Session: 703. Adoptive Immunotherapy: Poster III
Hematology Disease Topics & Pathways:
AML, Biological, Diseases, Therapies, gene therapy, Myeloid Malignancies
Here, we test this hypothesis and develop a platform to identify TCR clones against FLT3-ITD neoantigens. We selected ten FLT3-ITD sequences found in patients with AML. Using Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource, T cell epitope prediction and T cell epitopes-MHC binding prediction tools we generated peptides with high affinity to the top three common HLA alleles. FLT3-ITD (N=21) and FLT3-WT (N=5) peptides were synthesized. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from healthy donors (N=7) were pulsed with the peptides pool in the presence of IL-2 and IL-7 cytokines and cultured for one week. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry to assess changes in T cell populations. Two of the samples were magnetically enriched for CD3 positive cells (T cells) and then further sorted into the following T cell populations: CD8+, CD4+ and CD4+ CD25+. RNA was extracted from the collected cells, and 5’Race RNA based NGS was performed for TCRA and TCRB repertoire. Sequence reads were analyzed using MiXCR and “tcR” software. We compared the TCRB diversity and the V and J segment utilization difference between cells pulsed with FLT3-ITD and FLT3-WT peptides; using the Inverse Simpson index (IS) and Jensen Shannon Divergence index (JSD), respectively. We also compared the TCRA and TCRB clonal expansion between FLT3-WT and FLT3-ITD peptide stimulated cells.
The average number of different TCRB clones we identified was 32320 ±12789. The majority of V and J segment utilization JSD between FLT3-ITD and FLT3-WT values were less than 0.001; only two samples exhibited a v segment utilization JSD higher than 0.01. Among the five samples, two exhibited 50% decreased TCR diversity in the FLT3-ITD stimulated cells compared with FLT3-WT; and one sample showed 2.5 fold increase following stimulation with the –ITD peptides compared with the –WT. We also identified seven CDR3 clones that were present in FLT3-ITD peptide stimulated but not FLT3-WT stimulated T-cells from three healthy PBMC samples. The seven CDR3s in conjunction with the peptide sequences modeled from the sequence-based prediction program were then computationally docked in the MHC/TCR complex using EXSAN anchor-and-grow process. Some peptides were found to be non-binders to all TCR clones, but others were predicted to be a binder to at least one TCR and non-binders for other TCRs indicating the influence of the CDR3 region. The FLT3-ITD peptide sequences, RENLDNEYFYV, was able to bind to one CDR3 sequence, but failed to bind to other CDR3 sequences. These data suggest that the presence of the CDR3 in the model significantly influences the peptide binding.
In conclusion, we have established an MHC-peptide-TCR prediction strategy. With further optimization and validation this approach should enable the identification of neoantigens and GvL responsible TCR clones for future development of novel immunotherapy.
Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.