-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

3128 Neurocognitive Outcomes over the First 3 Months after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR T) Therapy: Preliminary Findings from a Longitudinal Study

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 627. Aggressive Lymphomas: Clinical and Epidemiological: Poster II
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Biological therapies, Clinical Research, health outcomes research, Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Cell Therapies, patient-reported outcomes, real-world evidence, Therapies
Sunday, December 10, 2023, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM

Samantha J Mayo, PhD, RN1,2*, Kim Edelstein, PhD, CPsych2*, Lori Bernstein, PhD, CPsych2*, Tiana Coley, BS3*, Stacey Morrison, MSc2*, Abi Vijenthira, MD, MS3, Manjula Maganti4*, John Kuruvilla, MD, FRCPC3, Michael Crump, MD3*, Sita D. Bhella, MD3*, Robert Kridel3, Vishal Kukreti, MD, FRCP, MSc3, Chloe Yang, MD3*, Shabbir MH Alibhai, MD, MSc2*, Christine Chen, MHPE, MD, FRCPC3 and Anca Prica, MD, MSc3*

1Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
2Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
3Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
4Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada

Introduction

People treated with systemic therapies for cancer may exhibit changes in neurocognitive functioning over time, affecting domains such as memory, processing speed, and executive functioning. There is a need for prospective data regarding neurocognitive outcomes among patients treated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CAR T) therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trajectory of neurocognitive performance and self-reported cognitive functioning over the first 3 months of CAR T therapy.

Methods

As part of a larger cohort study of patients treated with CAR T, neurocognitive outcomes were assessed prior to starting CAR T and again at 1- and 3- months post-CAR T. Neurocognitive performance was measured using standardized neuropsychological tests including measures of verbal memory (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) – immediate recall, delayed recall, retention), processing speed (Trail-making Test - Part A (TMT-A)) and executive functioning (Trail-making Test Part B (TMT-B), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT)). Raw test scores were converted to z-scores (Mean 0, SD 1) based on norms adjusted for age, sex, and education, where applicable. Impairment on individual tests was defined by a z score ≤ -1.64. Participants were categorized as showing overall impairment if they had at least two tests with a z-score of ≤ -1.5 or a z-score ≤ -2.0 on one test. Self-reported cognitive functioning was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Cognition, Perceived Cognitive Impairment score (FACT-Cog3 PCI) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer – Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30, Cognitive Functioning scale (EORTC QLQ-C30 CF). Demographic and clinical data were collected through self-report and patient records. Frequencies of impairment were determined at each time point, with clinically significant changes on individual test scores in the first month determined based on z-score changes of ≥1.0 or minimal clinically important differences for self-report questionnaires. Linear mixed models were generated to estimate the trajectory of neurocognitive performance and self-reported cognitive functioning over time from baseline to 3 months.

Results

Neurocognitive outcomes were available for 37 participants at baseline, with follow-up data available for 29 patients at 1 month and 17 patients at 3 months. Participants were 54% male, had a mean age 58.4 years (sd 11.3) and a mean 15.5 years (sd 3.2) education. All patients had a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (53% diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 31% transformed DLBCL from follicular lymphoma). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) affected 32% of patients (5% Grade 4, 3% Grade 3, 8% Grade 2, 16% Grade 1). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) affected 97% of patients (3% Grade 3, 76% Grade 2, 19% Grade 1).

Frequency of overall impairment at each time point was 10/37 (27%) at baseline, 12/29 (41.4%) at 1 month, and 3/17 (17.6%) at 3 months. At each time point, impairment was most common on tests of executive functioning and memory. Based on individual test score changes between baseline and 1 month, rates of decline on individual tests of neurocognitive performance ranged from 11.5% (TMT-A) to 34.6% (COWAT). Decline on self-reported cognitive functioning was observed for 14.3% (FACT-Cog PCI) and 28.6% (EORTC QLQ-C30 CF) of participants.

Based on mixed models (Table 1), there was a statistically significant decline in estimated mean z-scores on a test of executive function (COWAT: -0.52, 95% CI -0.89-(-0.16), p=0.007) at 1-month compared to baseline. At three months, there was a statistically significant improvement in estimated mean z-scores on memory (HVLT-R immediate recall: 0.56, 95% CI 0.11-1.01, p=0.017) and executive functioning (TMT-B: 0.87, 95% CI 0.17-1.57, p=0.019; COWAT: 0.68, 95% CI 0.19-1.16, p=0.009) compared to baseline.

Conclusions

Impairment is present in a subgroup of patients prior to starting CAR T therapy. Patients may demonstrate declines on performance-based measures and report worsening cognitive symptoms in the first month after CAR T therapy, but also improved performance in some domains by three months. Enrollment and long-term follow-up of patients in this study is ongoing. Future analyses will explore differences in trajectories among subgroups, such as those who have experienced ICANS and CRS.

Disclosures: Kuruvilla: Roche, Astra Zeneca, Merck: Research Funding; Abbvie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Genmab, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Other: DSMB. Bhella: Sanofi: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Chen: AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events; Bristol Myers Squibb: Other: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events, Research Funding. Prica: Abbvie: Honoraria; Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria; Kite Gilead: Honoraria.

*signifies non-member of ASH