-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

570 Bleeding and Thrombotic Outcomes in Adults with Cancer-Associated Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Type: Oral
Session: 332. Thrombosis and Anticoagulation: Clinical and Epidemiological: Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (CHIP) and Cancer Associated Thrombosis (CAT): Understanding Risk as a Potential Means to Improve Patient Care
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Bleeding and Clotting, Research, adult, health outcomes research, Clinical Research, thromboembolism, Diseases, Human, Study Population
Sunday, December 10, 2023: 5:45 PM

Michael Andersen Jr., MD1, Maria J. Fernandez Turizo, MD2, Laura Dodge, ScD3*, Charles Hsu, MD4*, Kevin Barnum, MD, PhD5*, Jeffrey I. Zwicker, MD6 and Rushad Patell, MBBS5

1Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
2Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Brookline, MA
3Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
4Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
5Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
6Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Introduction:

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) can arise as a complication in patients with underlying cancers, especially gastrointestinal malignancies, as well as other comorbidities such as liver disease. In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis, thrombocytopenia is a common co-occurrence that can complicate management decisions around anticoagulation. Data on the optimal management of SVT in patients with malignancies is limited, and the risk of bleeding and recurrent thrombosis in patients with cancer-associated SVT and thrombocytopenia is unclear.

Methods:

We identified patients with radiographic diagnosis of cancer-associated SVT at our institution between 2010 and 2021. Exclusion criteria included squamous and basal cell carcinomas and myeloproliferative neoplasms. We manually reviewed all medical records to determine baseline clinical data and clinical outcomes. We performed log-binomial regression to identify independent risk factors for major bleeding, using age at thrombosis (continuous), gender, prior major bleed, baseline creatinine (continuous), use of antiplatelets, and use of anticoagulants as covariates. We present these data as adjusted risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We subsequently used Cox models with inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores for thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 100,000/uL within 15 days before or after diagnosis of SVT) to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for our outcomes of interest. Independent variables used in propensity scoring included all variables included in the adjusted models plus type of cancer (hematologic, solid tumor). Outcomes included major bleeding, clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNMB), clinically relevant bleeding (major bleeding + CRNMB), progression and recurrence of SVT, and development of usual-site VTE (DVT or PE) up to one year following the initial SVT. Progression was defined as extension of the thrombus contiguously into a new vein, and recurrence was defined as a new interval thrombus which was non-contiguous with the initial thrombus.

Results:

A total of 581 patients with cancer and SVT were identified. Baseline demographics, clinical history, laboratory data, and details of SVT are shown in Table 1. Of note, 44.2% of patients had cirrhosis, and the most common cancer types were hepatobiliary (55.2%) and pancreatic (22.0%); 40.7% of patients had metastatic disease. Of 512 patients with available platelet count data, 39.5% of patients had platelet count <100,000/uL; of these 512, 14.1% were <75,000/uL, and 12.7% were <50,000/uL. Most (70.6%) SVT were bland thrombi based on radiology interpretation, 19.9% were tumor thrombi, and 5.5% were mixed type, with the remainder being of uncertain etiology. Survival at one year was 41.5%, and median follow-up time was 5.5 months (interquartile range: 1.4–22.2). Only 4.0% of patients received a thrombectomy, and 39.2% were treated with anticoagulation within two weeks of diagnosis.

The cumulative incidence of major bleeding event within one year of SVT diagnosis was 11.0% (95% CI: 8.5–13.5). This was primarily upper GI bleeding (70.3% of major bleeds). Multivariate regression analysis identified only male gender as an independent predictor of major bleeding (aRR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84–0.99), as shown in Table 2. In the propensity score-weighted Cox models, thrombocytopenia was not associated with an increased risk of major bleeding within one year (aHR: 1.65, 95% CI: 0.32–8.41). The cumulative incidence of CRNMB at one year was 6.7% (95% CI: 4.7–8.7), and cumulative incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was 17.7% (95% CI: 14.6–20.8). The cumulative incidence of progression or recurrence of SVT at one year was 16.3% (95% CI: 13.3–19.3). In the weighted Cox models, patients with thrombocytopenia did not impact the risk of progression or recurrence of SVT (aHR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.58–2.26). The cumulative incidence of usual-site VTE at one year was 5.7% (95% CI: 3.8–7.5).

Conclusion:

Thrombocytopenia was a common co-occurrence in cancer-associated SVT. Major bleeding- especially upper GI bleeding- was a common complication of cancer-associated SVT. Recurrent or progressive SVT was also frequent, which highlights the challenges of optimal management in this high-risk population. We found that thrombocytopenia was not an independent risk factor for major bleeding in this population.

Disclosures: Zwicker: CSL Behring: Consultancy; calyx: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation, Quercegen: Research Funding; Sanofi, CSL, Parexel: Consultancy; Pfizer/BMS, Portola, Daiichi: Honoraria.

<< Previous Abstract | Next Abstract
*signifies non-member of ASH