-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

812 A Prospective Randomised Trial of Targeted Therapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Based upon Real-Time Gene Expression Profiling: The Remodl-B Study of the UK NCRI and SAKK Lymphoma Groups (ISRCTN51837425)

Lymphoma: Chemotherapy, excluding Pre-Clinical Models
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Type: Oral
Session: 623. Lymphoma: Chemotherapy, excluding Pre-Clinical Models: DLBCL – Beyond R-CHOP
Monday, December 7, 2015: 4:45 PM
Tangerine 3 (WF3-4), Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Andrew J Davies, MRCP PhD1*, Josh Caddy2*, Tom Maishman2*, Sharon Barrans, PhD3*, Christoph Mamot, MD4*, Matthew Care, PhD5*, Christopher Pocock6, Louise Stanton, PhD2*, Debbie Hamid2*, Keith Pugh, PhD2*, Andrew McMillan, PhD7, Paul Fields, MD PhD8, Anton Kruger9*, Andrew Jack, PhD, MB10 and Peter W.M. Johnson, FRCP1

1Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
2Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
3St James Institute of Oncology, HMDS, Leeds, United Kingdom
4Kantonsspital Aarau AG, Aarau, Switzerland
5University of Leeds, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Leeds, United Kingdom
6East Kent Hospitals, Canterbury, United Kingdom
7Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
8Department of Haematology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
9Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, United Kingdom
10HMDS, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom

Introduction: DLBCL subtypes may be classified by gene expression corresponding to germinal centre (GCB) or activated peripheral blood (ABC) B-cells. Treatment outcomes with R-CHOP therapy were inferior for ABCs in retrospective series, and this study investigated whether adding bortezomib could reverse the adverse prognosis.  The trial used gene expression profiling (GEP) to stratify cases, with adaptive design to analyse the outcome by subtypes at predefined timepoints.


Methods:
Newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL underwent staging and commenced standard R-CHOP. During cycle 1, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue was used to extract messenger RNA for GEP using the Illumina DASL array platform. Cases were allocated to GCB, ABC or Unclassifiable (Unc) type before starting cycle 2, using an established algorithm based upon 20 genes.  Patients with successful GEP were randomised 1:1 to receive R-CHOP +/- bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 s/c on days 1+8 in cycles 2–6. The study was powered to detect a difference in progression-free survival (PFS) of 10% with bortezomib, with a 2-sided significance, 5% and 90% power. The adaptive design allowed for closure of randomization for GCB cases if 1-year PFS was <70% after 55 received RB-CHOP (interim safety analysis) or if 1-year PFS was <85% after 73 received RB-CHOP and followed for 1 year (futility analysis).

 

Results: Between 6/2011 and 5/2015 1132 patients were enrolled from 109 sites, with 1078 samples analysed. Of these, 157 (15%) biopsies had inadequate material for GEP, but the remaining 921 were classified as 246 (27%) ABC, 476 (52%) GCB and 199 (22%) Unc. Successful classification was possible from both surgical and needle core biopsies. Median laboratory turnaround time was 12 working days and all results were available prior to the scheduled administration of cycle 2. Characteristics of the patients of different subtypes are shown in the table. Following both interim analyses the DMEC recommended continued recruitment of patients with a GCB phenotype.

 

ABC

GCB

Unc

Age (years): median

67

63

63

Age (years) : range

23 to 86

20 to 82

20 to 85

% performance status 0-1

88

88

90

% at least one extranodal site

53

54

62

% bone marrow involved

15

14

23

% LDH>ULN

69

76

79

% IPI score 0/1

29

27

26

% IPI score 2/3

57

55

55

% IPI score 4/5

15

19

19

% B symptoms

46

43

49

% Bulk>10cm

17

26

21

Conclusions: This study has demonstrated the feasibility of GEP at diagnosis to subsequently guide therapy in a large multicentre trial. Although patients with ABC type lymphoma were in general slightly older, they did not appear to have other adverse prognostic features at diagnosis vs GCB. All patients will have completed therapy by the time of the meeting, allowing the initial response and toxicity data to be available for presentation.

Disclosures: Davies: GIlead: Consultancy , Honoraria , Research Funding ; Mundipharma: Honoraria , Research Funding ; CTI: Honoraria ; Takeda: Honoraria , Research Funding ; Bayer: Research Funding ; GSK: Research Funding ; Janssen: Honoraria , Research Funding ; Roche: Honoraria , Research Funding ; Pfizer: Honoraria ; Celgene: Honoraria , Research Funding . Off Label Use: The addition of bortezomib to R-CHOP chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Pocock: Janssen: Honoraria . Jack: Jannsen: Research Funding . Johnson: Takeda: Honoraria ; Pfizer: Honoraria ; Janssen: Research Funding .

*signifies non-member of ASH