Session: 617. Acute Myeloid Leukemias: Biomarkers, Molecular Markers and Minimal Residual Disease in Diagnosis and Prognosis: Poster III
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Clinical Research, real-world evidence
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult AML patients with ASXL1MT/SRSF2MT by screening well-annotated public databases, cBioPortal (Cerami et al., 2012) and AACR GENIE (v 13.1), and expanded with a published metanalytic cohort of various sub-studies from Cleveland Clinic Foundation from 2012-2021 (Awada et al., Blood 2021, Kewan et al., Nature Communications, 2023). We analyzed the NGS data in the context of baseline clinical parameters, coexisting mutations, variant allele frequencies, karyotype, and AML subtypes. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes included survival based on AML subtype, karyotype, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant treatment (HSCT). The chi-square test was used to study various described parameters, and Kaplan-Meir curves were used for survival analyses.
Results: We screened a total of 15,742 adult patients with AML, and 2,471 eligible patients were separated into 3 cohorts: 280 (11.3%) patients with ASXLMT/SRSF2MT, 1,025 (41.5%) patients with ASXLMT/SRSF2WT and 1,166 (47.2%) patients with ASXLWT/SRSF2MT. In addition, three AML subtypes were established: de novo AML (dnAML), secondary AML (sAML), and therapy-associated AML (tAML).
The median age of the co-mutated cohort was 70.1 ys. [range 42-100 ys.], compared to the ASXL1MT [17-100 ys., p=0.0046] and SRSF2MT cohorts [25-99 ys., p=0.5]. Females were more prominently represented in the ASXL1MT cohort compared to the SRSF2MT cohort [47% vs 30%, p<0.0001]. All three cohorts were predominantly enriched by dnAML (69%, 70%, and 67%), the ASXL1MT cohort had the most tAML (2.2%), and sAML enriched the SRSF2MT cohort (31%). Abnormal karyotype enriched the ASXL1MT/SRSF2WT cohort compared to SRSF2MT [50% vs 39%, p=0.0001] and equivalent in ASXL1MT cohorts (50% vs 51%, p=0.06].
Median OS was driven in part by the ASXL1MT clone and lowest for the co-mutated compared to the ASXL1MT [12.0 vs 12.5 mo., p=0.0055] and SRSF2MT cohorts [12.0 vs 17.5 mo., p =<0.0001]. When divided by AML-subtype, dnAML had the lowest median OS in the co-mutated, compared to the ASXL1MT [12 vs 15 mo., p =0.03] and the SRSF2MT cohorts [12 vs 17 mo., p =0.02]. sAML had nearly equivalent survival across all cohorts (10.0 vs 9.3 vs 9.4 mo.), and although tAML offered numerically better survival (NE vs 8.7 vs 17.5 mo.), it was not significant. Normal karyotype offered a numerical survival advantage (NE vs 14.39 vs 16.85 mo.).
The median number of mutations in the co-mutated cohort was 4 (range 3 - 7), Fig 1(A). The most common co-occurring mutations in this cohort were RUNX1 (78%), TET2 (48%), IDH2 (43%), NRAS (16%), and CEBPA (15%). 21 patients were transplant-eligible from the co-mutated cohort, with median OS after HSCT being 33 vs 12 mo. without HCT (p =0.0010), Fig 1 (B).
Conclusions: ASXL1/SRSF2 co-mutated patients represent a unique chromatin-spliceosome signature, most prominently in de novo AML, associated with a significantly lower OS. Therefore, it must be identified at diagnosis for improved prognostic assessment and potential therapeutic implications. HSCT can provide longer-term survival in these patients. This represents the largest reported cohort of patients with ASXL1/SRSF2 co-mutated AML. Further studies are warranted to validate the chromatin-spliceosome signature and prognosis.
Disclosures: Maciejewski: Regeneron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Omeros: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Balasubramanian: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Other: Drug supply for research; Kura Oncology: Research Funding.