-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

3116 Zanubrutinib Combined with R-CHOP in Previously Untreated Non-Germinal Center B-Cell (GCB) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Patients with BCL2 and MYC Protein Co-Expression: A Multicenter, Phase II Study

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 627. Aggressive Lymphomas: Pharmacologic Therapies: Poster II
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Clinical trials, Adult, Lymphomas, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Clinical Research, Diseases, Lymphoid Malignancies, Study Population, Human
Sunday, December 8, 2024, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM

Jia Jin1,2, Yalan Wang3*, Xi Wang3*, Yonghong Tang4*, Shan Zeng4*, Juan Du, MD, PhD5 and Junning Cao1,2

1Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
2Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
3Department of Lymphoma, Baotou Tumor Hospital, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China
4Department of Internal Oncology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
5Department of Lymphoma, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China

Introduction: DLBCL is the most common subtype of lymphoma, accounting for up to 40% of lymphoma cases worldwide and can be classified into GCB and non-GCB by immunohistochemistry (IHC). R-CHOP is the standard first-line treatment of DLBCL. Patients with non-GCB DLBCL or co-expression of BCL2 and MYC have a worse outcome with R-CHOP treatment. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the new-generation BTKi zanubrutinib combined with R-CHOP in previously untreated non-GCB DLBCL patients with BCL2 and MYC protein co-expression. At 2023 ASH, preliminary efficacy and safety results of 27 patients were reported. As of cut-off date, all 44 patients have been enrolled, and here, we report the updated results.

Methods: Eligible patients were previously untreated non-GCB DLBCL confirmed by Hans’ algorithm, aged 18 years or older, MYC positive (defined as ≥40%) and BCL-2 positive (defined as ≥50%) determined by IHC, and ECOG PS of 0-2. Patients were treated with R-CHOP combined with zanubrutinib (160 mg, PO, BID) of each 21-day cycle for 6 cycles. After 4 cycles, response was assessed by CT per Lugano 2014 criteria, and patients who had PD would discontinue the treatment. After completion of 6 cycles treatment, patients who were assessed with CR (by PET-CT) would proceed to zanubrutinib (160 mg, PO, BID) maintenance treatment for up to one year, or until PD, intolerance of toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was 3-year EFS rate assessed by investigator, defined as the time from the start of treatment until disease progression, relapse after CR, initiation of subsequent systemic anti-tumor treatment due to PET-positive or biopsy-confirmed residual disease after 6 cycles of treatment, or death from any cause. Secondary endpoints included ORR, CR rate, 3-year PFS rate, 3-year OS rate and safety. The safety analysis set (SAS) included all subjects who received at least one dose of R-CHOP plus zanubrutinib. The efficacy analysis set (EAS) consisted of all subjects in SAS who had at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation.

Results: From Jan 2022 to Jun 2024, 44 patients were enrolled with a median age of 60.2 (33.2-79.1), 50% (22/44) were male, and 54.5% (25/44) were with IPI ≥3. At the data cut-off date of 30 Jun 2024 (median follow-up: 14.88 mo), SAS included 44 patients, EAS included 40 patients. Thirty-nine patients received 4 treatment cycles and were assessed by CT with CR (n=15) or partial response (n=24); 1 patient experienced symptomatic progression and was confirmed PD by CT at cycle 2, and thus discontinued study treatment. Among the 39 patients, 37 patients completed 6 cycles of treatment and achieved objective response (37/37), with 34 CRs (CR and complete metabolic response) and 3 PRs. Patients with CR proceeded to zanubrutinib maintenance treatment, while 3 patients with PR received salvage therapy decided by the investigator. The median maintenance treatment period was 6.57 (range, 0.33-17.41) mo, and the response was well maintained with CR for all the 34 patients. Eight patients have completed the study treatment and have entered the follow-up phase. The most common hematologic TEAEs were neutropenia (grade 1-2: 21/44, 47.7%; grade ≥3: 1/44, 2.3%) and thrombocytopenia (grade 1-2: 11/44, 25.0%; grade ≥3: 3/44, 6.8%), and non-hematologic TEAEs included alanine aminotransferase increased (grade 1-2: 9/44, 20.5%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (grade 1-2: 5/44, 11.4%), hypokalemia (grade 1-2: 6/44, 13.6%; grade ≥3: 1/44, 2.3%), anemia (grade 1-2: 7/44, 15.9%), infectious pneumonia (grade 1-2: 5/44 11.4%; grade ≥3: 3/44, 6.8%) and hemorrhage (grade 1-2: 8/44, 18.2%; grade ≥3: 1/44, 2.3%). Patients with grade 1/2 AEs were recovered without any special treatment. One patient had hypertension of grade 2 and recovered. No atrial fibrillation/flutter or other cardiovascular events were observed during the treatment. Twelve patients experienced SAEs of thrombocytopenia (n=6), neutropenia (n=2), infectious pneumonia (n=3), and hyperglycemia (n=1), and were recovered.

Conclusions: Zanubrutinib plus R-CHOP followed by zanubrutinib maintenance was well tolerated and showed promising responses in untreated non-GCB double-expression DLBCL patients. The study is ongoing and further survival results will be continuously released.

Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

*signifies non-member of ASH