Type: Oral
Session: 617. Acute Myeloid Leukemias: Biomarkers, Molecular Markers and Minimal Residual Disease in Diagnosis and Prognosis: Deciphering Risk by Genetic and Epigenetic Features
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Acute Myeloid Malignancies, AML, Translational Research, genomics, pediatric, Diseases, Myeloid Malignancies, Biological Processes, molecular biology, Study Population, Human
Methods: NPM1 mutations were sequenced in a group of 345 pediatric patients with de novo AML. 166 patients were enrolled in recent AIEOP, BFM, ELAM02, NOPHO, DCOG trials, and 179 in the CCG/COG AML trials (CCG-2961, AAML03P1, AAML0531 and AAML1031). A cohort of 75 patients of SWOG young adult (age 18-60) AML trial (S0106) were also included as validation cohort. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probabilities of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS).
Results: In this cohort of 345 pediatric patients sequencing of exon 12 demonstrated multiple 4 bp insertion subtypes, with type A variant detected in 188 patients (55%), type B in 64 cases (19%) and type D mutation in 26 patients (7.5%). Other variants with the loss of the 2 Trp residues (namely A-like) were found in 42 patients (12%), whereas in 25 patients (7.5%) we identified mutations with the loss of 1 Trp residue (namely non-A-like). Comparison of disease characteristics demonstrated that NPM1 variants were prevalent in older patients (median age=13.3 years). WBC count was not significantly different among subgroups (Type A=30.3; Alike=25.2; B=16.8; D=41; non-A-like= 14.8x103/ul, p=0.14). FLT3-ITD prevalence was higher in Type A, B and D compared to the other Type A-like variants (42%, 44%, 46% vs. 26%); interestingly, FLT3-ITD was absent in non-A-like variants. Evaluation of clinical outcome based on NPM1 genotypes showed that although patients with type A, A-Like, non-A-like and type B had favorable outcomes, those with Type D had a significantly worse outcome with OS of 63% versus 86% for other genotypes (p=0.0053). Type D variant adverse outcome was confirmed in most of the trials and will be further examined considering different treatments. Each NPM1 variant mediated a different EFS, with most of early events occurring within the D group (EFS 51.4%), and type A (EFS 68.8%) compared to the non-A-like NPM1, A like and B mutations (79.8%, 73%, and 75.5%, respectively) (p=ns). Validation data from adult SWOG trial (SWOG0106) demonstrated similar adverse outcome with EFS of 40% for type D vs. 61.4% for other NPM1 variants, indicating D as a peculiar NPM1 genotype /Figure A). Evaluation of overlapping mutations demonstrated that except for lack of FLT3-ITD in non-A-like genotype, there was similar distribution of high-risk mutations (FLT3-ITD, WT1, etc.) in those with different genotypes, thus not explaining the underlying biology responsible for the Type D adverse outcome. Even if the aminoacidic sequence of D and A variants is the same, the different prognosis suggests a further layer of regulation. We inquired whether Type D genotype might have a different NPM1 localization pattern compared to that in Type A variant. Immunofluorescence staining of primary AML cells from patients with Type D vs. Type A variant demonstrated that, in contrast to the canonical Type A variant with aberrant cytoplasmic localization, Type D variant maintains nuclear localization (Figure B). Further studies will provide the underlying biology of Type D being a silent mutation mediating a clinical outcome like NPM1 wild type AML.
Conclusion: This Eu/COG/SWOG collaborative study of over 400 pediatric and adult patients suggest a different functional biology behind NPM1 genotype where those with Type D variants have a significantly inferior outcome resembling feature of non-NPM1 mutated AML. Our data suggest that the specific genotype of NPM1 mutations can contribute to a more accurate risk-stratification, with D cases eventually shifting from standard to higher risk groups.
Disclosures: Reinhardt: Medac: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Eusa: Speakers Bureau; BluebirdBio: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Speakers Bureau; Immedica: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; JAZZ Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Cerus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Locatelli: Miltenyi, Jazz Pharm, Medac, Sobi, Gilead, BluebirdBio: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi, Vertex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bellicum, Amgen, Neovii, Novartis. Sanofi, SOBI, Vertex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts