Session: 614. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemias: Therapies, Excluding Transplantation and Cellular Immunotherapies: Poster III
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Combination therapy, Therapies, therapy sequence, Minimal Residual Disease
Methods. Post-consolidation treatment was left to the treating physicians and all the information has been collected in the GIMEMA LAL2217 ancillary study. Sixty-three patients were enrolled (median age 54 years, range 24-82); 2 patients withdrew from the trial, 1 died in CHR and 1 relapsed after induction due to a major protocol violation6,7.
Results. After the primary endpoint, molecular responses increased further following additional blinatumomab cycles, being 75, 77, 70, 85, 90 and 93% at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months from the last blinatumomab cycle. At a prolonged follow-up, a persistent molecular negativity was found with 78.3, 73.1, 85, 87.4, 94.2, 90.2, 86.6 and 86.7% of responders at 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 42 and 48 months in the evaluable population.
At a median follow-up of 53 months, DFS and OS are 75.8% and 80.7% (Figure 1). A significantly better DFS and OS was observed in the 17 patients in molecular response at the end of induction (EOI) (100%) vs cases who were not (42) (68.6%) (p=0.016 and 0.036, respectively). These patients have so far not relapsed. After 2 blinatumomab cycles, DFS and OS did not differ between molecular (33) and non-molecular (22) responders: 82.9% and 89.4% vs 75.7% and 84.2%, underlying the effect of blinatumomab. A worse DFS from the EOI was recorded for IKZF1plus patients (11; 45.5%) compared to those without IKZF1 deletion (25; 82.3%) or with IKZF1 only deletions (13; 74%) (p=0.029). Similar results were observed also for OS. A similar trend was observed also when DFS was calculated from the primary endpoint of the study (62.5% vs 84.8% vs 74%). The 4 patients with a concomitant IKZF1plus signature and T315I mutation had the worse outcome.
After induction/consolidation, 29 patients continued treatment only with a TKI; 27 (93.1%) had obtained a deep molecular response after dasatinib/blinatumomab. Overall, 28 patients (96.5%) who did not receive systemic chemotherapy/transplant are in persistent CHR at a median follow-up of 48 months. Of the 24 patients transplanted in 1st CHR, 13 (54.2%) were non-molecular responders at the primary endpoint and only 2 became molecularly negative after further blinatumomab. Twenty patients (83.3%) are alive in CHR at a median follow-up of 49 months, 1 has relapsed 1 month after the transplant and 3 have died of complications. Three/6 patients transplanted in 2nd CHR are alive at 30, 40 and 52 months. The transplant-related mortality was 12.5% for patients transplanted in 1st CHR and 13.7% overall.
Nine relapses have occurred: 4 hematologic, 4 involving the CNS and 1 nodal. The median time to relapse was 4.4 months (1.9-25.8). A IKZF1plus signature, evaluated at diagnosis, was present in 4/8 evaluable cases. ABL1 mutations, evaluated on BM samples at relapse or at a concomitant MRD increase in extra-hematologic recurrences, were found in 7 cases.
Treatment was well tolerated with no unexpected long-term toxicities.
Conclusions. The final analysis of the D-ALBA study shows that a chemotherapy-free induction/consolidation regimen based on a targeted strategy and immunotherapy is feasible and effective in inducing durable long-term hematologic and molecular responses in Ph+ ALL patients of all ages. Half of the patients remained only on a TKI and never underwent systemic chemotherapy or a transplant. These results pave the way for a new era in the treatment of adult Ph+ ALL patients.
- Vignetti et al, Blood 2007
- Foà et al, Blood 2011
- Chiaretti et al, Haematologica 2016
- Chiaretti et al, Haematologica 2021
- Martinelli et al, Blood Advances 2022
- Foà et al, N Engl J Med 2020
- Foà & Chiaretti, N Engl J Med 2022
Disclosures: Ferrara: ABBVIE: Honoraria. Mulè: ABBVIE: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria. Bonifacio: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Clinigen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fracchiolla: Abbvie, Jazz, Pfizer, Amgen: Other: travel grants; Abbvie, Jazz, Pfizer, Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Rambaldi: Roche: Honoraria, Other: support for attending meetings & participation on a safety advisory board; Kite-Gilead: Honoraria, Other: support for attending meetings & participation on a safety advisory board; Incyte: Honoraria, Other: Support for attending meetings & participation on a safety advisory board; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Support for attending meetings & participation on a data safety monitoring board; Jazz: Honoraria, Other: support for attending meetings & participation on a data safety monitoring board; Astellas: Honoraria, Other: support for attending meetings & safety monitoring board; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Support for attending meetings & safety monitoring board; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Support for attending meetings & data safety monitoring; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Support for attending meetings & data safety monitoring; Abbvie: Honoraria; Omeros: Honoraria, Other: support for attending meetings & participation on a safety advisory board. Chiaretti: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.