Michela Rondoni1*, Paola Minetto, MD2, Bruna Puglisi3*, Francesco Saraceni3*, Lorenzo Brunetti, MD4*, Anna Maria Mianulli, MD5*, Monica Bocchia, MD6*, Adele Santoni, MD6*, Carola Riva7*, Barbara Giannini8*, Federica Monaco9*, Beatrice Zannetti9*, Claudia Cellini, MD, PhD10*, Annalisa Nicoletti8*, Anna Maria Valenti8*, Debora Capelli, MD11*, Donatella Raspadori, PhD12*, Attilio Olivieri13*, Francesco Lanza, MD14*, Claudio Graziano8*, Patrizia Tosi, MD5*, Roberto Massimo Lemoli, MD15,16* and Fabio Guolo, MD, PhD16,17*
1Hematology Unit & Metropolitan Transplant Network, Ravenna, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, ITA
2Clinica Ematologica, Dipartimento di Oncologia e Ematologia, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
3Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Ancona, Italy
4Clinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
5Hematology Unit, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy
6UOC Ematologia, Azienda ospedaliero-universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
7Clinic of hematology, Department of Internal medicine(DiMI), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
8Genetica Medica, Centro Servizi Laboratorio Unico Area Vasta Romagna, Pievesestina di Cesena, Cesena, Italy
9Hematology Unit & Metropolitan Transplant Network, Ravenna and Stem Cell Transplant, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
10AUSL Romagna, U.O.C. Ematologia, Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy
11Clinica di Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, ITA
12Department of Medical Science, Surgery and Neuroscience, Hematology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
13Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
14Hematology Unit and Metropolitan Romagna Transplant Network, University of Bologna, Ravenna, Italy
15Clinic of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine (DiMI), University of Genoa, Italy, Genoa, Italy
16Clinic of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine (DiMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
17IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
In a randomized Phase III trial, CPX-351has shown to be more effective than conventional 3+7 chemotherapy as frontline treatment for secondary or therapy-related AML. However, longer time for haematologic recovery (HR) after induction cycle (IC) was observed among CPX-351 treated patients. Later real-world evidences confirmed this observation, noting in addition that the time to HR was quite variable among different patients, as some patients showed quick recovery whereas others showed very delayed HR. However, despite the high clinical relevance, no specific factors related to a longer time to HR have been identified in CPX-351 treated patients so far.The aim of this study was to identify patients-related factors related to delayed HR and the outcome of patients showing a late HR. Data from 130patientswith newly diagnosed AML who received 1 or 2 cycles of CPX-351 were retrospectively collected. All patients received the EMA–approved dosing and schedule of CPX-351. Median age was 66 years (32-78). MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities(CA) were found in 68 patients (52%), whereas MDS-related genetic abnormalities in absence of CA were found in 30 patients (23%). 32 patients had t-AML (24%) and 61 (47%) had a previous diagnosis of MDS. The CR+CRi rate after induction cycle was 67%. 89/130 pts received a second course of CPX-351 after IC, with CR+CRi rate of 71% after the second induction course. Among 92 pts who achieved CR/Cri, 88 were evaluable for flow cytometry-based MRD and among them 62 (71%) had reached negativity. Forty-two patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first CR (32%, 46% of responding patients), with a median time to transplant of 213 days (range 52-638). Nine more patients received ASCT in second CR. After a median follow-up of 23 months (IC 95% 14.4 – 36.7), the median OS was 21 months (95% CI 17.5-25.7). In responding patients, median time to neutrophils (PMN) >0.5×109/L and platelet (PLT)>20×109/L recovery was 32 (14-54) and 31 (10-94) days, respectively. Seven patients never achieved PMN or PLT recovery even if in CRi. A total of 23 patients (18%) showed a late HR, defined as a time to PMN >500 recovery > 35 days and/or PLT>20.000 > 40 days).
Only a low bone marrow cellularity at diagnosis correlated with late HR (p<0.05), whereas no correlation between late HR and baseline patient’s characteristics (sex, age), disease characteristics at diagnosis (cytogenetic risk, AML subtypes, diagnostic qualifiers, molecular profiles) or adverse events (bleeding, FUO, sepsis) was disclosed. Most patients with late HR showed no CA (68%), 26% of patients showed int risk CA, and only two patients (9%) had high risk CA. Interestingly, patients with late HR showed very high MRD negativity rate (19/22, 86%) and, while time to allo-HSCT was significantly longer, OS was not different from what observed in patients achieving CR without late HR.
In conclusions, CPX-treated patients who show a late HR are likely to be affected by AML progressing form MDS with low cellularity, having less adverse cytogenetic risk (hypoplastic/aplastic MDS). Those patients, despite the long time to HR, usually show a good response to CPX and an outcome superimposable with responding patients with normal time to HR time.