Session: 621. Lymphomas: Translational—Molecular and Genetic: Poster III
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Translational Research
Methods. SWOG S0016 was a phase III randomized study that compared the safety and efficacy of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) with CHOP-RIT (CHOP + I133-tositumomab) in patients with FL. Between 2001 and 2008, 531 patients with previously untreated advanced-stage FL (bulky stage II, III-IV) of any pathologic grade were randomly assigned to receive 6 cycles of R-CHOP or CHOP-RIT. We used high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of the IGH and IGK/L loci (ClonoSeq assay) from tumor biopsy specimens taken prior to treatment to define CDR3 rearrangements that tag the tumor. Subsequently, 1-year bone marrow specimens were screened for residual disease. The baseline dominant clone was defined as ≥10 estimated number of genomes (ENG) and comprised ≥5% of the library. MRD-positive state (MRDp) was defined as a minimum Hamming distance (HD) ≤6 in a patient’s post-library (in any clone also detected in a pre-library) and conserved pre-existing SHM (if HD>0). Undetectable MRD (MRDu, at <10-4) was defined as CRD3 HD>6 in a post-library with a depth >10,000 ENG. Five-year progression-free survival was the primary endpoint (PFS; defined as the time from registration to the first observation of progression or death due to any cause). Landmark analysis was defined at 1 year after registration and used for imputing the 5-year PFS and OS. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from registration to date of death due to any cause or last follow-up. PFS and OS estimates and 95% confidence interval were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared for MRDp and MRDu disease using two-sided log-rank test. HR and 95% CI were calculated using Cox regression model.
Results. Tumor biopsy tissue was available for 189 patients. Of these, 24 patients were not evaluable (16 did not consent for banking, 6 were ineligible and 4 had an early event). In 36 patients, pre-libraries did not yield a trackable clone. In total, MRD status could not be ascertained in 47 patients due to absence of a clear trackable clone in either pre- or post-library, contributing to a 28.8% failure rate. Of 116 patients which yielded a trackable clone in both libraries, 83 were MRDu and 33 were MRDp. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, race, β2M, B symptoms, bulky disease, grade 3, stage, and FLIPI risk) were similar between MRDp and MRDu patients; however, MRDp patients were more likely to exhibit morphologic baseline bone marrow involvement by FL (82% vs. 55%, p=0.01). The estimated 5-year PFS was 72% in MRDu patients and 30% in MRD+ patients (Figure); 10-year PFS was 56% and 17%, correspondingly. Meanwhile, 5-year OS was not different (96% for MRDu, 81% for MRD+, p=0.91). Patients with MRDu had a significantly higher best overall response rate than MRDp patients (96% vs 79%, p=0.005), but complete response (CR) rates were similar (41% vs. 30.3%). Patients who received CHOP-RIT had better PFS regardless of MRD status (HR=0.48, p=0.01 for MRDu; HR=0.38, p=0.02 for MRDp), while OS was not statistically different. Five-year PFS was superior in patients who achieved MRDu (75% for CR and 70% for PR) compared with MRDp patients, regardless of response (34%). Patients who had MRDp status had a significantly increased risk of experiencing POD24 relative to MRDu patients (RR=6.5, 95% CI 3.0-14.0; p<0.0001).
Conclusion. Here we for the first time demonstrate that MRDu status, as assessed by Clonoseq, predicts improved 5- and 10-year PFS in patients with FL initially treated with chemoimmunotherapy. MRD+ status in the bone marrow at a 1-year timepoint was associated with POD24. Despite a relatively high failure rate to detect trackable sequences using current technology (~29%), MRD assessment by NGS is a promising prognostic tool in FL.
Disclosures: Danilov: Bayer: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Cyclacel: Research Funding; MEI: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nurix: Consultancy, Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Lilly Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding. Shadman: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC therapeutics: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; Vincerx: Research Funding; MorphoSys/Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Regeneron: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mustang Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Rimsza: Roche: Other: Consulting; NanoString: Other: Licensed intellectual property. Smith: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Ono Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Carlson: Adaptive: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts