Type: Oral
Session: 113. Sickle Cell Disease, Sickle Cell Trait and Other Hemoglobinopathies, Excluding Thalassemias: Basic and Translational: Pathophysiology of Sickle Hemoglobinopathies: From Mice to Humans
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Fundamental Science, Sickle Cell Disease, Hemoglobinopathies, Diseases, immunology, Biological Processes
Results: We first sought to determine if caspase-4 activation is upstream of caspase-1 activation. To assess this, we used an imaging-based caspase activation reporter assay. Using this system, we found that siRNA knock-down of caspase-4 in primary human macrophages significantly inhibited heme-induced caspase-1 activation (63.8% vs 26.3%, n =4, p = 0.015). This result shows that caspase-4 is upstream of heme-induced caspase-1 activation and confirmed caspase-4 activation is the initial step in this pathway.
Next, we sought to determine how caspase-4 activation occurs. Other known activators of caspase-4 induce activation by directly binding to caspase-4 and inducing self-oligomerization. To determine if heme acts in a similar manner, we used a published heme-binding prediction algorithm called HeMoQuest. We found multiple predicted heme-binding sites in caspase-4. The dissociation constants for these binding sites are less than 1 µM, suggesting strong binding affinity. Importantly, there are no predicted heme binding sites in caspase-1, indicating caspase-4 is the only direct heme receptor in this pathway. To validate these binding predictions, we performed molecular docking experiments and confirmed there are multiple heme-binding sites in caspase-4. Specifically, we found two heme-binding regions in the p10 catalytic subunit of caspase-4 comprising 2-4 essential residues.
We next confirmed that heme directly interacts with caspase-4 in vitro. Using a pull-down assay with heme conjugated to agarose beads, we observed heme bound to purified caspase-4 and to casapase-4 in macrophage cell-free extracts. Heme did not interact with proteins structurally related to caspase-4 including caspase-1, caspase-7, and caspase-9 and caspase-4 was not pulled down by control agarose. This confirms the specificity of the heme-caspase-4 interaction.
To determine if heme binding to caspase-4 results in activation, we performed native PAGE analysis of purified caspase-4 after exposure to heme. Heme induced formation of a caspase-4 oligomer around 200 kDa in size, four-fold larger than the inactive caspase-4 monomer. Other compounds known to induce IL-1β release from cells, like microbial toxin nigericin, did not induce caspase-4 oligomerization, demonstrating the specificity of heme’s effect on caspase-4.
Conclusions: We have determined that caspase-4 is a direct intracellular heme receptor and that heme exposure leads to caspase-4 activation, which in turn facilitates caspase-1 activation, IL-1β release and cell death. Our future work will elucidate the functional effects of heme binding to caspase-4 in mouse models of sickle cell disease. Caspase-4 is an attractive therapeutic target as it is required for both functional outputs of inflammatory caspase activation, IL-1β release and pyroptosis. Inhibiting heme-caspase-4 interactions would provide a specific way to block the harmful effects of this pathway in patients.
Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts