denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.
denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.
denotes that this is a ticketed session.Session: 613. Acute Myeloid Leukemias: Clinical and Epidemiological: Poster II
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Clinical Research, real-world evidence
Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the standard treatment for newly diagnosed elderly/unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) disease following Ven-HMA are limited in the absence of targetable mutations. In a recent phase 2 study, the addition of Ven to cladribine (CDA) plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), in newly-diagnosed elderly/unfit AML, resulted in complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery rate of 93% (J Clin Oncol 20;40(33)). In the current study, we share our experience with this regimen in patients relapsed or refractory to Ven-HMA, treated outside of clinical trials.
Methods
Under an institutional review board approved minimum risk protocol, the Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL) database was searched to identify patients with AML who failed treatment with Ven-HMA and subsequently received at least one cycle of salvage therapy with Ven-CDA-LDAC: Ven 100-400 mg, dose adjusted, d1-21, CDA 5 mg/m2 d1-5, LDAC 20 mg twice daily d1-10, outside of clinical trials. Cytogenetic and molecular studies were performed at the time of Ven-CDA-LDAC initiation in most cases, by conventional karyotype and next-generation sequencing, respectively. The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria were applied to define risk and response. Survival was calculated from the time of Ven-CDA-LDAC treatment start to last follow-up or death.
Results
Patient characteristics
A total of 39 RR AML patients (median age 65 years, 67% male, 64% de novo), with prior exposure to Ven-HMA, received Ven-CDA-LDAC (median 1 cycle; range 1-5). Study patients had received one (n=16), two (n=14), three (n=5), four (n=2), five (n=1) or nine (n=1) prior therapies, including Ven-HMA. Nine (23%) patients had relapsed following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). ELN cytogenetic risk included intermediate (46%, n=18), and adverse (54%, n=21). Mutations involved TP53 in 9 patients (23%), K/NRAS in 8 (21%), RUNX1 in 7 (18%), TET2 in 6 (15%), ASXL1 in 5 (13%), and STAG2 in 5 (13%).
Response and toxicity
Eleven (28%) patients achieved CR (n=2; 5%) or CRi (n=9; 23%); median time to response was 1 month and median response duration 3.4 months. In addition, 2 (5%) patients each experienced partial remission (PR) and bone marrow aplasia without fulfilling criteria for morphologic leukemia free state. Measurable residual disease (MRD) was negative by multiparametric flow cytometry in 2 of 7 (29%) informative CR/CRi cases. CR/CRi rates were higher in females (54% vs 15%; p=0.01), de novo vs secondary AML (40% vs 7%; p=0.02), and absence of adverse karyotype (50% vs 9%; p<0.01), K/NRAS (35% vs 0%, p=0.01), ASXL1 (32% vs 0%, p=0.05), or STAG2 mutations (32% vs 0%, p=0.05) (Table 1). Multivariable analysis confirmed superior response in de novo AML (p<0.01), absence of adverse karyotype, (p<0.01), and absence of K/NRAS mutations (p=0.02). CR/CRi rates were not significantly affected by relapsed vs refractory setting (p=0.95), number of prior therapies (p=0.51), prior AHSCT (p=0.64), or TP53 mutations (p=0.64) (Table 1). Treatment-emergent toxicities included infections (49%, n=19), comprising bacteremia (n=11), pneumonia (n=10), peri-rectal abscess (n=6), and laboratory evidence of tumor lysis syndrome (3%, n=1).
Survival
At a median follow-up of 3.9 months, from initiation of Ven-CDA-LDAC, 31 deaths (79%), 6 relapses (15%), and 7 AHSCT (18%; including 5 in CR/CRi, 1 in aplasia) were documented. Median survival following Ven-CDA-LDAC was 4.6 months, and superior in the presence vs absence of CR/CRi (8.1 vs 2.9 months; p=0.01), and in patients receiving AHSCT (10.5 vs 3.4 months; p=0.02). Absence of adverse karyotype was also associated with superior survival (6 vs 3.4 months; p=0.05). Multivariable analysis confirmed the favorable survival impact of CR/CRi (p=0.03) and AHSCT (p=0.05); survival impact was not apparent for secondary AML (p=0.29) or K/NRAS (p=0.70) or TP53 (p=0.10) mutations.
Conclusions
The current study suggests transplant bridging value for Ven-CDA-LDAC in AML patients relapsed or refractory to Ven-HMA, especially in the absence of adverse karyotype or K/NRAS mutation. AHSCT and achievement of CR/CRi appear to be indispensable for favorable post-Ven-CDA-LDAC survival.
Disclosures: Alkhateeb: Mayo Clinic: Current Employment. Begna: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immunogen: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding. Shah: Astellas: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; MRKR Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Murthy: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Senti Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CRISPR Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bavarian Nordic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Foran: CTI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Sellas: Research Funding; Roivant: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding.
OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax + Cladribine + Low-Dose Cytarabine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Relapsed or Refractory to Venetoclax + Hypomethylating Agent
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts