denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.
denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.
denotes that this is a ticketed session.Session: 508. Bone Marrow Failure: Poster III
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Adult, Diseases, Non-Biological, Bone Marrow Failure, Therapies, platelets, Adverse Events, white blood cells, Cell Lineage, Study Population, Clinically relevant, pharmacology
Methods: Patients diagnosed with non-severe aplastic anemia (NSAA) between January 2018 to January 2019 in Peking Union Medical Colleague Hospital who were refractory to immunosuppressive therapy were treated with ELT and followed up for at least 6 months. Plasma concentrations of ELT were detected by the high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry after at least two months of ELT treatment and staying for that dosage for at least two weeks. Dose-concentration, concentration-response and concentration- ADR relation were evaluated.
Results: Among the 72 patients treated with ELT during that period, 44 patients with complete data were enrolled. 6 (13.6%) were males and 38 were females (86.4%) with a median age of 54 years (IQR: 38.5-63). By the time of plasma concentration detected, the median dosage of ELT was 75(IQR 50-100) mg/d and median time for total ELT exposure was 3 (IQR 2.0-6.0) months, and 37 (70.5%) patients responded to ELT. The median concentration of ELT was 10.4μg/ml (IQR 3.7-24.4μg/ml). The concentration of ELT was positively correlated with the daily dose of ELT (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of inefficacy of ELT with a concentration between 11.2-15.2 μg/ml was 0.028-fold (95% CI: 0.001-0.864; P=0.041) to those with a concentration between 3.2-7.2μg/ml. The cutoff value of concentration for ELT efficacy was 12.50μg/ml by receiver operation characteristic curve. A higher risk of ADR was related to a longer total exposure to ELT (P=0.012). Although not significant, odd ratio (OR) increased with ELT concentration, suggesting a possible elevated risk of ADR correlated with blood concentration.
Conclusions: ELT is effective for the treatment of NSAA with accepTable side effects. Plasma concentration of ELT correlated with the dose and the effects of ELT.
Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
OffLabel Disclosure: Eltrombopag (ELT) has been proven to induce trilinear hematopoietic responses in relapse/refractory AA patients and has been approval as a monotherapy in relapsed/refractory SAA in the USA and Europe. However, the use of ELT is only approved for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in China by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), for AA it is still "off-label".