-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1617 Clinical Significance of CSF3R, SRSF2 and SETBP1mutation in Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Myeloproliferative Syndromes: Clinical
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 634. Myeloproliferative Syndromes: Clinical: Poster I
Saturday, December 5, 2015, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Chun Qiao1*, Yuan Ouyang2* and Sujiang Zhang2,3*

1Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China
2Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
3Department of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital North Affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, shanghai, China

ObjectiveTo investigate the gene mutation and the clinical features of CSF3R, SETBP1 and SRSF2in chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) patients.

MethodSequence analysis of CSF3R, SETBP1 and SRSF2were performed in 10  CNL and 56 CMML patients whose clinical features were also studied.

ResultAmong 10 CNL patients, 8(8/10, 80%) patients had CSF3R mutations and 7(7/8, 87.5%) of them were with CSF3R T618I. In 56 cases of patients with CMML, SRSF2 mutations were found in 14(14/56,25%), CSF3R in 4(4/56,7.1%) and SETBP1 in 3(3/56, 5.3%) patients. In CMML, compared to wild-type(wt) SRSF2 patients, SRSF2 mutated patients appeared to be more possible with SETBP1 mutations [1/14(7.1%) vs. 2/42(4.8%), P>0.05], less possible with CSF3R mutation [0/14(0%) vs. 4/42(9.5%), P<0.001]. The clinical characteristics such as age, gender, WHO category, FAB category, karyotype and blood cell counts did not reveal any difference between SRSF2 mutated and wtSRSF2 patients. Either SRSF2 mutated patients or SETBP1 mutated patients both had shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival(PFS) when compared with those with wtSRSF2 (P<0.001 both) and wtSETBP1 (P<0.001 and P=0.02, respectively). No significant difference of OS and PFS between CSF3R mutated and wtCSF3R patients were observed. In multivariate analysis, SRSF2 mutation was an independent negative predictor for OS (HR, 3.307; 95% CI, 1.137 to 9.614; P=0.028) and PFS(HR, 15.431; 95% CI, 3.041 to 78.312; P = 0.001). What’s more, SETBP1 mutation was also an independent negative predictor for OS(HR, 9.492; 95% CI, 1.183 to 76.128; P= 0.034).

ConclusionThe majority of patients with WHO-defined CNL have oncogenic mutations in CSF3R and the T618I mutation type is a highly sensitive and specific molecular marker of the disease. While mutations of SRSF2 are common in CMML and may be of prognostic significance. As a non-specific molecular marker, SETBP1was found in CNL, CMML and other blood cancers, which have poor prognosis.

Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

*signifies non-member of ASH