-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

3780 Characterization of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Patients with Early Progression Following Induction with Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (D-RVd)

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 907. Outcomes Research: Plasma Cell Disorders: Poster II
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Adult, Clinical Practice (Health Services and Quality), Plasma Cell Disorders, Diseases, Lymphoid Malignancies, Study Population, Human
Sunday, December 8, 2024, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM

Lilly Gu, MD1*, Nisha S. Joseph, MD2, Vikas A. Gupta, MD, PhD2, Craig C. Hofmeister, MD2, Madhav V. Dhodapkar, MD PhD2, Sagar Lonial, MD3*, Ajay K. Nooka, MD, MPH4 and Jonathan L. Kaufman, MD2

1Emory University, Atlanta
2Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
3Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
4Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta

Introduction: The phase 3 PERSEUS trial has established daratumumab with lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (D-RVd) as standard of care induction therapy in newly diagnosed myeloma (NDMM) showing impressive depth of response and progression free survival (PFS). We have previously published our institutional experience with 326 patients induced with D-RVd followed by stem cell transplant and risk-stratified maintenance therapy showing a post-transplant ORR of 99.3% and 2 year PFS 93% with median follow up of 19.1 months. Despite these impressive results, there is still a subset of patients who experience early relapse. Here, we identify and describe these patients with suboptimal benefit to D-RVd induction.

Methods: We identified 326 NDMM patients treated with D-RVd induction therapy from April 2018 to August 2022. Demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes were obtained from our institutional review board-approved myeloma database. Responses and progression were evaluated per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria. High risk (HR) disease is defined by presence of del(17p), t (4;14) and t(14;16). Data cutoff was June 30, 2024.

Results: The median follow up is 33.2 months. Of the 326 patients, 44 patients had documented disease progression by data cutoff. Notable patient characteristics of this cohort compared to the larger D-RVd cohort include median age of diagnosis 59 v 61, 64% v 54.6% male, 48% vs 41.7% black, RISS 3 30% v 6.1% and HR 27% v 15.4%, respectively. Post-induction, comparative overall response rates (ORR) between patients with early relapse and the overall cohort was 97.8 v 99.6% with a ≥VGPR of 70.4 v 86.5%, respectively. Post-transplant, the ≥VGPR of 84.2% v 95.6%. Median time to progression was 22.7 months. Most common first-line therapies after relapse included daratumumab, carfilzomib, dexamethasone (DKd) (n=14, 32%), daratumumab, pomalidomide, dexamethasone (DPd) (n=8, 18%), and carfilzomib, pomalidomide, dexamethasone (KPd) (n=5, 11%). The median OS has not been reached. Estimated 3 year survival is 82%. PFS2, MRD status, risk based on updated IMS definitions and multivariate analysis with updated follow up will be presented at the meeting.

Discussion:

D-RVd is a highly effective induction regimen that can lead to impressive long-term outcomes, however, there remains a patient population that does not experience this same benefit. This is the largest real world dataset of patients treated with D-RVd induction with data on patients with early progression. Patient with early progression were more likely to be male, have R-ISS 3 and HR disease, and though a majority of patients achieved VGPR, it was comparatively less than the overall cohort. Further study is needed to better understand and identify this cohort of patients early so that there can be consideration of alternative treatment approaches to optimize outcomes.

Disclosures: Joseph: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; J&J Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hofmeister: Sanofi: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dhodapkar: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lava Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lonial: AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, GSK, Janssen Biotech Inc, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics Inc (no cancer agents currently): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen Biotech Inc, Novartis, Takeda: Research Funding. Nooka: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectis: Research Funding; ONK Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aduro Biotech: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Arch Oncology: Research Funding; Sebia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; K36 Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cellectar Biosciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Kaufman: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy; Sebia: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ascentage: Consultancy, Honoraria.

*signifies non-member of ASH