Proteomic Determinants of Renal Organ Response in AL Amyloidosis

Background: Beside fibril-forming proteins, amyloid deposits contain other proteins which can influence organ toxicity, disease initiation and clearance. We investigated the association between the amyloid plaque proteomic signature of diagnostic renal biopsies from patients achieving deep and sustained hematologic remissions and renal organ response in AL amyloidosis.

Methods: Retrospective study of newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients between 2010-2020. Patients were eligible if; (1) they had a baseline renal biopsy which had undergone laser micro-dissection and mass spectrometry, (2) were assessable for renal response [RenR, non-selective proteinuria ≥1g /24 hours, predominantly albumin], (3) were not on renal replacement therapy and did not experience renal progression within 3-months of diagnosis and (4) had RenR measurements, at least twice annually in the first year from treatment and annually thereafter. Patients who did not obtain a renal complete response (RenCR) required a hematologic very good partial response (VGPR) or better within 6 months of treatment initiation, sustained for a minimum of 6 months. Hematological and renal responses were graded according to consensus criteria. Overrepresentation analyses of differentially expressed proteins were performed using the WebGestalt 2019 and the reactome pathway database. A false detection rate corrected p value <0.05 was used to identify significantly overrepresented proteins and pathways.

Results: We defined two organ response categories, to capture the extreme ends of the spectrum: renal suboptimal responders (n=24), patients for whom the best renal response was ≤partial response (RenPR), and renal complete responders (n=29), patients who obtained a RenCR at best response. Overall, the median follow-up was 6.7 years (IQR: 5.4-9.2), 6.6 years (IQR: 5.4-8.1) for complete responders, and 8.4 years (IQR: 6.1-11.3) for suboptimal responders. Between renal suboptimal responders and complete responders there was no significant difference in median age (63 vs 63 years, p=0.7), lambda light chain isotype (66% vs 79%, p=0.3), first-line therapy received and renal stage (Stage III: 14% vs 8%, p=0.9). The median time to RenCR was 52-months (IQR: 31-63). Protein pathways over-represented in renal complete responders included 14-3-3 proteins (YWHAG, YWHAH, YWHAQ, YWHAZ), early components of the complement cascade and complement regulatory proteins (C3, C4A, C4B, C8A, complement factor H), keratins, cytoskeletal proteins (tubulin, actin, filamen) and collagen IV. Protein pathways over-represented in renal suboptimal responders included terminal/effector components of the complement cascade (C5, C6, C8B, C9), amyloid signature proteins (ApoA1 and E, vitronectin, clusterin), proteoglycans (heparan sulfate proteoglycan), transgelin and metallopeptidase inhibitor 3. Proteins with the highest-fold increase in renal complete responders included serine protease inhibitor (SERPINA3) and F-box and leucine rich repeat protein (FBXL6), 9.0 x 10⁶ & 7.7-fold, respectively. Proteins with the highest-fold increase in renal suboptimal responders included complement 6 and 8B, 3.5 & 3.6-fold, respectively.

Conclusion: This is the first study to identify proteomic determinants of organ response in AL amyloidosis. Molecular chaperones involved in protein aggregate homeostasis, such as the 14-3-3 proteins are upregulated in renal complete responders, similar to what we have shown in our prior work. This suggests that organ responders may have a more favorable microenvironment which “primes” them for organ response after the amyloidogenic light chain has been cleared from the circulation. Renal suboptimal responders (≤RenPR) have elevated levels of terminal complement proteins including membrane attack complex proteins and reduced levels of early components or complement regulatory proteins, which may be responsible for reno-toxic and reno-protective effects, respectively.