Session: 711. Cell Collection and Processing: Poster I
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Fundamental Science, immunology, Biological Processes, Study Population, Animal model
Methods: C57BL/6 B6 CD45.1 recipient mice were inoculated subcutaneously with 1 x 106 KPC-luc PDAC cell line cells on day -5. Recipient mice received anti-PD1 (200mg) every three days (totaling four doses) and 21 daily s.c. injections of 20 ug ANT308. Splenocytes from three groups of CD45.2+ C57BL/6 donor mice were injected into tumor-bearing recipients: naive mice, mice with a history of KPC regression post-ANT308/anti-PD1 treatment, and mice with progressed KPC tumors without any treatment. Anti-PD1 and ANT308 treatments were initiated simultaneously with adoptive splenocyte infusion (25 x 106 cells) on day 0. Tumor size was measured biweekly, and IVIS imaging was performed weekly. Blood was drawn weekly from recipient mice for flow cytometric analysis of immune cell subsets. A fraction of tumor-bearing recipient mice was euthanized ten days after donor splenocyte infusion and initiation of immune checkpoint therapy or at IAUCAC-defined endpoints. When tumor-bearing mice were euthanized, the spleen, lymph nodes, and tumors were harvested for further flow cytometric analysis. The remaining mice were monitored for tumor growth and survival kinetics.
Results: Contrary to our original hypothesis, we observed substantially lower survival rates and faster tumor growth in the group that received splenocytes from immunologically naive donor mice versus the group treated with splenocytes from tumor-bearing mice (Figures 1A and 1B). Splenocytes from immunologically naive donors contained fewer Treg cells, whereas myeloid-derived suppressor cells (CD11b+Ly-6G+ Gr-1+) were increased in donor splenocytes from tumor-bearing mice. We next repeated the experiment utilizing the adoptive transfer of splenocytes from immunologically naïve donors separated into 8 x 106 MACS-purified T cell or 17 x 106 non-T cell fractions. Remarkably, the transfer of 8 x 106 immunologically naïve T cells abrogated the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy leading to rapid tumor growth compared to tumor regression in mice treated with immune checkpoint therapy without added donor splenocytes or mice that received immune checkpoint therapy with 17 x 106 T-cell-depleted donor splenocytes. Flow cytometric and gene expression analyses of splenocytes from the recipient mice, and those not receiving donor T cell infusions, revealed that the tetramer population in the infusion group was significantly higher than in the group treated only with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Conclusion: Our findings indicated that natural suppressor/ Treg in immunologically naïve splenocytes could exert a profound negative regulatory effect on immune checkpoint therapy's efficacy in a murine PDAC model. Despite having fewer Treg than splenocytes from tumor-bearing donors, immunologically naïve natural Treg had increased potency in suppressing anti-cancer immunity. These findings suggest the importance of the depletion of natural Treg in adoptive cell therapy strategies to treat solid tumor malignancies. This research underscores the critical role of immune contexture in shaping therapeutic outcomes and proposes a novel biomarker for patient stratification in PDAC immunotherapy.
Disclosures: Waller: Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy; CRISPR: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; ORCA: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; NCI R01: Research Funding; Secura: Research Funding; PartnersTherapeutics: Research Funding; Cambium Medical Technologies: Current equity holder in private company, Other: Founder; Cambium Oncology: Current equity holder in private company, Other: Founder.