-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1796 Bomedemstat (MK3543) in Combination with Ruxolitinib in Patients with Advanced Myelofibrosis

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 634. Myeloproliferative Syndromes: Clinical and Epidemiological: Poster I
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Clinical trials, Research, Clinical Research
Saturday, December 7, 2024, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM

Harinder Gill, MBBS, MD, FRCP (Edin, Glasg, Lond), FRCPath, FHKCP, FHKAM (Medicine)1, Lester Au1*, Dorothy Tsai1*, Rita Yim, PhD1*, Vivian Li1*, Paul Lee, PhD1*, Lynn Chin1*, Qi Zhang, MD1*, Garret Man Kit Leung, MBBS, FHKCP, FHKAM1*, Tony Kwun Yat Wu, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FHKCP, FHKAM1* and Hugh Young Rienhoff Jr., MD2

1Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
2Imago BioSciences, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ

Background

Approximately 50% of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) discontinue ruxolitinib after 3 years, mostly due to disease progression, suboptimal response or cytopenia. Outcome after ruxolitinib discontinuation is poor with a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 14 months. Lysine-specific demethylase-1 (LSD1) is a histone demethylase critical for self-renewal of malignant hematopoietic stem cells and for maturation of progenitor cells. Bomedemstat is an oral LSD1 inhibitor clinically active in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and has shown clinical activity as a single-agent in patients with MF.

Aims

This is an ongoing, open-label, Phase 2 study of the combination of bomedemstat and ruxolitinib in treatment-naïve patients with MF or those with a sub-optimal response to ruxolitinib. The objectives of this are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination, the optimal dosing of bomedemstat in this regimen, and to assess the efficacy of the combination as assessed by spleen size reduction and symptom reduction using the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF).

Methods

Cohort A is comprised of patients with a sub-optimal response to an adequate trial of ruxolitinib defined as splenomegaly not reduced by >35% from baseline or symptoms scores that have not improved by >50%. Cohort A patients must have been on a stable dose of ruxolitinib for ≥8wks. Cohort B is comprised of treatment-naïve patients with MF who require treatment per guidelines. Patients in Cohort A remain on the entry dose of ruxolitinib while Cohort B patients received a starting ruxolitinib dose of 10 mg twice per day throughout the study. All patients received concomitantly, a starting dose of bomedemstat of 0.4mg/kg/d. Dose adjustments up were allowed every 4 weeks to achieve a target platelet count of 50 x 109/L. Down titrations could be made at any time in the interest of patient safety.

Results

Between 1 December 2022 to 31 December 2023, 24 men and 19 women with a median age of 64 (range: 47-81) years were enrolled. Case distribution was PMF, N=26 (60.5%); PPV-MF, N=10 (23.3%); and PET-MF, N=7 (16.3%). Mutational profile of driver genes was JAK2V617F, N=33 (76.7%); JAK2 exon 12, N=1 (2.3%); and CALR mutations, N=8 (18.6%). Six patient (14%) harbored high-molecular risk (HMR) mutations (ASXL, N=4; EZH2, N=2). At enrollment, the mean (standard error) white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin (Hb), platelet count, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were 12.83 x 109/L (1.61), 9.7 g/dL (0.3), 317 x 109/L (36) and 607 IU/L (63), respectively. Ten patients (23.3%), 23 patients (53.5%) and 10 patients (23.3%) belonged to the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) high, intermediate-2 and intermediate-1 risk categories, respectively. Thirty patients and 13 patients were enrolled in Cohort A and Cohort B respectively.

At the data cut-off of 30 June 2024, the median duration of ruxolitinib + bomedemstat was 61.7 (range: 27.4-80.4) weeks. In 40 evaluable patients at Week 24, 11 patients (27.5%) had ≥50% reduction in MF-SAF Total Symptom Score (TSS) (Cohort A: 7/27, 25.9%; Cohort B: 4/13, 30.7%) and 7 patients (17.5%) had ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR) (Cohort A: 2/27, 7.4%; Cohort B: 5/13, 38.5%). At Week 24, 20 patients (50%) had stable (≤ 1g/dL absolute change in Hb) or improved Hb (Cohort A: 14/27, 51.9%; Cohort B: 6/13, 46.3%).

The most common non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea, N=13 (30.2%) (Grade 1-2, N=12; Grade 3-4, N=1); edema, N=11 (25.5%) (Grade 1-2, N=11; Grade 3-4, N=0) malaise, N=9 (20.9) (Grade 1-2, N= 9; Grade 3-4, N=0); and dysgeusia, N=7 (16.2) (Grade 1-2, N=7; Grade 3-4, N=0). There were no safety signals, or deaths related to drug. Updated data on exploratory outcomes including changes in mutant allele frequencies (MAF) of driver gene mutations, cytokine profiles and bone marrow fibrosis will be presented.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the addition of bomedemstat to a ruxolitinib regimen is well tolerated, improves splenomegaly and symptom scores, and stabilizes hemoglobin both in the frontline and second-line setting.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05569538

Disclosures: Gill: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Conference Support; Lecture fees, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Lecture fees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees, Research Funding; Jacobson Pharma Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Conference Support; Lecture fees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Conference Support; Lecture fees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Conference Support, Research Funding; PharmaEssentia Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Conference Support, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy, Other: Conference Support; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imago Biosciences: Research Funding. Rienhoff: Merck: Ended employment in the past 24 months.

*signifies non-member of ASH