A Phase 2 Study of Canakinumab in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Background Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) lie on a continuum of myeloid neoplastic progression between clonal hematopoiesis (CH) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β)-induced inflammasome activation is a mechanism of cancer initiation and progression. Given that IL-1β upregulation induces aberrant myeloid differentiation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), we hypothesize that IL-1β plays a critical role in MDS pathogenesis, and targeting IL-1β signaling will overcome aberrant MDS HSPCs' myeloid skewing. Here, we report final results of a phase 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of canakinumab, an IL-1β inhibitor, in patients with lower-risk MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML).

Methods We conducted a single center, open-label phase 2 trial at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Patients aged ≥ 18 with IPSS-R ≤ 3.5 MDS/CMML who have previously been treated were included in the study. Patients received 300 mg of canakinumab on day 1 of a 4-week cycle. The primary objective was to determine the clinical activity of canakinumab in MDS/CMML patients. Response was assessed using the modified International Working Group 2006 criteria for MDS (Cheson et al. 2006). Secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety profile including rate of transfusion independence (TI), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). All patients who received 1 dose of study drug were included in the analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04239157).

Findings Between August 2020 and May 2023, 27 patients were enrolled in the phase 2 portion of this study, and 2 patients failed screening. The median age was 74 years with 15 (60%) male patients; 20 patients (80%) were post-hypomethylating agent failure with a median number of prior lines of therapy of 2 (1-5). Transfusion dependency was observed in 24 patients (96%) prior to canakinumab initiation. Fourteen (56%) patients showed normal karyotype. IPSS-R stratification revealed an intermediate-2 risk in 12 (48%) patients and a high risk in one (4%). The most common mutations were SF3B1 (40%), TET2 (32%), DNMT3A (28%), and RUNX1 (24%). IPSS-M risk score was calculated for 24 cases showing one (4%) very low (VL), four (16%) low (L), 14 (16%) moderate low (ML), eight (32%) moderate high (MH), five (20%) high (H), and two (8%) very high (VH) risk categories. Canakinumab was well tolerated and no drug-related toxicities were observed. One death due to sepsis, which was deemed not treatment-related, occurred on the study drug. Out of 23 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 17·4%, with erythroid and platelet hematological improvement (HI-E and HI-P, respectively) confirmed in 3 (13.0%) patients and 1 (4.3%) patient, respectively. Thirteen patients had stable disease (56·5%) and 6 (26·1%) progressed during therapy, 1 of which transformed to AML (Fig. 1). TI was achieved in 3 patients (median DoR 8·53 months (95% CI 0·41-16·1) and 2 of them maintained TI for over 12 months. With a median follow-up time of 22·6 months (95% CI 15·0-29·4), median OS was 17·3 months (95% CI 14·3-not estimable). We performed separate univariate analyses to evaluate any associations between the IPSS-M and OS/PFS. The median OS in patients with higher-risk MDS by IPSS-M (MH, H, VH) was 15·0 months vs 29·4 months in the lower-risk disease by IPSS-M (VL, L, ML) group (p=0·12). Interestingly, statistically significant findings were observed with 1-year PFS when stratifying patients into higher vs lower risk MDS by IPSS-M (64·3% vs 100·0%, respectively; p=0·022, Fig. 2).

Conclusion In this cohort of MDS patients who had experienced multiple lines of prior therapy and exhibited high-molecular-complexity, canakinumab showed limited efficacy (HI 17.3%). Nevertheless, canakinumab showed a good safety profile and yielded sustained long-term responses in patients with single somatic driver mutation in TET2 or DNMT3A. This suggests that clonal complexity, and therefore disease burden, may be a determining factor in response to canakinumab. Therefore, we have amended the protocol of a phase 1/2 clinical trial evaluating the safety and activity of canakinumab in clonal cytopenia of unknown significance (CCUS) and low-molecular complexity MDS patients. Our results will clarify the role of IL-1β signaling in MDS initiation and progression.