Session: 618. Acute Myeloid Leukemias: Biomarkers and Molecular Markers in Diagnosis and Prognosis: Poster III
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Clinical Research, Real-world evidence, Registries
We analyzed 1888 adult AML patients (51% female, median age 57 years; range 18-78 years) with ELN 2022 intermediate- or poor-risk cytogenetics and known DNMT3A, FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutation status, who received their first allo-HCT in CR1 between 2015 and 2022. Of these, 862 (46%) patients had DNMT3Amutation. Those with DNMT3A mutations were less likely to have a secondary AML (14% versus (vs.) 24%, p<0.001) or poor-risk karyotype (9% vs. 25%, p<0.001), but more likely to be female (57% vs. 46%, p<0.001), have normal cytogenetics (75% vs. 52%, p<0.001), FLT3-ITD co-mutation (51% vs. 25%, p<0.001), NPM1 co-mutation (59% vs. 19%, p<0.001), and to receive a myeloablative conditioning and in vivo T cell depletion. Outcome analysis was stratified by baseline karyotype (normal or abnormal).
In the cohort of 1177 patients with normal cytogenetics, 645 (55%) patients had DNMT3A mutations. After a median follow up of 2 years, the 2-year relapse incidence (RI), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and overall survival (OS) was 23%, 63% and 70% respectively, for patients with DNMT3A mutations, compared to 18%, 68% and 74% for those without such mutations. Multivariable analyses (MVA) were conducted within four groups based on FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations. Among 444 patients with both FLT3-ITD and NPM1mutations, 340 were triple-positive (77%); there were no significant differences in 2-year RI (25% vs. 24%, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02, p= 0.95), LFS (61% vs. 64%, HR: 1.1, p=0.67) or OS (70% vs. 76%, HR: 1.56, p=0.11) with and without DNMT3A mutations. Conversely, among 167 patients with NPM1 mutation without FLT3-ITD, the 2-year RI was 17% for 106 patients with DNMT3A mutations and 8% for those without (HR 2.77: p=0.05), leading to significantly lower 2-year LFS (70% vs. 90%, HR: 3.3, p=0.006), but OS was not significantly different (80% vs. 90%, HR: 2.5, p=0.06). On the other hand, among 441 with wild-type (wt) NPM1 and without FLT3-ITD, RI, LFS and OS were not significantly different for 155 patients with DNMT3A mutations compared to 286 patients with DNMT3Awt (2-year RI: 22% vs. 19%, HR: 1.36: p= 0.24; 2-year LFS: 62% vs. 66%, HR: 1.14, p=0.51; 2-year OS: 66% vs. 71%, HR: 1.14, p=0.53). In 125 patients with FLT3-ITD and NPM1wt, RI was significantly higher for 44 patients with DNMT3A mutations (30% vs. 18%, HR: 2.32, p=0.03), although LFS and OS were not significantly different (58% vs. 67%, HR: 1.62, p=0.12; 63% vs 70%, HR: 1.33, p=0.41, respectively).
Finally, among 711 patients with abnormal cytogenetics, 217 (31%) patients had DNMT3A mutations. MVA revealed no significant impact of DNMT3A mutations on RI, LFS or OS. Poor-risk cytogenetics were associated with worse LFS, OS and increased RI. Older age negatively affected LFS and OS.
In conclusion, we have found that triple-positive patients (DNMT3A, NPM1, and FLT3-ITD) are the most frequent, while DNMT3A co-occurrence with either FLT3 or NPM1 mutations alone is less common. The impact of DNMT3A mutations on post-transplant outcomes in AML patients in CR1 varies based on karyotype and co-mutations. DNMT3A mutations negatively affects post-transplant outcomes specifically in patients with normal karyotype and either NPM1 mutation without FLT3-ITD, or FLT3-ITD and NPM1wt. No significant impact was observed in other settings.
Disclosures: Kröger: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Neovii: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Therakos: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; DKMS: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Provirex: Consultancy. Wagner Drouet: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Other: travel grant; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grant. Mayer: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AOP Health: Research Funding; Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA: Research Funding. Ciceri: ExCellThera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bazarbachi: Biologix: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Jansen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Caribou: Honoraria. Mohty: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Stemline Menarini: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MaaT Pharma: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.