-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

3524 Sociodemographic and Patient-Related Determinants of Outcomes after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide-Based GvHD Prophylaxis

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 722. Allogeneic Transplantation: Acute and Chronic GVHD and Immune Reconstitution: Poster II
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Treatment Considerations, Biological therapies, Transplantation (Allogeneic and Autologous)
Sunday, December 8, 2024, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM

Sibgha Gull Chaudhary, MD1,2,3*, Moazzam Shahzad, MD1,4, Kayla Pfannenstiell3*, Muhammad Kashif Amin, MD1,2,3*, Amir Kasaeian1,3*, Muhammad Fareed Khalid, MD1,3*, Hediyeh Alemi1,3*, Naghmeh Khavandgar1,3*, Iqra Anwar, MBBS1,3*, Matthew McGuirk1,3*, Syed Nasir Abbas Bukhari1,3*, Anurag K. Singh, MD1,2,3, Mehdi Hamadani, MD1,5, Joseph P. McGuirk, DO1,2,3 and Muhammad Umair Mushtaq1,2,3

1Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Health Consortium, Kansas City, KS
2US Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Kansas City, KS
3Division of Hematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
4Department of Oncological Sciences, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
5Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a crucial therapy option for several hematological disorders. Sociodemographic factors, performance status, and comorbidities significantly affect post-transplant outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of these sociodemographic and patient-related factors on outcomes following haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT) using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy)-based graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis.

Methods: A retrospective multicenter analysis was conducted, including haplo HCT recipients with PT-Cy-based GVHD prophylaxis in the publicly available Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant (CIBMTR) registry from 2012 to 2017 using P5737 data by Ustun et al. We examined the impact of recipient age, gender, and ethnicity, donor age and gender match, ethnicity, cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, Karnofsky's performance status (KPS), and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), grade II-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS). Patient-, disease- and transplant-related factors were compared between groups using the Chi-square test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon two-sample test for continuous variables. The median follow-up duration was estimated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed. The hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Variables with p-values <0.2 in univariable analysis and the clinically relevant variables were included in the multivariable models. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata version 18, and significance was defined as p<0.05.

Results: We included 550 patients who received haplo-HCT with PT-Cy-based GVHD prophylaxis. The median age was 59.8 years, and 59% (n=327) were male. The graft source was peripheral blood in 62.5% (n=344) and bone marrow in 37.5% (n=206) of patients. The primary hematologic malignancies included acute myeloid leukemia (54%, n=297), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (17%, n=91), and myelodysplastic syndrome (29%, n=158). Ethnicities were Caucasian (63.5%, n=349), African American (20%, n=108), Hispanic (9.5%, n=52), and Asian and others (7%, n=41). The conditioning regimen was myeloablative in 38% (n=207) of patients. The KPS was 90% or higher in 47% (n=257) of patients. The HCT-CI of less than three was noted in 50% (n=274) of patients. The median follow-up time was 3.83 years (95% CI 3.17-3.94). The median OS, DFS, and GRFS were 2.05 years (95% CI 1.48-3.20), 0.86 years (95% CI 0.69-1.09), and 0.30 years (95% CI 0.25-0.35). Incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, relapse, and mortality were 35% (n=193), 32% (n=175), 42.5% (n=234), and 45% (n=248). After adjusting for significant variables in multivariate regression analysis, significant predictors of outcomes included - OS: female gender (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.90, p=0.011), CMV donor/recipient-negative (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.89, p=0.013), HCT-CI >=5 (HR 1.84, 95% CI, 1.14-2.97, p=0.012); DFS: female gender (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 - 0.87, p=0.006), CMV donor/recipient-negative (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.99, p=0.043), HCT-CI >=5 (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.16-2.78, p=0.009); GRFS: female gender (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.98, p=0.035), CMV donor/recipient-negative (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56-0.99, p=0.044); relapse: none; NRM: female gender (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36 - 0.98, p=0.040), CMV donor/recipient-negative (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.77, p=0.005); grade II-IV acute GVHD: Asian vs. Caucasian ethnicity (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.65, p=0.005); and chronic GVHD: Asian vs. Caucasian ethnicity (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.84, p=0.017).

Conclusion: Our study has evaluated the impact of sociodemographic and patient-related factors on outcomes following haploidentical HCT using PT-Cy-based GVHD prophylaxis. We have identified female gender, CMV-negative serostatus, lower comorbidity index, and Asian ethnicity as predictors of superior post-transplant outcomes. Further studies are warranted to address and mitigate these risk factors with patient-centered interventions and tailored selection of disease- and transplant-related factors to improve post-transplant outcomes.

Disclosures: Hamadani: DMC, Inc: Speakers Bureau; CRISPR: Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Allovir: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Forte Biosciences: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy; Byondis: Consultancy; CRISPR: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Caribou: Consultancy; Myeloid Therapeutics: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. McGuirk: Allo Vir: Consultancy; Legend biotech: Consultancy; Sana technologies: Consultancy; CRISPR therapeutics: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; Envision: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Caribou bio: Consultancy; NEKTAR therapeutics: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Mushtaq: Iovance Biotherapeutics: Research Funding.

*signifies non-member of ASH