Session: 618. Acute Myeloid Leukemias: Biomarkers and Molecular Markers in Diagnosis and Prognosis: Poster I
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Translational Research
Genome and transcriptome data obtained through a combination of whole genome, transcriptome, targeted capture, and Archer sequencing was interrogated for RAS mutations. Survival analysis was performed in R (v4.3.2).
In a cohort of 2041 patients, 722 (35.3%) patients had NRAS or KRAS mutations: 548 (26.8%) NRAS and 240 (11.8%) KRAS. 66 (9.1%) had mutations in both genes. 54 (7.5%) of those with RAS mutations had mutations in 2 different codons: 10 G12+G13, 16 G12+Q61, 15 G13+Q61, and 14 non-canonical pairings. Within NRAS mutations, 39 (7.1%) patients had mutations in 2 different codons: 6 G12+G13, 12 G12+Q61, 14 G13+Q61, and 7 non-canonical pairings. 16 (6.7%) patients with KRAS mutations had mutations in 2 different codons: 4 G12+G13, 4 G12+Q61, 1 G13+Q61, and 7 non-canonical pairings. Interrogation of whole genome and transcriptome sequencing data demonstrated that the two mutations were always in different sequencing reads, suggesting bi-allelic vs. multi-clonality as the underlying mechanism.
Outcome evaluation for patients with RAS mutations demonstrated 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of 26% for those with single-gene double mutations vs. that of 49% for those with single mutations, which were identical to wild-type (WT) (p<0.03). Of the 548 NRAS mutants, double mutants had an EFS of 35% vs. that of 47% for the single mutants and 48% for NRAS WT (p=0.22). Of the 240 KRAS mutants, EFS for double mutants was 7% vs. that of 40% for single and 49% for KRAS WT (p=0.001). For either RAS gene, codon pairing did not impact survival (p=0.51 NRAS, p=0.26 KRAS).
The significance of single-gene double mutations was interrogated in KMT2A-rearranged AML (KMT2A-r) cases. Of the 371 KMT2A-r cases, 106 (28.6%) had NRAS mutations and 93 (25.1%) had KRAS mutations. All KMT2A-r patients with single-gene double RAS mutations (n=16) relapsed by 2.1 years, compared to an EFS of 30% for single mutants and 35% in those with no RAS mutations (p=0.003). Among NRAS mutants, all double mutants (n=10, 9.4%) relapsed by 1.3 years, compared to an EFS of 44% for single mutants and 46% for NRAS WT. Among KRAS mutants, all double mutants (n=7, 7.5%) relapsed by 2.1 years, compared to an EFS of 25% for single mutants and 40% for WT (p=0.0025).
Bi-allelic mutations would lead to lack of normal RAS function and resultant haplo-insufficiency. We reasoned a RAS mutation in the setting of a LOH may result in similar phenotype. As LOH would lead to allelic imbalance and high variant allele frequency (VAF), we identified 16 cases with a single RAS mutation with VAF >60%. Whole genome sequencing of DNA from a case with high VAF NRAS mutation demonstrated copy-neutral LOH of 1P as the underlying mechanism of allelic imbalance. Patients with RAS mutations with high VAF had an EFS of 25%, similar to those with single-gene double mutations. In combination, patients with single-gene double RAS mutations or with high VAF constitute 10% of RAS mutants and provide significant clinical information. We validated the association of haplo-insufficiency with outcome in the adult BeatAML data (n=942), where patients with single-gene double RAS mutations or with high VAF had an overall survival of 10%, similar to our observation in younger patients.
We demonstrate that single-gene, double, likely bi-allelic RAS mutations or associated LOH have adverse outcomes in AML. Presence of such haplo-insufficient RAS variants are particularly important in KMT2A-r, where they all relapse. Despite history of therapeutic failures of RAS inhibitors in RAS mutant AML, this observation brings into question whether only those with haplo-insufficient RAS are uniquely susceptible to RAS inhibitors.
Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.