Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 634. Myeloproliferative Syndromes: Clinical: Phase III and Long-Term Outcome Studies in MPNs
Study design: 254 PV patients (WHO2008 criteria, naïve to cytoreduction or HU pretreated but not resistant) had been randomized to receive Ropeg or HU in the PROUD-PV study. After 12 months of treatment patients were rolled over to the CONTI-PV study: 95 of 106 (89.6%) patients completing the 12-month Ropeg arm, and 76 of 111 (68.5%) patients completing the 12-month HU arm continued in the second year. The latter cohort was also allowed to switch from the HU regimen to best available therapy (BAT) at the investigators discretion; a cross-over between groups was not allowed. Efficacy assessment consisted of complete hematological response (CHR) rate according to ELN criteria, and the CHR rate plus symptom improvement (PV-related symptoms and signs including clinically significant splenomegaly). Secondary endpoints included the effect of treatment on mutant JAK2 allele burden assessed as rate of molecular response (modified ELN criteria) as surrogate for disease modification.
Results: 88 (Ropeg) and 73 (HU/BAT) patients completed the 24-month efficacy analysis time point, the mean treatment duration for safety analysis was 2.7 years (both after initial randomization in the PROUD study). Median drug doses in the second year remained at the same level as during the first year: 450 µg Ropeg every 2 weeks and 1000 mg HU per day. In the HU/BAT arm over 98% of patients remained treated with HU, a switch to other BAT was rare. Discontinuation rates during the second year were comparable with 8.4% in the Ropeg and 6.6% in the HU/BAT arm, respectively.
At 24 months, treatment with Ropeg achieved a high CHR rate of 70.5%. This was significantly better than a CHR of 49.3% with HU/BAT, (p=0.0101, full-analysis-set). Importantly, in contrast to HU/BAT, response rates increased steadily in the Ropeg-treated group throughout the two-year treatment period. The composite endpoint CHR plus symptom improvement also favored Ropeg with 49.5% vs. 36.6% for HU/BAT (p=0.1183) at 24 months. The advantage of Ropeg was most pronounced in the effect on mutant JAK2 allele burden: at 24 months 69.6% of patients in the Ropeg arm but only 28.6% in the HU/BAT arm had achieved partial molecular response (p=0.0046).
Regarding safety, a comparable number of patients (70.1% for Ropeg, 77.2% for HU) experienced treatment-related adverse events. Anemia, thrombocytopenia and leukopenia occurred more frequently with HU, whereas GGT increase was observed only with Ropeg in some patients. Events of special interest for the class of IFNa (in particular thyroid disorders and depression) were below 5% in the Ropeg arm. Disease- or treatment-related secondary malignancies occurred only in the HU cohort, including 2 cases of acute leukemia, 1 melanoma and 2 basaliomas, whereas in the Ropeg cohort 3 malignancies (glioblastoma, seminoma, adrenal neoplasm) - most likely unrelated to IFNa treatment - were reported.
Conclusions: These data confirm a) the high and durable hematologic response and symptom improvement achieved with Ropeg, b) the excellent safety and tolerability profile of Ropeg, and c) the disease modification capability of Ropeg suggested by its ability to significantly reduce the mutant JAK2 allelic burden. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b will provide a valuable and safe new long-term treatment option for PV patients.
Disclosures: Gisslinger: Shire: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; PharmaEssentia: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG: Consultancy, Honoraria. Georgiev: Alnylam: Consultancy. Mayer: Eisai: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hasselbalch: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AOR Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kiladjian: AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
See more of: Myeloproliferative Syndromes: Clinical
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts