Type: Oral
Session: 636. Myelodysplastic Syndromes – Basic and Translational: Molecular Drivers and Therapeutic Implications
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Translational Research, Clinical Research, Diseases, Myeloid Malignancies
In this study, we explored the applicability of current schemes used for MDS outcome prediction leveraging an international collaboration across 6 academic centers. We accrued a total of 238 MDS cases from a cohort of 409 MN patients with DDX41 mutations with clinical-molecular annotations and relevant follow up data. For relevant comparisons, a cohort of 1212 DDX41 wild-type (WT) MDS cases with matching annotations and follow up was used.
Overall, the median age at MDS diagnosis was 69 years (IQR 61-76) with a strong male predominance (4.4 M:F ratio). According to IPSS-R, patients clustered in very low (10%), low (17%), intermediate (34%), high (20%) and very high (18%) risk groups, whereas by IPSS-M the redistribution of risk categories was as follows: very low (7%), low (27%), moderate low (18%), moderate high (16%), high (15%), and very high (17%). After merging the moderate low/high IPSS-M categories for comparison purposes, the overall shift was 51%, with 38% up- and 62% down-staged. Notably, pairwise Log-Rank tests across IPSS-R/M risk categories resulted in non-significant survival differences in majority of subgroups, pinpointing how these commonly used schemes fail in separating DDX41-mutant MDS into groups of diverse prognoses. Conversely, the same analysis in the WT cohort led to a significant separation and identification of distinct prognostic categories. (Fig1A)
Next, we examined the reasons why DDX41-mutant MDS cases defy accuracy of current prognostic schemes. When looking at DDX41 specific genomic configuration, cases with germline plus p.R525H somatic mutations showed higher bone marrow blast percentages (median 11%) vs those acquiring other secondary somatic hits (4%, p<.001) or harboring only 1 germline alteration (7%, p=.002). By dividing patients according to IPSS-R scores (lower <3.5, higher-risk >3.5), we noticed a twice higher frequency of adverse risk MDS among patients with germline plus p.R525H mutations (p=.009). Thus, we explored whether DDX41 specific mutational configuration may have a role in driving MDS outcomes. While no survival difference was found between cases with germline alone vs germline plus somatic configuration, the dissection of the genomic architecture of double mutants showed worse survival outcomes and faster leukemia evolution in cases carrying truncating and/or p.R525H mutations (Fig1B). These features still held significance in a DDX41-specific multivariable model for leukemia progression considering age and gender, with the best goodness of fit (Akaike Information Criterion-AIC: 131; c-index: 0.81) as compared to IPSS-R (AIC: 150, c-index: 0.71) and IPSS-M (AIC: 144, c-index: 0.73), whereas the acquisition of p.R525H mutation was the only independent predictor of survival (HR=3.9, 95% CI 1.5-9.9, p=.005).
We show that IPSS-R/M are not able to adequately assess leukemic evolution and survival outcomes in DDX41-mutant MDS. Indeed, germline truncating and somatic p.R525H mutations are better predictors of faster leukemic evolution and survival. Additional risk factors inherent to this MDS subentity hold a prognostic significance beyond the consideration of traditional disease-specific variables, substantiating the need for a dedicated risk scoring system. This refined prognostication approach is also a consideration for other known germline mutations with predisposition to MN.
Disclosures: Mendes Sapinho: Abbvie: Honoraria. Voso: Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; Syros: Other: Advisory Board; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau. DeZern: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Caribou: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Consultancy; Appellis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garcia-Manero: Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: Medical writing support, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Kulasekararaj: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Akari Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioCryst: Consultancy; Samsung: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Achillion: Consultancy. Maciejewski: Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Omeros: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy, Honoraria.