-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

3064 Central Nervous System Involvement in Aggressive ATLL: Can We Predict the Risk in a Devastating Complication? Epidemiology and Clinical Features from Latin America. a Collaborative Study from Grupo De Estudio Latino-Americano De Linfoproliferativo (GELL) & T-Cell Brazil Project (TCBP)

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 625. T Cell, NK Cell, or NK/T Cell Lymphomas: Clinical and Epidemiological: Poster II
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Adult, Lymphomas, T Cell lymphoma, Diseases, Lymphoid Malignancies, Study Population, Human
Sunday, December 8, 2024, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM

Natalia Pin Chuen Zing, MD1,2*, Thais Fischer, MD3*, Eliana Miranda, PhD, MEd4*, Maria Almeida Dias, MD5*, Yung Gonzaga, MD6*, Renata Lyrio R Baptista, MD7*, Guilherme D Amarante, MD8*, Rony Schaffel, MD, PhD9, Frederico Lisboa Nogueira, MD10, Davimar Bortucchi, MD, PhD11*, Rodrigo Santucci12*, Sergio Brasil, MD13*, Karin Z Cecyn, MD14*, Vera Figueiredo, MD15*, Nelson S Castro, MD16*, Yana S Rabelo, MD17*, Gilnara Fontinele Silva, MD, MSc18*, Abrahão Elias Hallack Neto, MD, PhD19*, Patricia Giacon, MD20*, Milene Matedi, MD21*, Diego Vila Cle22*, Juliana Pereira, MD, PhD23, Fernando Barroso, MD24*, Renata R Souza, MD25*, Henry Quintero, MD26*, Denisse Castro, MD27, Brady E Beltran, MD28*, Daniel J Enriquez, MD29*, Jule F Vasquez, MD30, Claudia Roche, MD31*, Daniel Artiles, MD32*, Fabiola Valvert, MD33*, Luis Mario Villela, MD34*, Ana Carolina Oliver, MD35, Laura Korin, MD36*, Macarena Roa, MD37*, Camila Peña, MD38, Maria Alejandra Torres Viera, MD39*, Seisha Alana von Glasenapp, MEd40, Alfredo Quiroz, MD41*, Cesar Samanez-Figari, MD42*, Rosa Oliday Rios Jimenez43*, Sally Paredes, MD27*, Eduardo Edelman Saul, MD44, Casey Bermack, MD45, Kelly Meza, MD46*, Bryan Valcarcel, MD, MPH47, Carmino De Souza, MD, PhD4*, Luis Malpica, MD48* and Carlos Chiattone, MD, PhD13,49

1Prevent Senior, SAO PAULO, Brazil
2Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa de SP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
3AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, AC, Brazil
4Centro de Hematologia e Hemoterapia (HEMOCENTRO), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
5Federal da Bahia Hospital, Salvador, Brazil
6Cancer National Institute, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
7State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
8Hematology and Hemotherapy Center, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
9HUCFF / UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
10Luxemburgo Hospital, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
11ABC Medical School, Santo Andre, Brazil
12Hemocentro Sao Lucas, Sao Paulo, BRA
13Santa Casa Medical School of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
14Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
15Servidor Publico Estadual de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
16Hospital de Cancer de Barretos, Barretos, São Paulo, BRA
17Goias Federal University, Goias, Brazil
18Aldenora Bello Hospital, Sao Luis, Brazil
19Juiz de Fora Federal University, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
20Santa Marcelina Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil
21Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
22USP Ribeirão, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
23University of São Paulo, Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy & Cell Therapy, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
24TERAPIA CELULAR, HOSPITAL MONTE KLINIKUM, FORTALEZA, Brazil
25Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil
26Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia
27Hospital Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru
28Servicio Oncología Médica, Hospital Edgardo Rebagliati, Lima, Peru
29Instituto Nacional De Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru
30Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, Peru
31Hospital Armando Milan Castro, Vila Clara, Cuba
32Hospital Arnoldo Milan Castro, Vila Clara, Cuba
33INCAN, Mexico, Mexico
34Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
35Hospital Britanico de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
36CABA- Alexander Fleming Institute, Olivos, Argentina
37Santiago Hospital del Salvador, Santiago, Chile
38Hospital Del Salvador, Santiago, Chile
39Clinica Santa Sofia, Caracas, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
40Hospital Central Instituto de Previsión Social, Asuncion, Paraguay
41Departamento de Hematología, Hospital Central Instituto de Previsión Social, Asunción, Paraguay
42Oncosalud, AUNA, Lima, Peru
43Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos Amejeiras, La Habana, Cuba
44Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
45University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
46Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
47George Washington University, Washington, DC
48Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
49Santa Casa de São Paulo. São Paulo – Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil

