-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

3058 Development and Validation of the Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) International Prognostication Index (E-HIPI): A Report from the Hodgkin Lymphoma International Study for Individual Care (HoLISTIC) Consortium

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 624. Hodgkin Lymphomas and T/NK cell Lymphomas: Clinical and Epidemiological: Poster II
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Research, Hodgkin lymphoma, adult, epidemiology, Clinical Practice (Health Services and Quality), Lymphomas, Clinical Research, Diseases, real-world evidence, registries, Lymphoid Malignancies, young adult , survivorship, Study Population, Human
Sunday, December 10, 2023, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM

Andrew M Evens, DO, MBA, MMSc1, Angie Mae Rodday, PhD, MS2, Matthew J. Maurer, DSc3, Ranjana H. Advani, MD4, Marc Andre, MD, PhD5*, Andrea Gallamini, MD6*, Annette E. Hay, MD, FRCPath, FRCPC7, David Hodgson, MD8*, Richard T. Hoppe, MD9, Martin Hutchings, MD, PhD10*, Peter Johnson, MD, FRCP11*, Brian K. Link, MD12*, Stephen Opat, FRACP, FRCPA, MBBS13*, John M. Raemaekers, MD, PhD14*, Jenica Upshaw, MD15*, Qingyan Xiang, MS16*, Nicholas Counsell17*, Susan K Parsons, MD, MRCP18 and John Radford, MD19*

1Division of Blood Disorders, Rutgers Cancer Institute New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
2Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
3Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
4Division of Oncology, Stanford University Institute, Stanford, CA
5CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
6Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Centre, Nice, Paca, ITA
7Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
8Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, CAN
9Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
10Department of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
11Southampton General Hospital School of Medicine, Southampton, United Kingdom
12Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood & Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA
13School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, and Haematology Department, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
14Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, NLD
15Cardio-Oncology Program, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
16Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
17Principal Statistician - Cancer Trials, CRUK Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, GBR
18The Center for Health Solutions, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
19Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, ENG, United Kingdom

Background: There are a lack of clinical prediction tools in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (E-HL). We developed and validated a modern-day model, known as E-HIPI, to predict progression-free survival (PFS) within the first 5 years (y) incorporating detailed individual patient (pt) data from international clinical trials and prospective registry data that were standardized, normalized & harmonized as part of the HoLISTIC Consortium (www.hodgkinconsortium.org).

Methods: Model development utilized Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines (Moons, Ann Intern Med 2015) on a cohort of 3,080 newly-diagnosed E-HL pts treated on 4 seminal phase 3 clinical trials (NCIC: Meyer, NEJM 2012; RAPID: Radford, NEJM 2015; EORTC-GELA H9U: Ferme, Eur J Cancer 2017; EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10: Andre, JCO 2017). External validation was done in an independent cohort of 462 E-HL pts from a large registry (Princess Margaret, Toronto). Pts with classic HL, stage I or II disease, and ages 18-65 y were included. The primary outcome was PFS. Cox models were utilized with follow-up truncated at 5 years. Baseline predictors were: sex, stage, B symptoms, histology, number & location of nodal sites, and continuous data values of age, maximum tumor diameter (MTD), white blood cell count (WBC), lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, albumin & erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Multiple imputation was used for missing data. To consider possible non-linear relationships for continuous variables, we examined plots & cubic splines. We used backward elimination (P<0.1) to develop the models & internal validation with 200 bootstrap samples was conducted to estimate optimism & correct for overfitting. The final prediction equations applied optimism corrections to beta coefficients & hazard ratios (HR). Sensitivity analyses included model results stratified by PET staging (vs CT) and each HL trial. The models were evaluated in the external validation cohort & compared using c-statistics. Model scores were also grouped by tertiles for visualization in Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves.

Results: Median age in the development cohort was 35y; 51% were female; 81% had nodular sclerosis & 77% stage II disease; 26% had B symptoms; 32% had mediastinal bulk (≥10cm or >1/3 diameter) and the mean MTD was 6.4 cm (interquartile range (IQR), 3.9-8.2). Median follow-up was 60 months (IQR 45-75). KM estimates at 5y was 90.7% (264 events) for PFS, and 97.1% (78 events) for overall survival (OS). After backward elimination, significant variables retained were age, sex, nodal location (cervical region), MTD & albumin. Stage, ESR, or the number of nodal sites were not significant. Age was modeled with piecewise linear splines due to its non-linear relationship. See the Table for the final prediction model and optimism-corrected HRs. Optimism-corrected c-statistics in the development model was 0.63. Sensitivity analyses of stratification by type of imaging at staging or by each clinical trial demonstrated no change in model parameters or c-statistics. Most baseline characteristics and outcomes of the external validation cohort were similar besides median follow-up time (74 months, IQR 37-129). C-statistics for the E-HIPI model in external validation was 0.63. In addition, observed 5y outcomes stratified by tertile of predicted risk in the external cohort separated pts into a low & higher-risk group, which comprised 1/3 & 2/3 of pts, respectively (Figure). Finally, model diagnostics revealed the potential for time dependency in the retained covariates. Further assessment of differential prediction between early (<2y) vs. later (2-5y) PFS events is ongoing.

Conclusion: Following TRIPOD methodology, we rigorously developed and externally validated the E-HIPI among >3,500 E-HL pts. Discrete risk groups were delineated, and we identified several novel factors, including nodal location, sex & key continuous variables that predict 5y PFS. Additional model refinement is underway, including formal calibration & external validation via other HL registries (Stanford, Mayo/Iowa SPORE). A web-based calculator to simplify application of the E-HIPI will also be presented at ASH. Future planned modeling includes integration of differing treatments & response-adapted imaging via multistate modeling to enrich individualized survival estimates and simulation modeling to predict late consequences.

Disclosures: Evens: Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Maurer: BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; GenMab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding. Advani: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADCT: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cyteir: Research Funding; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Seagen: Research Funding. Hay: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Hutchings: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Parsons: Seagen: Consultancy. Radford: GlaxoSmithKline: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; AstraZeneca: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; Takeda: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics, Takeda, Sobi: Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics, Takeda: Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics, Takeda, Sobi: Consultancy.

*signifies non-member of ASH