Session: 803. Emerging Tools, Techniques and Artificial Intelligence in Hematology: Poster I
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, clinical trials, Acute Myeloid Malignancies, AML, Translational Research, assays, Clinical Research, Diseases, Therapies, Myeloid Malignancies, emerging technologies, Technology and Procedures, profiling, molecular testing
Methods: The validation testing was performed by two harmonized laboratories; NCI Molecular Characterization laboratory (MoCha) and Fred Hutch Molecular Oncology (MO). We conducted analytical validation and harmonization experiments for CLIA/CAP and FDA regulatory compliant use in this trial across both accredited clinical laboratories with harmonized workflows. Samples are extracted with AllPrep per manufacture protocol. Library preparation with the Oncomine Myeloid Assay GX v2 and the sequencing reactions are performed on the automated Ion Torrent Genexus System. Sequencing data generated by NMAv2 was analyzed using Ion Torrent Genexus system version 6.6.2.1. The default manufacturer workflow has been customized using a custom designed hotspot browser extensible data (BED) file, sequence variant baseline (SVB) file, fusion target file, torrent variant caller (TVC) version 5.18 and Oncomine extended filter chain (OEFC) version 5.16. In NMA, the default 2.5%, and 3% VAFs were set up for calling hotspot and non-hotspots SNV/indel, 1% VAF for FLT3-ITD and 100 read counts for all fusion, except 2000 read counts for KMT2A-PTD.
Results: The validation set included 148 unique samples and comprised of 76 AML/MDS patients (49 peripheral blood, 27 bone marrow aspirate), 51 healthy donor blood, 6 healthy donor bone marrow, 7 cancer cell lines, 5 normal HapMap cell lines, and 3 contrived materials encompassing 364 known mutations (143 SNPs, 132 indels, 27 fusions). 180 runs were completed for this validation (106 at FH and 74 at MoCha) with 89.44% success rate in passing run level metrics. Results of the validation testing are detailed in Table 1. High reproducibility in detecting all reportable variants was observed, with overall >99% mean positive percentage agreement (PPA) across both labs (Figure 1). The limit of detection for each variant type was <0.06% for hotspot SNVs, 0.07% for non-hotspot SNVs, 0.51% for hotspot indels, ~1% for non-hotspot indels, 0.23% for FLT3-ITDs, and 50 minimum reads at 0.1% tumor content for fusions. 99.39% concordance was observed by testing 86 blinded validation sample set with analytically validated orthogonal assays.
Conclusions: The NMAv2 has high specificity, sensitivity, accuracy and reproducibility (inter-lab and intra-lab) with sequencing results generated within 48 hours of assay initiation. As such, the assay is well suited for use to rapidly categorize the genomic alteration of AML to support clinical care in patients with active myeloid malignancies, including those patients potentially enrolled in the myeloMATCH program.
Table 1: Results of validation experiment results for the NMAv2
Figure 1: Harmonization results for the NMAv2 between MoCha and MO labs, Right Panel = Indel; Left panel = SNV
Disclosures: Yeung: Twinstrands: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Thermo Fisher: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Kineta: Research Funding; OBI: Research Funding; Sensei: Research Funding.
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts