-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1456 Age-Related Prognoses of Genetic Subtypes in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia/Lymphoma (B-ALL): Insights from a Decade of National Data

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 614. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemias: Biomarkers, Molecular Markers, and Minimal Residual Disease in Diagnosis and Prognosis: Poster I
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Lymphoid Leukemias, ALL, Adult, Epidemiology, Elderly, Clinical Research, Genomics, Pediatric, Diseases, Neonatal, Registries, Lymphoid Malignancies, Young adult , Biological Processes, Study Population, Human
Saturday, December 7, 2024, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM

Ting Zhou, MD, PhD1*, Nicholas J. Short, MD2, Nitin Jain, MD2, Keyur P. Patel, MD, PhD3*, Elias Jabbour, MD2, Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD2, L. Jeffrey Medeiros, MD3 and Bryan Iorgulescu, MD, MPH, FCAP4*

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
3Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
4Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal rearrangements and aneuploidies are genetic hallmarks of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL) and greatly impact diagnosis, risk-stratification, and treatment. However, despite advances in treatment, overall survival (OS) for older patients with B-ALL remains poor, with the 5-yr OS dropping from >90% in children to <30% in older adults. This age-related decline in OS is poorly understood and has been attributed in part to the distributions of genetic subtypes in different age groups. To address this issue, we used a decade of U.S. data to investigate whether the prognoses of different genetic subgroups also depend on patient age.

METHODS: Patients diagnosed with B-ALL between 2010-2021 were identified from the National Cancer Database, which captures >63% of leukemia diagnoses in the U.S. and includes 7 B-ALL genetic subtypes: BCR::ABL1, ETV6::RUNX1, (high) hyperdiploidy, KMT2A rearrangement, hypodiploidy, TCF3::PBX1, and IGH::IL3. Age was categorized as: infant (<1 y); toddler (1-2 y); early- (3-5 y), mid- (6-11 y), and late-childhood (12-14 y); adolescent and young adult (AYA; 15-39 y); mid- (40-65 y), and late-adulthood (66-90+ y). OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier techniques and compared using Cox regression. p<0.005 was considered significant.

RESULTS: 35,694 patients with B-ALL were identified, including 4,716 with subtype data: BCR::ABL1 (n=2,594), ETV6::RUNX1 (n=624), high hyperdiploidy (n=581), KMT2A rearrangement (n=375), hypodiploidy (n=369), TCF3::PBX1 (n=133), or IGH::IL3 (n=40). B-ALL with TCF3::PBX1 displayed a unique race/ethnicity distribution: 15.2% arose in non-Hispanic Black patients and 23.5% arose in Hispanic patients, compared to 7.7% and 16.5% of non-TCF::PBX1 subtypes, respectively (X2 p=0.001). Conversely, 52.3% of TCF3::PBX1 occurred in non-Hispanic White patients, compared to 67.6% of non-TCF::PBX1 subtypes.

B-ALL with BCR::ABL1 arose primarily during mid adulthood (50% of cases), followed by late adulthood (25% of cases). Likewise, hypodiploidy and IGH:IL3 were more common in AYA through adulthood. Conversely, ETV6::RUNX1 and hyperdiploidy were most common in early childhood. Overall, patients with B-ALL with ETV6::RUNX1 experienced the best 5-yr OS (90.3%, 95CI: 87.1-92.8), followed by hyperdiploidy (81.6%, 95CI: 77.8-84.9), TCF3::PBX1 (79.1, 95CI: 69.8-85.9), and IGH::IL3 (71.4%, 95CI: 51.8-84.1). By contrast, the 5-yr OS was 53.4% for hypodiploidy (95CI: 47.3-59.0), 52.8% for BCR::ABL1 (95CI: 50.4-55.1), and 50.8% for KMT2A rearrangement (95CI: 44.9-56.4).

Notably, across all 7 genetic subtypes of B-ALL, a consistent trend emerged: irrespective of genetic subtype, the OS of patients declined with age. For instance, although the 5-yr OS overall for B-ALL with BCR::ABL1 was 52.8% (95CI: 50.4-55.1), it ranged from 31.3% in late adulthood (95CI: 26.9-35.8) to 72.2% in AYA (95CI: 67.1-76.7) and remarkably reached 100% in the rare toddlerhood/early childhood cases (n=41; 95CI: n/a). Conversely, although the 5-yr OS overall for B-ALL with ETV6::RUNX1 was 90.3% (95CI: 87.1-92.8), it declined from 97.1% in early childhood (95CI: 92.9-98.9) to 14.1% in rare cases arising in adulthood (n=40; 95CI: 3.4-32.0). Consistently across genetic subtypes, the worst OS was experienced by patients presenting in adulthood, including after adjusting for treatments. These trends differed somewhat in patients with KMT2A rearrangements: toddlerhood/early childhood displayed the highest 5-yr OS (81.8%; 95CI: 67.8-90.1) and late adulthood displayed the shortest 5-yr OS (24.4%; 95CI: 12.9-37.8); whereas infants exhibited an intermediate 5-yr OS (55.5%; 95CI: 38.8-69.4).

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal that the prognosis of B-ALL patients depends on age irrespective of genetic subtype, likely related to poor tolerance of chemoimmunotherapy in older patients. Additionally, using national data, we define the age-specific prognosis estimates within genetic subtypes of B-ALL and we identify a unique race/ethnicity distribution of B-ALL with TCF3::PBX1. This study emphasizes the importance of integrating age and genetic information into prognostic assessment and treatment planning for patients with B-ALL to improve outcomes across all age groups.

Disclosures: Short: Pfizer Inc.: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; NextCure: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Autolus: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; BeiGene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Jain: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; MEI Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Aprea Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Cellectis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; CareDx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Ipsen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Dialectic Therapeutics: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; Medisix: Research Funding; MingSight: Honoraria, Research Funding; Newave: Research Funding; NovalGen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; TransThera Sciences: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding. Jabbour: AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Ascentage Pharma Group, Pfizer, Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, BMS, Genentech, Incyte, Pfizer, Takeda: Consultancy. Kantarjian: AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, KAHR Medical, Novartis, Pfizer, Shenzhen Target Rx, Stemline,Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.

*signifies non-member of ASH