-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1997 A Phase II Randomized Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Infusion of Memory T Cells As Adoptive Therapy in Coronavirus Pneumonia and/or Lymphopenia (RELEASE NCT04578210)

Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 704. Cellular Immunotherapies: Early Phase and Investigational Therapies: Poster I
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
Biological therapies, Diseases, SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19, Infectious Diseases, Therapies, Immunotherapy, Infusion
Saturday, December 10, 2022, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM

Antonio Perez, MD, PhD1,2*, Cristina Ferreras, PhD3*, Clara Hernandez, MD4*, Alejandro Martín-Quirós5*, Karima Al-Akioui6*, Marta Mora-Rillo7*, Fátima Ibáñez, MD8*, Rosa Goterris, MD, PhD9*, Raquel De Paz Arias, PhD10*, Pilar Guerra-García11*, Javier Queiruga-Parada12*, Pablo Molina13*, Merche Bou14*, Carmen Mestre-Durán6*, Alberto Borobia6,12*, Antonio J Carcas12,15*, María Luisa Briones16*, Jose Luis Vicario, PhD17*, Miguel Ángel Moreno17*, Antonio Balas, PhD17*, Cristina Eguizábal, PhD18,19*, Bernat Soria, PhD20,21* and Carlos Solano, MD, PhD22,23,24

1Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain
2Hemato-Oncology Pediatric Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
3Translational Research In Pediatric Oncology, Hematopoietic Transplantation and, Madrid, ESP
4Internal Medicine, Hospital Enfermera Isabel Zendal, Madrid, Spain
5Emergency Unit, Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain
6Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain
7Diseases Unit, Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain., Madrid, Spain
8Internal Medicine, Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
9Hematology, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
10Hematology, Hospital Universitario La Paz-Idipaz, Madrid, ESP
11Pediatric Hemato-Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain., Madrid, Spain
12Clinical Pharmacology Department University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain., Madrid, Spain
13Clinical Pharmacology Department, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
14Clinical Trial Unit, Hospital Clínico, Valencia, Spain, Valencia, Spain
15Faculty of Medicine Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain
16Neumology Department, Hospital Clínico, Valencia, Spain, Valencia, Spain
17Histocompatibility, Centro de Transfusión de la Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain
18Research Unit, Basque Centre for Blood Transfusion and Human Tissues, Osakidetza, Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain, Galdakao, Spain
19Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Barakaldo, Spain
20University Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain, Sevilla, Spain
21Health Research Institute-ISABIAL, Alicante University Hospital and Institute of Bioengineering, Miguel Hernández University., Alicante, Spain
22Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
23Department of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
24Hematology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

BACKGROUND

There are currently no specific anti-viral treatments for COVID-19 patients. Nonspecific treatments such as dexamethasone had become the standard of care (SoC) for hospitalized patients. SARS-CoV-2 induced lymphopenia is a biomarker of disease severity usually presented in hospitalized patients. We have previously demonstrated in phase 1 clinical trial that infusion of CD45RA- memory T cells from a convalescent donor containing SARS-COV-2 specific T cells is safe and feasible. Now we have performed a phase 2 randomized multicenter clinical trial where we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the infusion of memory T cells vs the SoC treatment. We hypothesize that the pool of memory T cells will increase in these patients and the restoration of total lymphocytes will help to clear the infection.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled from January 2021 to January 2022 in Spain, at University Hospital La Paz and Hospital de Emergencias Enfermera Isabel Zendal in Madrid and Hospital Clínic in Valencia. Eighty-six patients were randomized into SoC arm and SoC plus the infusion of 1x106/kg memory T cells containing SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells from convalescent donors. Analysis was completed with 81 patients (Figure 1). Eligible donors were chosen based on the expression of SARS-CoV-2 specific response within the CD45RA- memory T cells and frequency of HLA epitopes in the Spanish population. Cells from 4 unvaccinated donors were biobanked. Primary outcome was defined as proportion of participants in each group with normalization of fever and oxygen saturation and lymphopenia recovery through day 14. Secondary outcomes were 1) time to normal level of lymphocytes, 2) patients showing clinical improvement at day 7 according to the investigator, 3) patients receiving a second cycle, 4) days to first negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR after infusing memory T cells, 5) incidence of treatment-related adverse events, 6) days of hospitalization, 7) days to discharge or to a NEWS of ≤ 2 and maintained for 24 hours, 8) Time to improvement by one category on a 7-point ordinal scale, 9) subject clinical status (on a 7-point ordinal scale) at day 14, 10) patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU), 11) all-cause mortality at day 28. Exploratory outcomes were defined as donor chimerism and immune lymphocyte reconstitution.

RESULTS

Of the analyzed participants median age was 58.5 (50-65.25) years in the SoC group and 56 (50-65) in the infusion arm (p=0.643). 72.83% of patients were men, and 27.16% women (p=0.221). No statistically differences were found at baseline between the two groups including body mass index, vaccination status at the time of enrollment, comorbidities and concomitant treatments. Median time from symptom onset to randomization was 9 (7-10.25) days, and from randomization to discharge was 9 (6-16) days. Two patients died in SoC group and none in the experimental arm (p= 0.19) on day 28. Total mortality accounted for 4 deaths in the SoC arm and 1 in the experimental arm (p=0.17).

Primary outcome met the pre-specified requirements for efficacy. 74.1% of patients in the infused arm and 40% in SoC arm showed recovery according to the protocol (p=0.01). Also, 87.1% of patients in the infusion arm presented lymphocyte recovery on day 14 (p=0.02).

The percentage of patients showing lymphocyte recovery on days 3 and 14 was higher in the experimental arm (p= 0.04). No statistically significant differences were found in the other secondary outcomes or pro inflammatory parameters at enrollment or during time.

The proportion of patients showing total lymphocyte recovery was higher in the experimental arm on days 3 and 14 (p=0.004, p=0.048). Also on day 7, the same group showed an increase in NK cells (p=0.04). In T cell subsets we observed a mean of the percentage of CD8RA+ cytotoxic T cells on day 7 of 50 (42-59) in the infused arm and 37 (20-46) in the SoC (p<0.0001). Donor microchimerism was observed for 3-4 weeks after infusion. There were no treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge this is the first clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the infusion of CD45RA- memory T cells containing a pool of SARS-COV-2 specific T cells from convalescent donors in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Our results met the established primary outcome for patient recovery. Further outcome improvements can be achieved by optimizing the therapy and selecting the best donors based on current vaccination and infections.

Disclosures: Soria: Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.

*signifies non-member of ASH