Session: 732. Allogeneic Transplantation: Disease Response and Comparative Treatment Studies: Poster II
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Acute Myeloid Malignancies, AML, Biological therapies, Diseases, Therapies, Myeloid Malignancies, Transplantation
ELN risk stratification of AML with t(8;16) was based on studies that included relatively low numbers of patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). In the largest report by Kayser et al. (Br J Haematol 2021) 21 patients (15 transplanted in first complete remission [CR1], median follow-up 5.5 years) were analyzed. A 5-year overall survival (OS) of 38% was achieved after alloSCT compared to 11% in patients who received chemotherapy only.
The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with AML harboring t(8;16) after alloSCT in a larger cohort from the EBMT registry. All types of donor, conditioning regimen and graft were included. Sixty patients were identified, of whom 44 had been transplanted in CR1. Median follow-up from alloSCT was 72.3 months, median age was 46.3 years, and 73.3% were female. Karnofsky performance status was >80% in 59 patients, one had missing data.
At 2 years after alloSCT, OS and leukemia free survival (LFS) of the entire cohort were 42.7% and 42.2%, respectively, (28.6% and 14.3% in patients transplanted in advanced disease). Cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at two years was 36.9% and 15.3%, respectively, in patients transplanted in CR1, and 78.6% and 7.1%, respectively, in patients transplanted in advanced disease.
The 44 patients transplanted in CR1 were analyzed in detail. Basic characteristics were comparable to the entire cohort as described above. Twenty-two of the patients had de novo, 22 had sAML. According to the ELN 2017 classification (not yet including t(8;16) as a factor for poor prognosis), 54.5% had an intermediate and 45.5% an adverse cytogenetic risk. Furthermore, 38.8% had a complex karyotype. Donors were matched related in 34%, matched unrelated in 54%, haploidentical in 5% and cord blood in 7%. Conditioning was myeloablative in 52.3%, whereas 47.7% had received reduced intensity conditioning.
Among patients transplanted in CR1, 2- and 5-year OS from alloSCT was 48% and 39.9%, the respective LFS was 46.8% and 35.5%. On multivariate analysis (MVA), harboring t(8;16) within a complex karyotype was the major risk factor for outcome, being associated with higher RI (hazard ratio [HR] 3.38, p=0.01), lower LFS (HR 4.17, p=0.016), and lower OS (HR 3.08, p=0.017). In contrast, patients with t(8;16) outside of a complex karyotype achieved excellent results (Figure 1). Besides a complex karyotype, MVA revealed sAML as an additional, independent risk factor with a higher RI (HR 3.73, p=0.026). Age was the major factor for NRM, reaching 5% vs. 26.5% in patients below or above the median (p=0.02).
In conclusion, according to the largest series analyzed in this setting so far, overall results after alloSCT in AML with t(8;16) transplanted in CR1 were favorable, especially in patients without multiple additional cytogenetic abnormalities, achieving a low risk of relapse and a 5-year OS >60%. Hence, alloSCT in CR1 appears to abrogate the unfavorable prognostic value of this translocation. Whether or not t(8;16) does have any additional influence on the outcome of patients with a complex karyotype remains to be evaluated.
Figure Legend
Figure 1: Outcome of AML with t(8;16) with and without complex karyotype
Disclosures: Versluis: AbbVie: Honoraria; ExCellThera: Consultancy. Chevallier: Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Immedica Pharma: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria. Forcade: Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; MSD: Other: Travel support. Baron: ExCellThera Inc: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria; Incyte Biosciences: Consultancy. Bug: Gilead: Honoraria, Other: travel grant; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Other: travel grant; Neovii: Other: trvel grant; Pfizer: Honoraria. Esteve: Abbvie: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kronos Bio: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding. Ciceri: ExCellThera: Other: Scientific Advisory Board . Mohty: JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria, Research Funding.