-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1808 Successful Treatment-Free Remission in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 632. Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Clinical and Epidemiological: Poster I
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Clinical Practice (Health Services and Quality)
Saturday, December 9, 2023, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM

Jerald P. Radich, MD1, Ines Garcia Gonzalez2*, Alicia Annamalay2*, Geoff Cook2*, Isaac Jenkins3*, Flora Duarte4*, VP Gangadharan5*, Hemant Malhotra, MD, FRCP6, Pankaj Malhotra, MD7, Karen Meliksetyan, MD8*, Rafael Zuniga4*, Nicholas Anthony Othieno-Abinja9*, Jose Zarza, MD, PhD10 and Pat Garcia-Gonzalez11*

1Translational Sciences & Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
2the Max Foundation, Seattle, WA
3Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, seattle, WA
4Centro de Cancer Emma Romero de Calleja, Tegucigalpa, Honduras
5VPS Lakeshore Hospital, Konchi, India
6Sri Ram Cancer Center, Jaipur, India
7Department of Clinical Hematology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India
8Hematology Center after Prof. Yeolyan, Yerevan, Armenia
9Nairobi Hospital Cancer Center, Nairobi, Kenya
10Universidad Nacional, San Lorenzo, Central, PRY
11The Max Foundation, Edmonds, WA

Introduction

Discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is feasible in a subset of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients who have maintained a deep molecular response (MR) for ≥2 years. Numerous TKI discontinuation trials from high-income settings show that ~50% of patients relapse after discontinuing TKIs and need to restart treatment. However, most patients with CML worldwide are from low- and middle-income countries LMIC where TKI access and molecular testing make routine care and attempts of treatment-free remission (TFR) problematic. The successful implementation of TFR in LMICs would benefit both CML patients as well as the health economics of each country. This analysis describes the experience of attempting TKI discontinuation in the LMIC setting.

Methods

The Max Foundation’s TFR Support Program provides financial and wrap-around support for patients attempting TFR in LMICs. The program operates in countries where The Max Foundation has existing partner institutions and physicians, imatinib and second line TKIs are available, and there is ≥1 reliable method of quantitative RT-PCR testing for BCR::ABL1. Eligible patients were >18 years old, diagnosed with chronic phase CML and treated with imatinib for ≥10 years with no history of resistance, and had a BCR-ABL level MR4.5 or better (≤0.0032%) for ≥12 months (m) as demonstrated by 2 RT-PCR tests. Patients who consented were enrolled in the program and monitored by their treating physician. Upon starting TFR, patients’ BCR::ABL1 levels were tested monthly for the first 6 m, then every 3 m for the following 6 m, then every 6 m. Patients who relapsed (BCR::ABL1 loss of MR3 or >0.1%) after beginning TFR restarted imatinib and were tested approximately every 1–3 m until they achieved MR3. We conducted a retrospective analysis on the outcomes of patients enrolled in The Max Foundation’s TFR Support Program to better understand TFR outcomes in an LMIC setting.

Results

The molecular results pre- and post-TKI discontinuation are shown in Figure 1. In total, 39 patients from sites in 5 countries (Armenia, Honduras, India, Kenya, and Paraguay) were followed by 8 program physicians. The mean age of the patients was 51 years (range, 22–77), with 22 females and 17 males. Patients had been on imatinib for an average of 15 years (range, 10–20). At time of discontinuation, all but 1 patient was on 400 mg/day of imatinib (1 treated at 300 mg/day). Thirty-two patients had undetectable BCR::ABL1 for both pre-discontinuation tests, 6 had one test with a value of <0.01%, and 1 had both tests detectable at <0.01%. Of the 39 patients, 32 remain actively followed, with 14 patients completing >12 m of follow-up. Nine patients had a molecular relapse (23%) with a BCR::ABL1 >0.1% IS after a median of 2 m of discontinuation (range, 1–18 m). Of these, 2 patients have not had repeat testing to confirm molecular relapse, and 1 patient became undetectable on follow-up 1 m later. None of these 3 patients have restarted TKI therapy. Seven of 39 patients (18%) have restarted TKI treatment. Of these 7 patients, 3 were restarted on TKI, but have not had a follow-up BCR::ABL1 evaluation. Of the remaining 4 patients who restarted TKI, 2 had no detectable BCR::ABL1 at the 9 m and 12 m follow-up, and 2 remain with evidence of BCR::ABL1 at 12 m and 17 m follow-up.

Conclusions

The data suggest that under conditions that allow frequent follow-up examination and testing, patients attempting TFR in LMIC have similar outcomes to those patients described in controlled clinical trials from academic settings in high-income countries. Additional confirmation of these findings will likely impact both the health of CML patients and the health economics in these LMICs.

Figure 1. BCR:ABL1 and outcomes following TKI discontinuation.


Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

*signifies non-member of ASH