-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1641 A Prospective Analysis of Outcomes Following Successive Lines of Treatment in Mantle Cell Lymphoma in an Unselected Previously Untreated Population: The UK MCL Biobank

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 623. Mantle Cell, Follicular, Waldenstrom’s, and Other Indolent B Cell Lymphomas: Clinical and Epidemiological: Poster I
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Lymphomas, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Clinical Research, Diseases, Indolent lymphoma, Real-world evidence, Lymphoid Malignancies
Saturday, December 7, 2024, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM

Sarah Mant1*, Georgina Naylor1*, Nicola Crosbie1*, Sree Aroori2*, Mark J Bishton, PhD, MBChB3, Kristian Bowles, MBBS, PhD4, Safia Dawi5*, Toby A. Eyre6*, Wendy Ingram2*, Abigail Martin1*, Christopher McNamara, MD7*, Melanie Oates8*, Andrew Pettitt, MD, PhD8*, Claire Scully2*, Brian Wainman2*, Mark Warner2*, Simon Rule, MD9* and David John Lewis, MD1*

1University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
2Plymouth University, Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit, Plymouth, United Kingdom
3Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK, United Kingdom
4Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
5Hull University Teaching Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
6Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Old Road, United Kingdom
7University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
8Department of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
9Executive Director, Haematology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Background

Novel treatments for Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) have led to improvements in overall survival (OS). Despite this MCL remains incurable; almost all patients will relapse and require multiple lines of treatment. There is a paucity of prospective, real-world data characterising the outcome of relapsed MCL patients following subsequent treatment lines.

Methods

The MCL Biobank Observational study is a prospective study with all patients over the age of 16 years with newly diagnosed MCL being eligible. Recruitment was open across 73 UK sites between October 2014-19. Patients were enrolled prior to receiving systemic therapy with no specific exclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics were collected. The primary outcome measure was time to treatment (TTT). Data was collected on treatment choice and date of treatment lines. OS and TTT/death were assessed using the Kaplan Meier method. Prespecified subgroup analysis was performed on patients by age group: < 65, 65-80 and > 80 years. Event free survival (EFS) was defined as TTNT/death following the initiation of each line of therapy. POD24 was defined as POD within 24 months of commencement of 1L therapy. The log-rank test was used to compare survival between subgroups.

Results

A total of 588 patients were recruited. Median follow up is 5.7 years. The median age was 70 years (range 30-93), 72% were male. 497 (84.1%) had stage III/IV disease and simplified MIPI was low, intermediate and high in 112 (20%), 227 (41%) and 220 (39%) respectively. 507 (86.2%) patients were treated at a median TTT of 1.4 months (range:0-80). 507 received first line (1L) treatment, 149 (29.4%) received second line (2L), 33 (6.5%) received third line, 9 (1.8%) received fourth line, 2 (0.4%) received over 4 lines of treatment. 120 (23.8%) patients received a line of treatment within clinical trial. 6 (1.0%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

The median OS and EFS after 1L treatment was 69.5 and 46.0 months (mo) respectively. POD 24 (n=102) was associated with shorter OS (P=<0.001, med. OS 25.3 vs 70.1 mo) and shorter EFS following 2L treatment (P=0.02, 9.8 vs 24.3 mo). 127 (25.0%) patients died after 1L treatment with no 2L treatment; 54 (42.5%) died of lymphoma and 67 (52.8%) died of other causes (cause unknown n=6).

Following 2L treatment median OS and EFS was 20.3 and 15.0 mo respectively. 75 (50.3%) patients died with no 3L treatment; 54 (72%) died of lymphoma and 13 (17.3%) died of other causes (unknown n=8). Following 3L treatment median OS and EFS was 6.7 and 6.7 mo respectively and 4.5 and 2.6 mo following 4L treatment. Age <65 years was associated with a longer OS and EFS after 1L treatment but not after subsequent lines.

Choice of 1L treatment had a significant effect on OS (P=<0.01). The most frequent 1L treatments were NORDIC (24.9%), Bendamustine containing regimes (23.9%) (R-Bendamustine n=95.0%), R-CHOP (20.0%) and BTKi containing regimens (16.4%). Median OS was 69.1 mo in patients receiving BTKi containing regimes, 48.0 mo in Bendamustine containing regimens (R-Bendamustine=95.0%), 52.1 mo with R-CHOP. Median OS was not reached in patients receiving NORDIC or high dose cytarabine containing regimens. Of patients receiving NORDIC 1L 78 (61.9%) underwent autologous stem cell transplant.

The most frequent 2L treatment was a BTKi alone or in combination with rituximab (n=119, 79.9%). Amongst patients receiving 2L treatment following 1L BTKi (n=15), EFS was 10.5 mo (46.7%=RBAC, 26.7%=RCHOP, 3.3%=R-Bendamustine, 6.7%=Bendamustine and 6.7%=RDHAP).

In January 2021 CART for MCL was approved as 3L treatment in the UK following chemotherapy and Ibrutinib. Of 11 patients that relapsed following two prior lines of treatment from this time, four (36.4%) had CART as 3 or 4L treatment.

Conclusion

This prospective analysis confirms a progressive reduction in survival and response with successive treatment lines for relapsed MCL. This patient-level longitudinal follow up highlights the need to optimise 1L treatment. Advancing age impacts OS and TTNT/death following 1L treatment. Time to POD from 1L treatment was associated with OS. RBAC was the most common 2L treatment following 1L BTKi.

Disclosures: Crosbie: Abbvie: Honoraria. Eyre: Beigene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche, Gilead, KITE, Janssen, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Loxo Oncology, Beigene, Incyte, Autolus, Galapagos: Consultancy; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene, AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Roche, Gilead, KITE, Janssen, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Loxo Oncology, Beigene: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Trial steering committee; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel to scientific conferences; Roche, Gilead, KITE, Takeda, Janssen, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Loxo Oncology, Beigene, Incyte, Autolus, Galapagos, Medscape, PeerView, Clinical Care Options, The Limbic: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel to scientific conferences, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Secura Bio: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rule: Astrazeneca: Current Employment. Lewis: Janssen, Lilly, Roche, BeiGene, Kite, Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria.

*signifies non-member of ASH