-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1799 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in African Ancestry Population Is Characterized By Increased Telomere Erosion

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 642. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Clinical and Epidemiological: Poster I
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Lymphoid Leukemias, CLL, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) , Diseases, Lymphoid Malignancies, Technology and Procedures, molecular testing
Saturday, December 10, 2022, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM

Cecilia Bonolo De Campos, PhD1*, Chantal McCabe, Ph.D.2*, Laura Ann Bruins, BS3*, Daniel R. O'Brien4*, Sochilt Brown5*, Cristine Allmer6*, Yuan Xiao Zhu, Ph.D.1*, Kari G Rabe, MS7*, Sameer A. Parikh, MD8, Neil E. Kay, MD8,9, James R. Cerhan, MD, PhD10, Laura Z Rassenti, PhD11*, Richard R. Furman, MD12, J. Brice Weinberg, MD13, Danielle Brander, MD14, Marta Chesi, PhD5, Susan L. Slager, PhD4,15 and Esteban Braggio, PhD16

1Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
2Division of Computational Biology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
3Division of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ
4Division of Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
5Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
6Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
7Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
8Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
9Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
10Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
11Center for Novel Therapeutics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA
12Division of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
13Division of Hematology, VA & Duke Medical Centers, Durham, NC
14Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
15Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
16Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ

Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a neoplastic disease of relatively mature B-cells, is characterized by a variable clinical course. Although initial studies suggesting more aggressive disease phenotype and inferior clinical outcomes among CLL patients of African ancestry (AA) were published a decade ago, biological features contributing towards this augmented disease severity remain largely unknown. Telomere erosion in a cohort of CLL patients of European Ancestry (EA) has been previously associated with high-risk molecular markers including unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region (u-IGHV) status, and genetic alterations such as del(17p) and del(11q) by FISH. Here we characterized telomere erosion in AA CLL patients compared to CLL patients of EA.

Methods: We extracted DNA from CD5+/CD19+ cells peripheral blood mononuclear cells and utilized it to measure the average telomere length through quantitative-PCR (qPCR). Briefly, primers for telomere and the single copy gene (SCG) HBB were used for amplification of 20 ng of DNA in a total volume of 20 µL in triplicates using the KAPA SYBR® FAST optimized for LightCycler®480 and analyzed on a LightCycler®480. Absolute telomere lengths were then obtained by generating standard curves using synthetic oligonucleotide PCR standards for telomere and the SCG gene. The qPCR results were validated by terminal restriction fragment length (TRF) analysis and Southern hybridization (N=28; r=0.8531; p<0.0001) using the TeloTTAGGG Telomere Length Assay. TRF was used as the gold standard of telomere length quantification; however, the high quantity of genomic DNA required for the assay (2µg) limited its broad use. Five CLL samples with known telomere lengths through TRF analysis were included in every qPCR plate in order to perform a linear regression to account for variability between qPCR plates as described previously.

Results: Telomere erosion was evaluated in a cohort of 133 AA (mean age at sample collection 62.7 years ±13.6) and 147 age-matched EA CLL patients (mean age at sample collection 61.6 years ±10.2). The AA samples were collected from 95 (71%) male patients and 71% presented u-IGHV, while EA samples were collected from 110 (77%) male patients and 66% u-IGHV. As expected, we observed shorter telomere length in u-IGHV CLL (median 3.7 kb; range 0.8-44.9) compared to mutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region (m-IGHV) CLL (median 6.8 kb; range 1.8-44.7; p<0.0001) in the full cohort. AA CLL presented shorter telomere lengths (median 4.2 kb; range 0.6-13.1) when compared to EA CLL (median 4.7 kb; range 1.1-44.9; p=0.005; Figure 1A). We highlight that the differences in telomere length observed were restricted to the CD5+/CD19+ cells, with no difference observed in germline samples collected from AA and EA patients. When stratifying by IGHV mutation status, shorter telomere length was observed in u-IGHV when compared to m-IGHV among both AA CLL (median 3.5 kb and 6.3, respectively; p<0.0001) and EA CLL (median 3.9 kb and 7.5, respectively; p<0.0001; Figure 1B). The significant shorter telomere lengths in AA CLL remained significant (p=0.006) after accounting for IGHV status, age, sex, number of mutated CLL driver genes, and Rai stage in multivariate analyses.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrated increased telomere erosion in AA CLL compared to EA CLL, even after accounting for other known prognostic factors. Telomere length has been described as an independent prognostic factor in multiple cancers. In CLL, telomere shortening can lead to a selective pressure for loss of function of DNA damage checkpoint genes, becoming permissive to further cell proliferation and telomere shortening. Future studies are needed to see if these findings contribute towards the severe clinical outcomes in AA CLL compared to EA CLL.

Disclosures: Parikh: Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Phamacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotehcnologies: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Genetech: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Kay: MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Committee, Research Funding; Rigel: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Committee; Morpho-sys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Committee; Dren Bio: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Committee; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Data Safety Monitoring Committee; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx Therapy: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Data Safety Monitoring Committee; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Data Safety Monitoring Committee; Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Targeted Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Committee, Research Funding. Cerhan: NanoString: Research Funding; GenMab: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Protagonist: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Furman: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Genentech, Janssen, Loxo, MEI Pharma, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, TG Therapeutics, X4 Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Brander: TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Ascentage (transitioning): Research Funding; AstraZeneca/Acerta: Research Funding; NeWave: Research Funding; ArQule/Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; Juno/Celgene/BMS: Research Funding; CATO/SMS Catapult: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Chesi: Abcuro, Palleon Pharmaceuticals,, Pi Therapeutics.: Patents & Royalties: Genetically engineered mouse model of myeloma.; Pfizer, Novartis.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

*signifies non-member of ASH