Session: 732. Allogeneic Transplantation: Disease Response and Comparative Treatment Studies: Poster I
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Acute Myeloid Malignancies, AML, Biological therapies, adult, elderly, Clinical Research, health outcomes research, Diseases, real-world evidence, Therapies, young adult , Myeloid Malignancies, Study Population, Human, Transplantation, Minimal Residual Disease
Methods: This study analyzed patients of age more than 18 years who underwent alloHCT between 2018 and 2022 at single center. NGS mutation test was obtained at diagnosis, and every 3 months after stem cell transplant for 2 years with synchronized peripheral blood chimerism tests. Requirement for inclusion in this retrospective cohort study was availability of NGS mutation results at pre-transplant and at 3 months, as well as donor chimerism results after alloHCT. Patients with no mutations by NGS at diagnosis and at pre-transplant were excluded.
Patients were classified by the NGS MRD status in pre-transplant and at 3 months post-transplant: Positive MRD to Positive MRD (Group A), Positive MRD to Negative MRD (Group B), Negative MRD to Positive MRD (Group C), and Negative MRD to Negative MRD (Group D). Patient characteristics are in Table 1.
The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to estimate the survival and to compare the differences in survival. Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism version 9.1.0 (Prism Inc), Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation).
Results: Median follow-up was 21 months (range, 3-66). One hundred sixty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Among these, 104 (63.0%) were MRD positive, and 61 (37.0%) were MRD negative by NGS at pre-alloHCT. Fifty-one of the MRD positive patients (49%) became MRD negative by NGS at 3 months after alloHCT. The conversion rate to MRD negative from positive by NGS was not different by conditioning regimen (myeloablative (MA) 54.3% versus reduced intensity (RIC) 49.2%, p=0.67), or by AML risk group (intermediate 48.9% versus adverse 44.7%, p=0.84).
Four years cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) of each group was statistically different between Group A and the others (Group A 47.3%, Group B 17.7%, Group C 25.9%, and Group D 10.9%, p<0.001), but not different between Group B, C and D (p>0.5). Median OS was 17 months for Group A, 27 months for Group C, but the other groups did not reach. Four-year OS of each group was statistically different between Group A, Group B, and Group D (Group A 21.1% (95% CI: 2.0 – 53.8), Group B 55.2% (95% CI: 38.7 – 68.9), Group C 50.0% (95% CI: 20.8 – 73.6), and Group D 79.3% (95% CI: 63.7 – 94.9), respectively, p< 0.05). Among 12 patients who were MRD positive by NGS in post-alloHCT, but not in pre-alloHCT (Group C), 3 had clinical relapse, at 4 months, 6 months, and 26 months, respectively. Five patients had NGS mutations different from the initial diagnosis. They did not show clinical relapse and maintained 100% peripheral blood lymphoid (CD3) donor chimerism throughout the observation.
Conclusion: This study showed alloHCT could convert 49% of pre-transplant MRD positive patients to MRD negative by NGS. However, there were no differences in conversion rate by intensity of conditioning regimen or by AML risk group. Combining pre- and 3 months post-transplant MRD status by NGS could discriminate prognostic subgroups in post-transplant MRD positive and negative group each and may be useful in designing post-alloHCT therapies.
Disclosures: Suh: Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McKiernan: Sanofi: Speakers Bureau.