-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

2892 Optimizing Venetoclax Duration in Combination with Hypomethylating Agents for Newly Diagnosed AML: Impact on Treatment Response and Survival Outcomes

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 617. Acute Myeloid Leukemias: Commercially Available Therapies: Poster II
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Clinical Research, Health outcomes research, Real-world evidence, Treatment Considerations
Sunday, December 8, 2024, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM

Anush Aram Ginosyan, MD1*, Karam Ashouri, MD2, Lucas Humayun2*, Lauren Ford2*, Mihir Baya2*, Hee-Jung Hong2*, Elaine Huang2*, Brian Hom2*, Yekta Ashtiani, MD2*, Brandon Ann2*, Robert Ireland, MD2*, Shilpa Mantri, MD2*, Sydney Greenlee2*, Imran Siddiqi, MD, PhD3*, Amir Ali, PharmD, BCOP4, Karrune Woan, MD, PhD5*, Abdullah Ladha, MD5*, Eric L. Tam, MD5* and George Yaghmour, MD5

1Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Chatsworth, CA
2Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
3University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
4Department of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, los angeles, CA
5Jane Anne Nohl Division of Hematology and Center for the study of Blood disease, Division of Hematology, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

Introduction: Venetoclax (ven), combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs), is the preferred treatment for elderly/unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). There is increasing evidence that a shorter duration of ven may be non-inferior, mostly in combination with azacitidine, with the optimal treatment duration still uncertain. Our study evaluates treatment response and survival outcomes in newly diagnosed AML patients receiving shorter durations of ven, with most patients receiving decitabine

Methods: This is a retrospective study of 85 newly diagnosed AML patients treated with HMA+ven at Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2018-2024. Cytogenetic and molecular studies were performed using conventional karyotype and next-generation sequencing, respectively. The response was assessed according to the 2022 ELN criteria. The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was evaluated using competing risk regression (Fine-Gray method), with death as a competing outcome. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results: Our patients (median age 69 years, 63.5% male, 64.7% de novo) received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-28) of azacitidine (n=21) or decitabine (n=64) with ven. Ven duration varied: 14-day (n=11), 21-day (n=43), or 28-day course (n=31). ELN 2022 risk included favorable (19.0%, n=16), intermediate (19.0%, n=16), or adverse (61.9%, n=52). Nearly half of the patients had a normal karyotype (n=38, 48.1%) followed by complex (n=23, 29.1%) and monosomal (n=13, 16.5%), while the most common cytogenetic abnormalities were del(5q) (n=12, 18.8%), del(7q) (n=10, 12.5%), MLLT3::KMT2A (n=4, 6.2%), RUNX1::RUNX1T1 (n=4, 6.2%), and CBFB::MYH11 (n=3, 4.7%). Frequent mutations included TP53 (27.2%, n=22), TET2 (18.5%, n=15), K/NRAS (18.5%, n=15), NPM1 (17.3%, n=14), RUNX1 (16.0%, n=13), DNMT3A (16.0%, n=13), ASXL1 (14.8%, n=12), SRSF2 (14.8%, n=12), IDH2 (13.6%, n=11), U2AF1 (9.9%, n=8), WT1 (9.9%, n=8), PTPN11 (8.6%, n=7), BCOR (8.6%, n=7), KMT2A (7.4%, n=6), CEBPA (7.4%, n=6), JAK2 (7.4%, n=6), FLT3-ITD (4.9%, n=4), and IDH1 (2.5%, n=2).

Complete remission (CR or CRi) occurred in 55.3% of patients, and 70.7% achieved MRD negativity at CR. Age at diagnosis, race, sex, ELN criteria, extramedullary disease, and CR rates did not differ with ven duration, but the diagnosis of de novo AML did (14 days: 27.3% vs. 21 days: 72.1% vs. 28 days: 67.7%, p=0.027). The 21-day cohort had the lowest refractory disease rate (14 days: 27.3% vs. 21 days: 14.0% vs. 28 days: 38.7%, p=0.045) and the shortest median time to MRD negativity (14 days: 1.1 months (mo) vs. 21 days: 0.8 mo vs. 28 days: 1.8 mo, p=0.029).

Median OS was 15.7 mo (95% CI 13.1-25.1) with 43 deaths, and a 1-year CIR of 42.9% (29.0-56.1%). Compared to 21 days of ven, the 14-day group had shorter OS (HR 3.08, 95% CI 1.10-8.59, p=0.032, 6.1 mo vs. 17.6 mo) and increased CIR (HR 6.56, 95% CI 2.37-18.2, p<0.001), while the 28-day group had similar OS (HR 1.31, p=0.41, 15.7 mo vs. 17.6 mo) and CIR (HR 1.39, p=0.40). Univariate analysis showed adverse ELN risk group (HR 4.37, 95% CI 1.5-12.7, p=0.007), complex karyotype (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.26-4.98, p=0.009), positive MRD status at CR (HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.33-6.98, p=0.008), TP53 mutation (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.28-4.89, p=0.008), and del(5q) (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.04-5.35, p=0.040) as predictors of worse OS, while NPM1 mutation (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.47, p=0.001) conferred improved OS. Predictors of worse CIR included positive MRD at CR (HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.34-7.93, p=0.009) and TP53 mutation (HR 3.27, 95% CI 1.40-7.63, p=0.006), while NPM1 mutations improved CIR (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.59, p=0.006). Controlling for ELN and NPM1 mutations, 14-day ven continued to have worse CIR (HR 3.89, 95% CI 1.40-10.8, p=0.009) but not OS (HR 2.54, p=0.11).

Conclusions: In our study, a 21-day venetoclax regimen was associated with lower rates of refractory disease, shorter time to MRD negativity, and improved CIR. Adverse ELN risk group, positive MRD status, and TP53 mutations were significant predictors of worse outcomes, while NPM1 mutations were associated with improved OS and CIR. These findings underscore the importance of tailoring venetoclax treatment duration and considering genetic and molecular profiles to optimize therapeutic efficacy in newly diagnosed AML patients.

Disclosures: Siddiqi: Recordati Rare Diseases: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Ali: Johnson & Johnson: Speakers Bureau. Tam: University of Southern California: Current Employment. Yaghmour: USC Keck School of Medicine: Current Employment; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi: Other: Advisory Board; Astazeneca: Other: Advisory Board; GSK: Speakers Bureau; Rigel: Speakers Bureau; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Kite: Speakers Bureau; SOBI: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Secura Bio: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Blueprint: Speakers Bureau; ABBVie: Speakers Bureau; Stemline therapeutic: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Other: consult.

*signifies non-member of ASH