-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

4182 The Epigenetic Repression of Mir-375 Is the Dominant Mechanism for the Constitutive Activation of PDPK1/RSK2 Signaling Axis in Multiple Myeloma

Myeloma: Biology and Pathophysiology, excluding Therapy
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 651. Myeloma: Biology and Pathophysiology, excluding Therapy: Poster III
Monday, December 7, 2015, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Shotaro Tatekawa, MD1*, Junya Kuroda, MD, PhD2*, Yoshiaki Chinen, MD1*, Yuji Shimura, MD1*, Hisao Nagoshi, MD1*, Tsutomu Kobayashi, MD, PhD2*, Eri Kawata, MD, PhD3*, Nobuhiko Uoshima, MD, PhD3*, Hiroshi Handa, MD, PhD4 and Masafumi Taniwaki2*

1Division of Hematology and Oncology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
2Division of Hematology and Oncology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
3Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
4Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan

[Introduction] Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cytogenetically/molecularly heterogeneous hematologic malignancy that remains mostly incurable, and the identification of a universal and relevant therapeutic target molecule is essential for the further development of therapeutic strategy. We have recently identified that 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDPK1), a serine threonine kinase, and its major downstream substrate RSK2, a member of the 90 kDa ribosomal S6 kinase family of serine threonine kinases, were universally active in eleven human MM-derived cell lines (HMCLs) examined regardless of the type of cytogenetic abnormality, the mutation state of RAS, RAF and FGFR3 genes and myeloma cells of approximately 90% of symptomatic patients at diagnosis. Our study also disclosed that PDPK1/RSK2 signaling axis played pivotal roles in myeloma pathophysiology by regulating series of downstream molecules, such as c-MYC, IRF4, D-type cyclins, or PLK1, while the inactivation of either PDPK1 or N-terminal domain of RSK2 resulted in the induction of apoptosis in myeloma cells which was accompanied by the activation of BH3-only proteins BIM and BAD (Shimura Y, Mol Caner Ther 2012; Chinen Y, Cancer Res 2014). Here we assessed the underlying mechanism for PDPK1 overexpression in MM.

[Methods] The miR-375 expression level was analyzed by the quantitative RT-PCR in 11 HMCLs and 92 patient-derived myeloma cells isolated by CD138-positive cell sorting (normal plasma cells (N=10), MGUS (N=21), newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) (N=27), relapsed/refractory (RRMM) (N=34). The pre-miR-375 precursor molecule (miR-375 mimics), the siRNA targeted against PDPK1, or a negative control RNA-oligonucleotides was transfected into 8 cell lines by utilizing Hemagglutinating Virus of Japan (HVJ)-envelope vector. The copy number abnormality of PDPK1 gene was assessed by double-color FISH for PDPK1 gene and the centromere of chromosome 16. The methylation status of miR-375 promoter site was analyzed by methylation-specific PCR (MSP). This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and with the approval of the Institutional Review Boards. Patient-derived samples were obtained with informed consent, and normal bone marrow plasma cells were obtained from volunteers who were not affected by hematologic disease.

[Result] The level of miR-375 expression was calculated with 2-ΔCt methods. Human U6 snRNA was examined as the reference. The median log102-ΔCt ± SD of normal plasma cells, MGUS, NDMM, RRMM and HMCLs were -2.46 ± 0.67, -3.64 ± 0.68, -4.23 ± 0.95, -3.92 ± 1.24 and -3.69 ± 0.29 respectively. When compared to normal plasma cells, the miR-375 expression was significantly decreased in NDMM and RRMM (p<0.01, respectively), and tended to be decreased in MGUS (p=0.083) and HMCLs (p=0.097). As the causative of miR-375 repression, our study disclosed that the promoter sites of miR-375 gene were hypermethylated in 8/8 of HMCLs when examined by MSP. The interphase FISH for PDPK1 with centromere chromosome 16 indicated the copy number of PDPK1 gene was increased in 11/11 HMCLss, however, this was never the case with patient-derived myeloma cells (0/7). Importantly, the miR-375 gene transfection resulted in the reduction of PDPK1 expression in 7 of 8 HMCLs, and it simultaneously caused the reduction of the expression levels of IGF1 receptor and JAK2, the known targets of miR-375. Furthermore, when treated with 5-Azacitidine and/or Trichostatin A, miR-375 was markedly upregulated, suggesting that the overlapping epigenetic deregulations, such as DNA hypermethylation or histone deacetylation, are involved in the silencing of miR-375.

[Conclusion and Discussion] PDPK1 is activated by autophosphorylation and, therefore, its expression level is the crucial determinant for its activity, Because our study revealed the miR-375 expression as the major regulator of PDPK1 expression, it is suggested that the abnormally repressed miR-375 is the major causative for the constitutive hyperactivation of the PDPK1/RSK2 signaling axis in MM. Moreover, since the decreased miR-375 expression was observed in plasma cells of MGUS and was more pronounced in MM, miR-375 repression by epigenetic deregulation may be involved in both disease development and progression of MM.

Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

*signifies non-member of ASH