-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

137 Real-World Analysis of Thromboembolic Event Rates in Patients in the United States with Polycythemia Vera

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Type: Oral
Session: 904. Outcomes Research – Non-Malignant Conditions: Across the Age Spectrum: Thromboembolism Outcomes in Adult and Pediatric Patients
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, adult, Clinical Research, Diseases, real-world evidence, Study Population, Human
Saturday, December 9, 2023: 10:30 AM

Andrew T. Kuykendall, MD1, Abdulraheem Yacoub, MD2, Nancy Reaven3*, Susan Funk3*, Pedro Oyuela, MD4*, Frank Valone, MD4*, Phil Dinh4*, Lucy Bellamy4*, Nikita Modi, PharmD4*, Arturo Molina, MD, MS, FACP4 and Suneel Gupta, PhD4

1Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
2The University of Kansas, Westwood, KS
3Strategic Health Resources, La Canada, CA
4Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, CA

Background: Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events (TEs). PV patients are characterized based on their risk for TEs as low-risk (age <60 without prior history of TE) or high-risk (age ≥60 and/or prior history of TE). Observational studies have shown higher rates of TEs in PV patients compared to matched controls (14.3 vs 4.9/1000 patient years, or PY), with rates as high as 40% in patients with PV (Goyal et al., Blood. 2014;124:4840; Griesshammer et al., Ann Hematol. 2019;98:1071-82; Pemmaraju et al., Leuk Res. 2022;115:106809). We assessed the rate of arterial and venous TEs in a large cohort of low- and high-risk PV patients.

Methods: We conducted a real-world, retrospective cohort study using Optum’s de-identified Market Clarity Data, which includes electronic health records (EHR) on 105 million US patients between 2007-2019. Eligible patients were ≥18 years [yrs] old and required ≥2 PV diagnosis codes with ≥60 days between the first and last diagnosis code in the data period. Patients were indexed at the first diagnosis code of PV preceded by ≥1 year of EHR data (“index”) and required ≥1 year of post-index data or death prior to data period end (12/31/2019). Patients with a pre-index diagnosis of secondary polycythemia, leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, myelofibrosis, or stem cell transplant were excluded. Patients were stratified into three groups based on risk status at index: low-risk (age <60 without prior history of TE), age-based high-risk (age >60 without prior history of TE) and event-based high-risk (prior history of TE). As outcomes, TEs were identified at the first occurrence of a diagnosis code for a TE in EHR during the post-index period. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the proportion of patients with TEs and event rates per 1000 PY. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the probability of TE-free survival among patients in the three risk groups at various time points. Patients were censored at death or last engagement date.

Results: The total study cohort included 20,089 PV patients (mean age, 63.0 yrs; 57.8% male; 88.6% Caucasian). Approximately one-third (34.4%; 6909 patients) were low-risk, 49.4% (9924 patients) were age-based high-risk, and 16.2% (3256 patients) were event-based high-risk. Among 17,402 patients with pre-index medication data, 16.0% (n=2777) received hydroxyurea (HU) pre-index. HU usage was highest in age-based high-risk patients (21.8%) followed by event-based high-risk (20.0%) and low-risk patients (5.8%). Median follow-up period was 4.3 yrs (IQR, 2.4-5.9). Incidence of TEs was assessed within patient groups (Table 1). Overall, 25.1% (5035/20,089) of patients with PV experienced at least one TE during the post-index period. Incidence of TEs was highest among event-based high-risk patients (50.2%; 1634/3256), followed by age-based high-risk (25.0%; 2480/9924) and low-risk patients (13.3%; 921/6909). The rate of post-index TEs was more than triple for event-based high-risk patients vs. age-based high-risk patients (206 vs. 68/1000 PY) and nearly 7 times higher vs. low-risk patients (206 vs. 31/1000 PY). The rate of TEs was more than double for age-based high-risk patients vs. low-risk patients (68 vs. 31/1000 PY). Incidence of arterial and venous TEs was assessed across the total cohort (Table 1). The most common arterial events were stroke (7.1%) and MI/ACS (6.4%). The most common venous events were DVT/deep thrombophlebitis (8.1%) and pulmonary embolism (4.5%). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that at ≈2.5 yrs (1000 days) post-index, TE-free survival was ≈90% for low-risk, ≈80% for age-based high-risk, and ≈55% for event-based high-risk patients (Figure 1). At ≈5.5 yrs (2000 days) post-index, TE-free survival had fallen to ≈85% for low-risk, ≈70% for age-based high-risk, and ≈40% for event-based high-risk patients. The downward trend continued until the end of the data period.

Conclusion: Findings from this real-world analysis indicate that PV patients experience high rates of arterial and venous TEs. Event-based high-risk patients have a substantially lower probability of TE-free survival compared with age-based high-risk and low-risk patients. While patients with a prior history of TE have the highest thromboembolic risk, all patients with PV are at high risk of TE, indicating an unmet need for reduction of thromboembolic risks.

Disclosures: Kuykendall: CTI: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Imago: Consultancy; Prelude: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Morphosys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Blueprint: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy. Yacoub: Acceleron Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Pharmaessentia: Consultancy; CTI Pharma: Consultancy; Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Notable Labs: Consultancy; AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy; AbbVie, Acceleron, Apellis, CTI Pharma, Gilead, Incyte, Notable Labs, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaEssentia, Servier.: Consultancy. Reaven: Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Funk: Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Oyuela: Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Valone: Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Dinh: Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bellamy: Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Modi: Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Molina: Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gupta: Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

*signifies non-member of ASH