Introduction

Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) is a mature, peripheral T-cell neoplasm caused by HTLV-1. The cumulative lifetime risk of developing ATLL is estimated as 4-7% among HTLV-1 carriers. Four subtypes have been described using the Shimoyama criteria: acute, lymphomatous, chronic, and smoldering. Acute and lymphoma subtypes are highly aggressive diseases and carry a dismal prognosis, characterized by shorter survival rates and a high risk of central nervous system involvement (iCNS) compared to other peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Currently, the treatment of ATLL remains challenging, lacking a universally accepted standard of care. Our recent study on PTCL epidemiology and outcomes in Latin America (Thais et al 2023 ASH Meeting) highlighted ATLL (18%) as the second most frequent subtype of PTCL, likely influenced by our distinct viral epidemiology.

Objective

The objective of the present study is to assess the prevalence, clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of iCNS in ATLL in Latin America.

Methodology

We compiled data of patients aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed ATLL from the retrospective registry of the GELL (n=208, 2000-2023, retrospective) and TCBP (n=83, 2015-2022, ambispective). Clinical information included coded patient and site identifiers, gender, age, date of diagnosis, sites of disease including extranodal presentation (location and number) and Ann Arbor stage. Initial therapy response; follow-up (remission, progression or relapse); subsequent therapies and outcomes were also recorded. Our primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). REDcap Platform (by Vanderbilt) was used to collect and store data and for descriptive analysis the IBM-SPSS version 24 was applied. Kaplan-Meier method estimated the OS, whereas Log-Rank tests to compare its curves. This trial is registered at Clinical trials (NCT03207789).

Results

We enrolled 291 patients. In this exploratory analysis the prevalence of iCNS in ATLL was 7.9% (23/291), considering only aggressive forms (acute– 40% and 60%–lymphomatous). Patients’ characteristics were similar between those without and with iCNS. There was a high frequency of advanced stage (90% vs 82%); ECOG ≥ 2 (45% vs 43%); B symptoms (74% vs 56%); elevated LDH (84% vs 78%); and IPI ≥3 (82% vs 65%) in the iCNS group. Considering the inclusion of both aggressive subtypes, treatment was heterogeneous including: IFN+AZT (74%) – for acute subtypes, and CHOP (52%), CHOEP (26%) and EPOCH (2%), for lymphoma subtypes. Less than 30% of patients with and without iCNS achieved complete response at end of first treatment. Two clinical features were identified as possibly associated to iCNS: median age at diagnosis (55 [20-95] vs 44 [23-65]; p<0.0001) and extra nodal involvement ≥ 2 (32% vs. 65%, p=0.005).

We reassure the dismal outcomes in the entire cohort of ATLL with 60 months OS and PFS of 16% [95% CI: 12-20%] and 9% [95% CI: 5-13%], respectively; with median time of OS and PFS of 7 months (6-9) and 5 months (4-6), respectively. iCNS did not have an impact on survival outcomes (60 months OS 14% iCNS (n=23) vs 16% no iCNS (n=254), p=0.91; PFS 12% vs 9% no iCNS, p=0.61;) despite being a devastating complication. Outcomes in patients with lymphoma subtypes were slightly better than acute (60 months OS 19% vs 10%, p<0.0001; PFS 12% vs 5%, p<0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion

Unlike other lymphoma subtypes, iCNS in ATLL does not appear to significantly impact outcomes. This paradoxical finding underscores the complexity of ATLL and may reflect the limitations of existing treatment options and the absence of standardized therapeutic protocols for this aggressive malignancy. The lack of significant survival difference, despite the severity of iCNS, points to an urgent need for innovative therapies and more effective treatment strategies. Our analysis identified median age at diagnosis and extranodal involvement as potential risk factors for iCNS, suggesting avenues for future prospective studies to further elucidate their role in disease progression. Given the high prevalence of ATLL in Latin America, there is a unique opportunity to advance our understanding of this disease through region-specific research. Collaborative efforts in this region could pave the way for breakthroughs in the management of ATLL and potentially offer insights applicable on a global scale.

Disclosures: Dias: Astrazeneca: Research Funding. Oliver: Abbvie: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Malpica: Eisai: Research Funding; Dizal: Research Funding.

*signifies non-member of ASH