-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

355 Direct Visualisation of BCMA Bispecific Antibody and the Myeloma Immune Microenvironment

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Type: Oral
Session: 651. Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Dyscrasias: Basic and Translational: Understanding and Improving TCE and CAR-T Cell Therapies for Plasma Cell Disorders
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Fundamental Science
Saturday, December 7, 2024: 4:00 PM

Jeremy Er1,2, Rimes Joel, BSc, PhD2*, Light Amanda, BSc2*, Mark R Dowling, MBBS, PhD3, Simon J Harrison, MBBS, PhD4,5 and Edwin Hawkins, BSc, PhD2*

1Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Melbourne, AUS
2Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
3Centre of Excellence for Cellular Immunotherapy and Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
4Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
5Clinical Haematology and Centre of Excellence for Cellular Immunotherapy, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Introduction: Multiple myeloma is haematological malignancy that remains difficult to cure despite recent therapeutic advances. Novel T cell redirecting therapies such as CAR-T cells and bispecific antibodies have shown promising efficacy in the relapse setting However, durable responses have yet to be achieved. Mechanisms of resistance and the dynamics of immune cell interactions within the bone marrow remain poorly defined. Here, we used in situ imaging of the bone marrow in living mice (intravital imaging) to characterise immune cell interactions with myeloma in the context of murine BCMA bispecific antibody therapy.

Methods: We used a traceable myeloma cell line derived from the spontaneous Vk*MYC mouse model (Vk14451-GFP) that recapitulates human disease. To visualise the cytotoxic immune response, Vk14451 cells were transplanted into recipient mice where CD8 T cells were labelled with fluorescent tomato protein (E8I-Cre tomato). >Five weeks post-transplant, multi-day intravital imaging of the calvarium bone marrow was performed using 2-photon microscopy. This imaging approach was performed in the absence or presence of murine BCMA bispecific antibody. Mice were treated with 1 to 4 doses of the bispecifc antibody to visualise immune and myeloma responses.

Results: Direct visualisation of T cells in situ in the absence of therapeutic intervention revealed CD8 T cells were excluded from areas of myeloma infiltration. Furthermore, CD8 T cells that gained entry to tumour had significantly altered cell interactions compared to T cells in healthy bone marrow. Following administration of a dose of bispecific antibody, we observed drastic changes in the biology and spatial distribution of CD8 T cells within the bone marrow. Surprisingly, following activation the immunosuppressive myeloma microenvironment had no effect on the ability of CD8 T cells to engage with myeloma cells within tumour foci and undergo rapid expansion. However, we observed significant changes in the persistence of T cells within the myeloma foci. In addition, in cohorts of mice that received repeated dosing of bispecific antibody, we observed loss of tumour control. In these mice, we still observed access of T cells to the tumour foci and active proliferation. However, we did not observe sustained interactions and active killing of MM cells suggesting development of a tumour agnostic state of T cells.

Conclusion: This dynamic analysis of immune cell interactions with myeloma within the bone marrow microenvironment suggests that targeting persistence of activated T cells may play a key role in the therapeutic efficacy of T cell redirecting therapies.

Declaration: This research was supported by Bristol Myers Squibb. The company had no role in analysing the data or preparing the abstract

Disclosures: Er: Abbvie: Patents & Royalties. Dowling: Novartis: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; Abbvie: Patents & Royalties. Harrison: Genetech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Haematologix: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Terumo BCT: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eusa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Previous Abstract | Next Abstract >>
*signifies non-member of ASH