-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1790 Clinical and Cytogenetic Characterization of Light Chain Amyloidosis Patients with a Low Amyloidogenic Free Light Chain Count at First Diagnosis

Myeloma: Biology and Pathophysiology, excluding Therapy
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 651. Myeloma: Biology and Pathophysiology, excluding Therapy: Poster I
Saturday, December 5, 2015, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Tobias Dittrich, MD1*, Ute Hegenbart, MD1*, Tilmann Bochtler, MD1*, Christoph Kimmich, MD1*, Anna Jauch, Prof.2*, Arnt Kristen, MD3*, Hartmut Goldschmidt, MD4, Anthony D. Ho, MD5 and Stefan Schönland, MD6*

1Amyloidosis Center, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
2Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
3Medical Dept. / Cardiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
4Internal Medicine V, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
5Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
6Amyloidosis Center, Department of Internal Medicine V, Division of Hematology/Oncology/Rheumatology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Background: Systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL) is a rare and life-threatening protein-deposition disorder. The diagnosis and especially quantification of the underlying, usually small clonal B cell disorder in patients with very low levels of free kappa or lambda light chains in serum (FLC) can be challenging. DFLC (difference of involved minus uninvolved FLC) response to therapy is hardly assessable for initial values below 50 mg/l. Consequently, these patients are frequently excluded from prospective and retrospective studies.

Objective: Characterization of AL amyloidosis patients with dFLC<50.

Methods: We have retrospectively analysed the clinical features and long-term outcome of 611 newly diagnosed AL patients with available dFLC and cytogenetic evaluation by iFISH at their first visit to our center between 2003-2014.

Results: Clinical characteristics and detailed results are depicted in table 1. Patients with dFLC<50 significantly showed lower bone marrow plasma cell counts (6% vs. 10%, p<0.001), M-spike (7 g/l vs. 9 g/l, p<0.001) and concentrations of the monoclonal heavy chain (7 g/l vs. 10 g/l, p=0.003), while the mere presence of a monoclonal heavy chain in immunofixation (IF) was more frequent in these patients (55% vs. 38%, p=0.003). All analysed chromosomal aberrations were not associated with dFLC<50 (all p-values >0.05). Patients with cardiac (40% vs. 82%, p<0.001) and soft tissue (26% vs. 42%, p=0.005) involvement, higher Mayo Score and lower Karnofsky Index (KI) were much less frequently found in the group with initial dFLC<50, while kidney involvement was more common (85% vs. 58%, p<0.001). This, however, was not associated with a significantly worse renal function at diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly better in patients with dFLC<50 regardless of treatment type (Figure 1): Bortezomib (77 vs. 16 months, p=0.006), Melphalan-Dexamethason (Mdex, 96 vs. 19 months, p=0.001) and high-dose Melphalan (HDM, not reached vs. 99 months, p=0.005).

Conclusion: AL patients with an initial dFLC<50 mg/l represent a distinct clinical entity characterized by infiltration of the marrow with a small plasma cell clone and frequent presence of a monoclonal intact heavy chain, but with a low clonal heavy chain load. Importantly, this group of patients is not associated with any particular chromosomal aberrations as revealed by iFISH. This entity is further associated with a distinct pattern of organ involvement, i.e. a low Mayo Score, more than 80% of patients with renal amyloidosis, and very favourable OS irrespective of primary treatment regimens. Results of prospective clinical trials might be adversely influenced by the exclusion of these patients.

 

Table 1

Parameter

All patients

n=611

dFLC < 50 mg/l

n=85

dFLC ≥ 50 mg/l

n=526

p values

Age in years, median [range]

66 [38-90]

65 [47-90]

66 [38-90]

n.s.

Sex female, no. of pts (%)

235 (39)

39 (46)

196 (37)

n.s.

Plasma cell related factors

dFLC in mg/l,

median [range]

228

[1-12.078]

29 [1-49]

279 [50-12.078]

-

Monoclonal heavy chain in IF, no. of pts (%)

248 (41)

47 (55)

201 (38)

0.003

M-spike in g/l, median [range]

Evaluable pts (%)

9 [1-41]

159 (26)

7 [1-22]

31 (36)

9 [1-41]

128 (24)

<0.001

Involved heavy chain in g/l,

median [range]

Evaluable pts (%)

9.6

[0.5-197]

243 (40)

6.8

[1.2-26]

45 (53)

10.2

[0.5-197]

198 (38)

0.003

Involved light chain λ, no. of pts (%)

490 (80)

73 (86)

417 (79)

n.s.

BM plasma cell count in %,

median [range]

10 [1-90]

6 [1-40]

10 [1-90]

<0.001

iFISH results, no. of pts (%)

  t(11;14)

350 (58)

42 (51)

308 (59)

n.s.

  del 13q14

201 (33)

27 (33)

174 (33)

n.s.

  gain 1q21

166 (27)

22 (26)

144 (27)

n.s.

  Hyperdiploidy

   (Wuilleme Score)

98 (16)

12 (14)

86 (16)

n.s.

  High-risk

   (del 17p13, t(4;14), t(14;16))

47 (8)

7 (8)

40 (8)

n.s.

Organ involvement

Number of Organs,

median [range]

2 [1-6]

2 [1-6]

3 [1-6]

0.001

Heart, no. of pts (%)

463 (76)

34 (40)

429 (82)

<0.001

Cardiac Mayo Score 2004:

I, no. of pts (%)

II, no. of pts (%)

III, no. of pts (%)

 

101 (18)

214 (38)

255 (45)

 

35 (46)

30 (40)

11 (15)

 

66 (13)

184 (37)

244 (49)

<0.001

Kidney, no. of pts (%)

376 (62)

72 (85)

304 (58)

<0.001

MDRD, median [range]

64 [2-264]

68 [8-149]

63 [2-264]

n.s.

Soft Tissue, no. of pts (%)

243 (40)

22 (26)

221 (42)

0.005

KI %, median [range]

80 [40-100]

90 [50-100]

80 [40-100]

0.001

Treatment groups, no. of pts / median follow-up in months, median OS

  Bortezomib

214 / 27

24

23 / 19

77

191 / 28

16

 

0.006

  Mdex

156 / 74

27

21 / 75

96

135 / 70

19

 

0.001

  HDM

115 / 75

129

24 / 75

not reached

91 / 69

99

 

0.005

Figure 1

Disclosures: Hegenbart: Janssen: Honoraria . Bochtler: TEVA: Other: travel support . Goldschmidt: Onyx: Consultancy , Honoraria , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Speakers Bureau ; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy , Honoraria , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding , Speakers Bureau ; Chugai: Honoraria , Research Funding , Speakers Bureau ; Millenium: Honoraria , Research Funding , Speakers Bureau ; Takeda: Consultancy , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees ; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding ; Amgen: Consultancy , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees ; Novartis: Consultancy , Honoraria , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding , Speakers Bureau ; Celgene: Consultancy , Honoraria , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding , Speakers Bureau . Schönland: Janssen, Prothena: Honoraria , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding .

*signifies non-member of ASH