Session: 621. Lymphomas: Translational – Molecular and Genetic: Poster III
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Translational Research, Lymphomas, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Bispecific Antibody Therapy, B Cell lymphoma, Genomics, Diseases, Aggressive lymphoma, Treatment Considerations, Biological therapies, Lymphoid Malignancies, Biological Processes, Technology and Procedures, Measurable Residual Disease , Molecular testing
Methods: Included in this study were 41 R/R LBCL patients treated at our center in the pivotal trial or a compassionate use protocol. We analyzed ctDNA by CAPP-Seq at baseline (n=41) and cycle 3 (n=39) with paired wild-type germline DNA to filter out polymorphisms and sequencing errors. We used a targeted enrichment strategy focused on a panel of 155 genes (370 Kb) recurrently mutated in B-cell lymphoma. Ultra-deep-next generation sequencing was performed on an Illumina platform. A bioinformatic pipeline was applied to call non-synonymous somatic mutations using the somatic function of VarScan2. The ctDNA load was calculated as haploid genome equivalent per ml (hGE/ml) of plasma; the log 10-fold change (log-FC) of ctDNA was determined as the logarithm of the ratio between the loads at cycle 3 and baseline.
Results: The median age of the patients was 67 years (range 22-86), with 61% being male and 76% having advanced-stage disease. The median number of prior treatments was 3 (range 1-7), with 61% of the patients being primary refractory and 20% receiving CAR-T therapy. The median baseline ctDNA load was 331.6 hGE/ml (range 27-14,804). A higher ctDNA value was significantly associated with bulky disease (p=0.001) and high IPI (p=0.04). A greater log-FC was strongly correlated with metabolic CR, both at cycle 3 (p<.0001) or EOT (p<.0001).
At cycle 3, stratification of patients (n=39) based on ctDNA detection revealed a significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with undetectable (n=23) compared to detectable (n=16) ctDNA (26.4 vs. 2.5 months, respectively; p<.0001). Notably, none of the patients with detectable ctDNA at cycle 3 achieved CR at EOT. Furthermore, all 3 patients with a partial metabolic response and detectable ctDNA progressed before EOT. In contrast, 3 out of 4 patients with undetectable ctDNA achieved CR.
In this cohort, genes mutated in more than 21% of R/R LBCL cases included TP53 (44%), KMT2D, PIM1, and IGLL5 (37% each), CARD11 (27%), HIST1H1E and CREBBP (24% each), and BCL2 (22%). Patients with TP53 mutations (44%; 18/41) and those with wild-type TP53 (56%; 23/41) demonstrated comparable PFS. Interestingly, analysis of TP53 mutation status at cycle 3 was possible in 17 of 18 cases and was highly predictive of outcomes. All 8 patients with persistent TP53 mutations experienced progression, whereas 8 of 9 patients with undetectable TP53 achieved CR (p=0.0004).
Conclusions: Analysis of ctDNA in patients with R/R LBCL receiving Glofitamab allows early identification of non-responsive patients. The presence of detectable ctDNA at cycle 3 is a strong biomarker of progression at EOT, specifically in patients with a partial metabolic response. The persistence of TP53 mutations at cycle 3 predicts disease progression, whereas their absence correlates with CR at EOT. These findings highlight the potential of ctDNA in providing clinically meaningful information with a key role in the therapeutic optimization of Glofitamab-containing treatment strategies.
Disclosures: Pirosa: BeiGene: Honoraria, Other: travel grant; Janssen: Other: travel grant. Korfi: Roche: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bottos: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Rossi: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Janssen, Lilly: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie, Adaptive, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Janssen: Research Funding. Carlo-Stella: Gilead: Honoraria; SOBI: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Scenic Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Humanitas University, Milano (Italy): Current Employment; AstraZeneca, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Janssen Oncology, Takeda, Novartis, ADC Therapeutics, Roche, Gilead, SOBI, Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi, ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi: Research Funding; Sanofi, ADC Therapeutics, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Roche, Novartis, Scenic Biotech, Janssen Oncology, Merck Sharp & Dohme, SOBI, AbbVie, Genmab, AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts