-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

4002 Natural Toll-like Receptor Agonists for in Situ Vaccination Lymphoma Immunotherapy

Lymphoma: Pre-Clinical – Chemotherapy and Biologic Agents
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 625. Lymphoma: Pre-Clinical – Chemotherapy and Biologic Agents: Poster III
Monday, December 7, 2015, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Paul Peng, PhD1, Joshua Brody, MD2 and Linda Hammerich, PhD1*

1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
2Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Introduction: There is an unmet need for novel and effective treatments for lymphoma, the fifth most common malignancy in the US. In situ vaccination—an immunotherapeutic maneuver involving local irradiation, intratumoral (i.t.) injections of Flt3L and Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonist—has been shown in recent clinical trials (NCT00185965, NCT00880581, NCT00226993) to induce partial and complete remissions in patients with low-grade lymphoma. The strength of anti-tumor response correlates with the potency of immunogenic dendritic cells (DCs) to efficiently uptake and present tumor antigens to T cells. While the latest clinical trial NCT01976585 employs Poly-ICLC—a synthetic TLR3 agonist—to activate DCs, we hypothesize that “natural” TLR agonists (nTLRa) contained within prophylactic vaccines (e.g. live/attenuated bacteria or viruses) could simultaneously target multiple TLRs and be repurposed as clinical-grade DC activators for the in situ vaccination maneuver.

Methods: Twenty-four prophylactic vaccines from our hospital’s pharmacy were screened using in vitro assays for TLR ligand activity. DC subsets CD11c+MHC-II+, CD11c+CD11b+, and CD11c+CD103+ were gated for flow-cytometric readouts of: (i.) activation markers (e.g. CD40, CD80, CD86, MHC class I and II), (ii.) ability to co-stimulate T cells in the context of TCR activation, as assessed by T cell activation markers (e.g. CD69, intracellular IFNγ), and (iii.) ability of nTLRa-activated DCs to induce T cell proliferation. TLR knock-out cell lines were used for dissecting the mechanistically-distinct properties of each prophylactic vaccine. Best single and combination nTLRa candidates were evaluated with the in situ vaccination maneuver in an in vivo A20 murine lymphoma model.

Results: We identify a combination of vaccines Typhim, BCG-TICE, and MMR that demonstrates the ability to induce high expression of costimulatory molecules on DCs (Figure A) in vitro, as well as possessing the ability to co-stimulate in vitro T cell activation and proliferation. DC costimulation of T cell activation and proliferation is highly dependent on the “live” status of several vaccines, including BCG, MMR, Zostavax, which suggests the involvement of other pattern-recognition receptors in addition to TLRs. Cohorts of mice implanted with A20 lymphoma tumors that received i.t. injections of Typhim, BCG, MMR demonstrated slower A20 growth status post in situ vaccination maneuver, as compared to the control cohort receiving only Flt3L and irradiation (XRT).

Conclusion: Prophylactic vaccines contain natural ligands to TLRs and are immediately translatable as sources of clinical-grade stimulators of dendritic cells. Combinations of the best nTLRa candidates display synergistic activation of DCs and demonstrate in vivo anti-A20 murine lymphoma immunity.

Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

*signifies non-member of ASH