-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1492 Influence of COVID-19 on Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment Efficacy: Insights from a Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 615. Acute Myeloid Leukemias: Clinical and Epidemiological: Poster I
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Epidemiology, Clinical Research, Adverse Events
Saturday, December 7, 2024, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM

Aditya Sood, MD1*, Anish Sangari, MD2*, Jervon Wright, MD3*, Margaret Locke, MD4*, Joseph Elengickal, MD5*, Lilly Hou, MD6*, Wint Yan Aung, MD7, Adit Singhal, MD8*, Riya George, MD1* and Maria J Nieto, MD, MSc9*

1Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Residency at NS/LIJ, Manhasset, NY
2Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
3Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Residency at NS/LIJ, Coconut Creek, FL
4Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell at NS/LIJ, Floral Park, NY
5Prisma Health University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
6Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, Hempstead, NY
7Zuckerberg Cancer Center, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY
8Zuckerberg Cancer Center, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY
9Northwell Health Center, New Hyde Park, NY

Background:

Severe COVID-19 has long been known to cause long-term immunological changes in a subgroup of infected patients. As such, the COVID-19 pandemic has and will continue to hold the potential to complicate treatment outcomes for patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study assesses whether COVID-19 infection among AML patients influenced mortality rates, renal failure incidence, and adverse reactions to treatment.

Methods:

Utilizing the TriNetX database and the US Collaborative Network with records from 60 healthcare organizations, we conducted a retrospective cohort study including AML cases diagnosed after January 1, 2019. Propensity score matching adjusted for variables such as stage, age, race, gender, and comorbidities created groups of AML patients matched for the above key factors with and without COVID-19. Primary and secondary endpoints included mortality, renal failure, and adverse reactions to treatment.

Results:

Our study matched 3,474 AML patients per group. Surprisingly, AML patients who contracted COVID-19 showed a significantly lower mortality rate of 24.1% compared to their non-COVID counterparts at 40.5% (Risk Difference (RD) -16.4%, 95% CI: -14.2% to -18.6%; p<0.0001). However, the AML + COVID group experienced higher incidences of renal failure (41.7% vs. 32.9%, RD 8.8%, 95% CI: 11.2% to 6.5%; p<0.0001) and adverse reactions to antineoplastics/immunosuppressives (47.1% vs. 31.7%, RD 15.4%, 95% CI: 17.7% to 13.1%; p<0.0001).

Discussion:

This analysis of 6,948 patients indicated that AML patients infected with COVID-19 experienced increased rates of renal failure and adverse reactions to antineoplastic and immunosuppressive treatments, highlighting key intervention areas. The higher renal failure rates may result from the direct nephrotoxic effects of COVID-19 and the renal load from AML chemotherapies like cytarabine and anthracyclines. COVID-related systemic inflammation and potential direct renal infection might lead to acute kidney injury, exacerbating the renal impairment when combined with AML therapy nephrotoxicity.

The observed increase in adverse reactions to antineoplastic and immunosuppressive treatments may stem from altered pharmacokinetics due to systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction in COVID-19, potentially increasing drug toxicity. Additionally, immune dysregulation from COVID-19 could enhance the myelosuppressive effects of chemotherapy, escalating risks of severe neutropenia and related complications.

While there was a lower mortality rate in the AML+COVID-19 group compared to the AML only group, this data needs to be interpreted carefully, as this could be due to data inconsistencies or treatment bias within the database. The study’s retrospective design might have also introduced selection and information biases. Future research should aim to improve data collection uniformity and include detailed information on treatment specifics and COVID-19 severity.

Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

*signifies non-member of ASH