-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1419 High Prevalence of Relapse in Australian Children with Ph-like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Despite Risk Adapted Treatment

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Biology, Cytogenetics and Molecular Markers in Diagnosis and Prognosis
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 618. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Biology, Cytogenetics and Molecular Markers in Diagnosis and Prognosis: Poster I
Saturday, December 5, 2015, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Susan L Heatley, PhD, MEd1,2*, Teresa Sadras, PhD1,2*, Eva Nievergall, PhD1,2*, Chung Hoow Kok, PhD1,2*, Phuong Dang, BSci (Hon)1*, Kelly Quek, PhD1*, Nicola C Venn3*, Sarah Moore, BSc (Hon), FFSc (RCPA)4*, Tamara Law, BSc (Hons)3*, Anthea Ng, BAppSc, MSc5,6*, Murray D Norris, PhD7,8*, Tamas Revesz, MD, PhD6,9*, Michael P Osborn, MBBS6,9*, Chris Fraser, FRACP, MBBS, MPH6,10*, Frank Alvaro, MBBS, FRACP6,11*, Glenn M Marshall, MBBS, MD, FRACP6,12,13, Luciano Dalla Pozza, MBBS, FRACP5,6*, Timothy P. Hughes, MD, MBBS, FRACP, FRCPA1,2,14, Charles G. Mullighan, MBBS, MSc, MD15, Rosemary Sutton, PhD6,16* and Deborah L White, PhD, FFSc (RCPA)1,2,6

1Cancer Theme, South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
2School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
3Molecular Diagnostics, Children's Cancer Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia
4Department of Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
5Department of Oncology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
6Australian and New Zealand Children's Haematology/Oncology Group, Melbourne, Australia
7Molecular Diagnostics, Children's Cancer Institute, Sydney, Australia
8Centre for Childhood Cancer Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
9Department of Haematology & Oncology, Women's & Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
10Children's Health Queensland, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
11John Hunter Children's Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
12School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
13Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
14Department of Haematology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
15Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
16Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Introduction:

While remission rates for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) now exceed 80%, relapsed ALL remains the leading cause of non-traumatic death in children. Recently, a high-risk group of B-progenitor ALL patients has been identified. Such cases exhibit a gene expression profile similar to that of BCR-ABL1 positive (Ph+) ALL but are BCR-ABL1 negative, and also experience poor treatment outcomes. This subset, termed Ph-like ALL, is characterised by a range of genetic alterations that activate cytokine receptor and kinase signalling, allowing potential targeting by available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). The frequency of Ph-like ALL in the Australian community and the prognosis in the setting of the first MRD (minimal residual disease) intervention trial by the Australian and New Zealand Children's Haematology/Oncology Group (ANZCHOG ALL8) is unknown.

Method:

We retrospectively screened 250 unselected samples that were available from children diagnosed with B-ALL, for Ph-like ALL. The children, aged between 1 and 18 years, were enrolled on the ANZCHOG ALL8 trial and recruited from 2002-2011. The criteria for stratification to the high-risk group, based upon Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster (BFM) protocols, were BCR-ABL1 or MLL t(4;11) translocation; poor prednisolone response at day 8; failure to achieve remission by day 33 or high MRD (>5 x10-4) at day 79. MRD was measured by RQ-PCR for patient-specific immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor rearrangements. All patients received a standard BFM four drug induction chemotherapy regimen including a prednisolone pre-phase and intrathecal methotrexate. High-risk patients received a further three novel intensive blocks of chemotherapy followed by transplant in most cases. Patients were screened for Ph-like ALL using a custom Taqman Low Density Array (TLDA) based upon previous reports. Fusions were then confirmed by RT-PCR for 30 known fusions, Sanger sequencing, mRNA sequencing and/or FISH.

Results:

Ten percent (25/250) of children in this cohort were identified as having Ph-like ALL, with most fusions converging on kinase activating pathways (Table 1). Three Ph-like ALL patients were considered high-risk, the remaining 22 (88%) were medium risk. Five children with Ph-like ALL, that did not have a fusion identified by RT-PCR, are currently under further investigation. Furthermore, 15 of the 20 (75%) of rearrangements involved CRLF2 with 10 (66%) of these children relapsing. Strikingly, 56% (14/25) of children in the ALL8 cohort who were identified as Ph-like subsequently relapsed compared to 16% (36/225) who were not, with significantly worse event free survival (p<0.0001) (Figure 1).

Conclusion:

Here we demonstrate a significantly higher frequency of relapse amongst Australian children with Ph-like ALL compared to non Ph-like disease despite a MRD-adjusted intensification regimen. In this cohort, these children should be classified as high-risk due to high treatment failure rates with standard/medium risk regimens. Importantly, rapid identification of these patients may guide future intervention with targeted therapies, such as TKI, matched to the causative genetic lesion in this high-risk group.

Table 1: Fusions identified in Ph-like ALL from ANZCHOG ALL8 cohort.

Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier estimates of event free survival for patients with Ph-like ALL and non Ph-like ALL (all risk groups).

Disclosures: Hughes: ARIAD: Honoraria , Research Funding ; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria , Research Funding ; Novartis: Honoraria , Research Funding . Mullighan: Incyte: Consultancy , Honoraria ; Cancer Science Institute: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees ; Amgen: Honoraria , Speakers Bureau ; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding . White: Novartis: Honoraria , Research Funding ; BMS: Honoraria , Research Funding .

*signifies non-member of ASH