-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

350 Long-Term Response Analysis of Transfusion Independence in Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agent–Naive Patients with Very Low-, Low-, or Intermediate-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Treated with Luspatercept Vs Epoetin Alfa in the COMMANDS Trial

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Type: Oral
Session: 637. Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Clinical and Epidemiological: Defining and Treating Low Risk MDS
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
MDS, Chronic Myeloid Malignancies, Diseases, Myeloid Malignancies
Saturday, December 7, 2024: 4:15 PM

Guillermo Garcia-Manero, MD1, Valeria Santini2*, Amer M. Zeidan, MBBS, MHS3, Rami S. Komrokji, MD4, Veronika Pozharskaya5*, Karen L. Keeperman5*, Yinzhi Lai5*, Barkha Aggarwal5*, Dimana Miteva6*, David Valcárcel Ferreiras7*, Pierre Fenaux, MD8, Jake Shortt9*, Matteo Giovanni Della Porta, MD10* and Uwe Platzbecker, MD11

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
2University of Florence Medical School, Florence, Italy
3Yale University School of Medicine and Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
4Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
5Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
6Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
7Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
8Service d'Hématologie Séniors, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université Paris 7, Paris, France
9Monash University, Clayton, AUS
10Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
11University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Introduction

Luspatercept has demonstrated durable clinical efficacy in patients (pts) with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who are red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent (TD). In the phase 3 COMMANDS trial (NCT03682536), in erythroid stimulating agent (ESA)-naive pts with lower-risk TD MDS, pts in the luspatercept arm had a significantly longer duration of response; with a median (95% CI) cumulative duration (sum of all ≥ 12-week RBC-transfusion independent [TI] response episodes [week 1–end of treatment (EOT)]) of 154.7 weeks (118.4–not estimable [NE]) compared with 91.1 weeks (73.1–123.9) in the epoetin alfa arm (P = 0.0016, Santini V, et al, EHA Library 2024. P785). Overall duration of response was also longer in the luspatercept arm for prespecified subgroups including pts who were ring sideroblast (RS)+ and RS– (Della Porta MG, et al. Lancet Haem 2024. In press). The aim of this analysis was to assess the long-term clinical value of luspatercept in COMMANDS, including extended RBC-TI and cumulative response.

Methods

Eligible pts were aged ≥ 18 years, had Revised International Prognostic Scoring System very low-, low-, or intermediate-risk MDS, were ESA-naive, and required RBC transfusions. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive luspatercept 1.0 mg/kg (titration up to 1.75 mg/kg) subcutaneously once every 3 weeks or epoetin alfa 450 IU/kg (titration up to 1050 IU/kg; maximum total dose 80,000 IU) subcutaneously once weekly. MDS disease status was assessed after 24 weeks; pts with clinical benefit (transfusion reduction ≥ 2 RBC units/8 weeks from baseline [BL] for any 8-week period in the 12 weeks prior to assessment and absence of disease progression) could continue treatment until unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or other discontinuation criteria. Cumulative duration of RBC-TI was defined as the sum of all durations of RBC-TI for ≥ 12 or ≥ 24 weeks from week 1 to EOT.

Results

BL characteristics were generally similar between luspatercept and epoetin alfa arms (Platzbecker U, et al. Lancet 2023). At data cutoff (Sept 22, 2023), 81/182 (44.5%) pts in the luspatercept arm and 50/181 (27.6%) pts in the epoetin alfa arm achieved a longest single RBC-TI period lasting ≥ 1 year, from week 1–EOT (common risk difference 16.7, 95% CI 7.2–26.1, P = 0.0003; odds ratio [OR] 2.2, 95% CI 1.4–3.5). Among pts with RBC-TI ≥ 12 weeks (luspatercept, 139/182 [76.4%]; epoetin alfa, 101/181 [55.8%]), cumulative RBC-TI ≥ 1 year was achieved by 90/139 (64.7%) and 55/101 (54.5%) pts in the luspatercept and epoetin alfa arms, respectively.

In all, 55 (30.2%) pts in the luspatercept arm and 25 (13.8%) pts in the epoetin alfa arm achieved a longest single RBC-TI period lasting ≥ 1.5 years (week 1–EOT; common risk difference 16.3, 95% CI 8.0–24.6, P < 0.0001; OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6–4.8). The ≥ 1.5 years RBC-TI benefit with luspatercept vs epoetin alfa was observed across prespecified subgroups, including those who were RS- (24.5% vs 16.0%; OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.6–4.6), had BL serum erythropoietin ≤ 200 U/L (35.9% vs 15.3%; OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.8–5.5), and had non-mutated SF3B1 (21.5% vs 13.9%; OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.7–4.2).

Progression to high-risk MDS occurred in 4 (2.2%) pts in the luspatercept arm and 6 (3.4%) pts in the epoetin alfa arm. Exposure-adjusted incidence rate (95% CI) for progression to high-risk MDS per 100 patient-years was 98.5 (37.0–262.5) in the luspatercept arm and 117.5 (52.8–261.6) in the epoetin alfa arm. In total, 7 (3.8%) pts in the luspatercept arm and 8 (4.4%) pts in the epoetin alfa arm progressed to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after randomization. Median time to AML progression was NE in either arm (P = 0.9621, HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.4–2.9).

Conclusions

In this analysis of long-term responses in the COMMANDS trial, luspatercept continued to demonstrate sustained and durable clinical benefit vs epoetin alfa, maintaining responses of ≥ 1.5 years across multiple clinically relevant subgroups including RS− status, low BL serum erythropoietin, and non-mutated SF3B1. Progression rates to high-risk MDS and AML were low in both treatment arms. These data support luspatercept as the treatment of choice in TD ESA-naive pts with lower-risk MDS.

Disclosures: Garcia-Manero: Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Astex: Other: Personal fees; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Helsinn: Other: Personal fees; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Genentech: Other: Personal fees; Astex: Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Amphivena: Research Funding. Santini: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Keros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeidan: Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Zentalis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Hikma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex: Research Funding; Syros: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kura: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lava Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Taiho: Consultancy, Honoraria; Treadwell: Consultancy, Honoraria; Faron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Akeso Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shattuck Labs: Research Funding; Vinerx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Orum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Chiesi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Schroedinger: Consultancy, Honoraria; ALX Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioCryst: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Keros: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sumitomo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Rigel: Consultancy, Honoraria; Regeneron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Notable: Consultancy, Honoraria; Medus: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Komrokji: Servier: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; DSI: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sumitomo Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servio: Honoraria; PharmaEssentia: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Rigel: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; DSI: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Taiho: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Geron: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; CTI biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pozharskaya: Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: Stock options with BMS; Merck: Other: Stock options with BMS. Keeperman: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Lai: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Aggarwal: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Miteva: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Fenaux: Astex: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding. Shortt: Astex/Taiho: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria; Astellas: Other: Advisory Board; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Otsuka: Other: Advisory Board. Della Porta: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Platzbecker: Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; MDS Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Geron: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

*signifies non-member of ASH