netherlands
2Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Barendrecht, Netherlands
3Department of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
4Department of Hematology, Haga Ziekenhuis, Den Haag, Netherlands
5Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
6Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, DNK
7Department of Hematology, Antonius Ziekenhuis, Sneek, Netherlands
8Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Amsterdam, Netherlands
9Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
10Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, DNK
11University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
12Isala Ziekenhuis, Zwolle, NLD
13Department of Hematology, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland
14Department of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, København Ø, Denmark
15Department of Hematology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
16University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
17Akershus University Hospital, LøRenskog, NOR
18Department of Hematology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
19Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
20HOVON foundation, Rotterdam, Netherlands
21Dept of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
22Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands

Introduction: Improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a critical treatment objective for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) due to its incurable nature. The HOVON 141/Vision trial has demonstrated high efficacy for MRD-guided, time-limited treatment with ibrutinib plus venetoclax (IV) in patients with relapsed or refractory (RR) CLL. However, data on the impact of MRD-guided IV on HRQoL remain limited.

Methods: Assessment of HRQoL in patients with RR CLL was conducted within the framework of the HOVON 141/Vision study as a pre-planned analysis. RR CLL patients were treated with IV for 15 cycles. In patients with detectable MRD (≥10-4), I was continued, while patients with undetectable MRD (uMRD in blood and bone marrow, < 10-4) were randomized 1:2 for I maintenance or treatment cessation. Upon MRD recurrence in the treatment cessation arm, IV was reinitiated followed by I maintenance (Niemann 2024).

Changes in functioning scales, global health status (GHS)/QoL, and symptoms were assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CLL16 questionnaires, completed at baseline, the end of IV (cycle 15), and at 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years after cycle 15. Minimal important differences (MID) were used to determine whether changes in scores are clinically meaningful. MIDs were calculated using a distribution-based approach (van der Straten, Blood 2023).

Results: 224 patients completed at least one questionnaire and were included in the analysis. At baseline, the mean GHS of the full cohort was 66. After 15 cycles of IV, the majority of patients reported clinically relevant improvement (positive change in score >8, the MID) or stable GHS (change between +8 and -8) (44% and 41% respectively), while 15% showed a clinically relevant decrease in GHS (negative change in score >8, the MID). A clinically relevant improvement in the mean GHS was observed after 15 cycles of IV (+10; 95% CI +7 to +13). Similarly, a clinically relevant decrease in future health concerns was observed (-12; 95% CI -8 to -16). After induction treatment, 72 patients with uMRD were randomly assigned to a treatment group, 24 to ibrutinib maintenance (uMRD I) and 48 to treatment cessation (uMRD cessation). The remaining patients continued with ibrutinib monotherapy (I continuation). One year after the end of induction (EOIT) treatment, the majority of patients reported a clinically relevant improvement or stable GHS: 24% and 57% for uMRD I, 22% and 65% for uMRD cessation, and 21% and 64% for I continuation.

In the full cohort, 6 months after induction treatment, a clinically relevant improvement was seen in the GHS (+11; 95% CI 8 to 14), fatigue (-12; 95% -9 to -15), disease-related symptoms (-12; 95% CI -10 to -14), and future health worries (-17; 95% CI -13 to -21) compared to baseline. These effects persisted up until 3 years after the EOIT. A transient increase in treatment-related symptoms and diarrhea was observed at the EOIT (+8; 95% CI 5 to 11 and +14; 95% CI 10 to 18 respectively). However, these symptom scores returned to the baseline scores 6 months after the EOIT in each treatment group.

Clinically relevant improvements were observed 1 year after the end of IV compared to baseline for GHS (+9), role functioning (+16), emotional functioning (+9), cognitive functioning (+7), and future health worries (-17) in the uMRD I arm. In the uMRD cessation arm, improvements were observed for GHS (+11), fatigue (-14), disease-related symptoms (-12), and future health worries (-15). In the I continuation arm improvements were observed for GHS (+12), physical functioning (+6), role functioning (+11), fatigue (-15), dyspnea (-15), disease-related symptoms (-14), and future health worries (-17).

Conclusion: MRD-guided treatment with IV significantly improves HRQoL for RR CLL and mitigates fatigue, disease-related symptoms, and health concerns. These effects are durable, lasting for at least three years after end of induction treatment with IV. The clinically relevant improvements in GHS and health concerns are seen in patients continuing ibrutinib, as well as after cessation. Overall, MRD-guided IV therapy confers substantial HRQoL benefits in RR CLL, in addition to the previously documented high efficacy of IV MRD-guided time-defined treatment.

Disclosures: Eurelings: Abbvie: Research Funding. Rotbain: Abbvie: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ranti: Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Consultancy. Brieghel: AbbVie, Janssen: Honoraria. Bellido: Janssen: Other: Financial Departmental Contribution for Educational Purposes; Amgen: Other: Financial Contribution to Attend Workshop. Tran: AbbVie: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Stege: Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kater: LAVA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Patents planned, issued or pending; Steering Committee; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Patents planned, issued or pending; Steering Committee, Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Steering Committee, Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Niemann: CSL Behring, Genmab, Takeda, Beigene, MSD, Lilly: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; AbbVie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Octapharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Levin: Janssen, AbbVie: Other: Travel.

<< Previous Abstract | Next Abstract
*signifies non-member of ASH