BCMA CAR-T-Cell Therapy in Combination with Long-Term Pomalidomide Is a Safe and Effective Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Background: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T-cell) therapy has exhibited remarkable efficacy in refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (R/R MM), but recurrence and rapid progression of disease are still observed in some cases within a short time after treatment. Long-term pomalidomide therapy, which potentiates T-cell functionality and has direct antimyeloma effects, might enhance the efficacy of BCMA CAR-T-cell therapy. Here, we present the efficacy of this combination regimen for R/R MM.

Methods: We performed a single-center prospective clinical study that was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR2000036350). Patients with relpased or refractory multiple myeloma receiving BCMA CAR-T cell infusion were randomized to receive long-term pomalidomide treatment (4 mg/day) one month after infusion. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) in R/R MM with long-term pomalidomide administration compared to those without pomalidomide therapy after CAR T-cell infusion. The secondary endpoints include time to progression (TTP) and therapeutic response. Also, the copy numbers of CAR were assessed after infusion.

Results: A total of 14 R/R MM patients who received BCMA CAT T-cell therapy, were included in this study. The median age of the enrolled R/R MM patients was 59.5 years (44-71). Five patients had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (IGH rearrangement, 1q21 amplification, and P53 deletion) at the time of initial diagnosis. In addition, high-risk genetic alterations were newly detected in patient 2 during first-line therapy. All patients had previously received 3 to 6 lines of treatment with proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), or anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. As shown in Figure 1, all patients had demonstrated progressive disease prior to CAR T-cell infusion. The objective response rate (ORR) of BCMA-CART was 100%. Three months following CAR-T-cell infusion, of the 6 patients receiving pomalidomide, all patients (6/6) achieved VGPR (very good partial response) or CR (complete response）, while only 5 patients (5/8) who did not receive pomalidomide treatment achieved VGPR or better. At a median follow-up of 19.7 months, for the 8 patients who did not receive pomalidomide administration, the median TTP (time to progression) was 4.5 (1-14) months, while the TTP was not reached in patients who received long-term pomalidomide treatment.

Moreover, the dynamic abundance of circulating BCMA CAR-T cells was monitored as shown in Figure 2. In patients who received pomalidomide treatment after CAR-T-cell therapy, the CAR copy numbers of circulating CAR-T cells peaked 8 to 10 days after CAR-T-cell infusion, with a peak copy number of up to 10⁶. In addition, BCMA CAR-T cells persisted (>1*10³ copies/µg DNA) for 3 months in vivo. Without pomalidomide administration, BCMA CAR-T cells persisted for up to 2.5 months in the peripheral circulation (results not shown).

Conclusion: Our results confirm the efficacy of the long-term oral pomalidomide administration (4 mg/day) after BCMA CAR T-cell infusion in patients with R/R MM. Notably, this combination regieme reduced the recurrence rate and prolonged progression-free survival for R/R MM patients, providing a promising option for treating R/R MM. In addition, oral administration of pomalidomide did not significantly prolong the persistence of BCMA CAR T-cells in vivo. However, data from studies with larger sample sizes are required to draw valid conclusions.