Martina Ferrante1*, Daniela Drandi1*, Silvia Zibellini2*, Luigi Marcheselli3*, Chiara Varraso2*, Veronica Peri, MD4,5*, Irene Dogliotti, MD5*, Davide Musto4*, Emilia Cappello6*, Federica Cavallo4,7*, Angela Ferrari8*, Michele Merli9*, Giulia Zamprogna10*, Luca Laurenti, MD11*, Simona Tomasetti12*, Emanuele Cencini, MD13*, Giacomo Loseto, MD14*, Silvia Finotto, MD15*, Monia Marchetti, MD16*, Francesca Re, MD17*, Antonello Sica, MD18*, Jacopo Olivieri19*, Giulia Vittoria Facchetti6*, Cristina Jiménez20*, Noemi Puig, MD, PhD20, Giulia Turra6*, Benedetto Bruno, MD, PhD5,21, Ramon Garcia-Sanz, MD, PhD20*, Marzia Varettoni2* and Simone Ferrero, MD4,5
1Division of Hematology ,Department of Molecular Biotechologies and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
2Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
3Fondazione Italiana Linfomi, Clinical Trial Office, Modena, Italy
4Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnologies and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
5Division of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Unit, University Hospital AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
6Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
7Division of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
8IRCCS - Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Hematology, ITA, Reggio Emilia, Italy
9Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
10Department of Hematology, Niguarda Cancer Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
11S. Ematologia, Dipartimento Scienze Radiologiche Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
12Ematologia, Ospedale degli Infermi di Rimini, Rimini, Italy
13Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese & University of Siena, Siena, Italy
14IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Hematology Unit, Bari, Italy
15Oncologia1, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
16Ematologia, Ospedale Civile SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
17UO Ematologia e CTMO, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
18Oncologia Medica ed Ematologia, AOU Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
19Clinica Ematologica, Centro Trapianti e Terapie Cellulari "Carlo Melzi", Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
20Hospital Universitario de Salamanca (HUSAL), IBSAL, IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain
21Division of Hematology ,Department of Molecular Biotechologies and Health Sciences, University of Torino,Division of Hematology and Stem cell transplant unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
Introduction. MYD88L265P is the hallmark mutation in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) and is becoming increasingly important in the management of IgM-gammopathies, due to its role as prognostic and predictive biomarker. Recently,
MYD88L265P detection by allele-specific quantitative PCR was proposed as reliable minimal residual disease (MRD) marker in bone marrow (BM) samples (Varettoni, Hematol Oncol 2022). Novel, more sensitive, techniques as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) might extend the feasibility of MRD detection in WM also in non-invasive tissues, as peripheral blood (PB) or plasmatic cell-free (cf) DNA. This was a secondary endpoint of the multicenter, observational “BIOWM” (NCT03521596) trial, sponsored by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) and the International WM Foundation/Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. From 2018 to 2020 this trial enrolled 300 consecutive patients with primary diagnosis of WM or IgM-MGUS and a systematic biobanking was performed. Here are presented the first results of the MRD study on the patient subset who received frontline treatment, with the aim of driving correlations with clinical response, type of therapy received and outcome prediction.
Methods. Paired BM, PB and plasma samples were collected for each patient at baseline (T0) and follow-up and
MYD88L265P detection was performed by ddPCR in all specimens (Drandi, Haematologica 2018). As of today, 59/300 patients (58 WM and 1 IgM-MGUS) received frontline treatment and MRD levels after therapy (T2) were detected by ddPCR: actually, T0-T2 paired samples were available in 49 (BM), 56 (PB) and 48 (cfDNA) cases, respectively. Moreover, MRD was evaluated also by 8-color multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) in 23 BM and 24 PB samples with a minimum of 10 million cells acquired.
Results. Median age of the 59 treated patients was 68 years (24-85), 32% were female, median IgM value was 2420 mg/dL (101-8840), median Hb 10.5 g/dL (8 -17) and IPSS-WM was high in 35% and intermediate in 46%.
MYD88L265P mutation rate was 94% (46/49) in BM, 80% (45/56) in PB and 90% (43/48) in cfDNA samples, respectively. Treatment was started because of anemia in 32% cases, lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly in 34%, hyperviscosity in 20%, other reasons in 13%, and the only MGUS patient required treatment for anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein polyneuropathy. Thirty-one out of 59 patients received bendamustine-rituximab (BR), 23/59 dexamethasone, rituximab and cyclophosphamide (DRC) or DRC-like regimen and 5/59 a single agent therapy (namely, 3 rituximab, 1 cyclophosphamide, 1 ibrutinib). Overall response rate was 90% (87% for BR and 96% for DRC), with 19% CR, 29% VGPR and 35% PR in BR and 4% CR, 0% VGPR and 91% PR in DRC, respectively. Overall, MRD negativity after treatment was 30% (14/46) in BM, 89% (40/45) in PB and 54% (23/43) in cfDNA, respectively. Moreover, among patients still MRD positive after treatment, median
MYD88L265P tumor burden shrinkage was about 2 Logs in BM (5.5E-03 vs 2.1E-01) and around 1 Log in cfDNA (5.9E-03 vs 3.7E-02) and in PB samples (3.6E-03 vs 2.5E-02), respectively (Figure 1). Interestingly, the MRD shrinkage in BM was deeper among patients receiving BR (48% MRD negative with a median
MYD88L265P decrease of more than 2 Logs among patients still MRD positive) vs patients receiving DRC (10% MRD negative with a median decrease of 1 Log), Figure 2. Similar trends in favor of BR in inducing MRD negativity were reported in PB (96% vs 88%) and cfDNA (70% vs 35%), respectively. MRD results by MFC were overall in line with ddPCR results: namely 27% of patients reached MRD negativity in BM and 69% in PB. The median follow-up for the whole series was 41 months, resulting in a 3-years PFS of 71% and 3-years OS of 89%, respectively. Interestingly, despite the current limited follow-up for such an indolent disease, MRD positivity by ddPCR in PB predicted a dismal clinical outcome if compared with MRD negative patients (3-years PFS 40% vs 73%, p=0.038).
Conclusions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of prospective MRD evaluation in a WM clinical trial. Our preliminary results suggest that
MYD88L265P monitoring
by ddPCR is a suitable target for MRD analysis, in the contest of common immunochemotherapeutic schedules. Moreover, different levels of disease persistence were described across BM, PB and cfDNA, with MRD monitoring in non-invasive tissues showing promising predictive value for outcome discrimination.
Disclosures: Cavallo: Beigene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Laurenti: AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Puig: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; The Binding Site: Consultancy, Honoraria. Garcia-Sanz: Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Eusa Pharma: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lilly: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics America: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Consultancy; Ideogen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; invivo scribe (IVS): Patents & Royalties. Varettoni: ASTRAZENECA: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BEIGENE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JANSSEN: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ABBVIE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ferrero: Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Beigene: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Clinigen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gentili: Speakers Bureau; Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.