Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 624. Lymphoma: Therapy with Biologic Agents, excluding Pre-Clinical Models: Poster II
This post hoc analysis evaluated efficacy and safety in pts with SLL who were treated with IDL in Study 02 or Study 09.
Methods: Eligible pts with SLL included those with R/R disease treated with IDL-mono across 7 dose cohorts in Study 02, and those with double-refractory disease (to both rituximab and an alkylating agent) treated with IDL-mono in Study 09. The primary objectives for Study 02 were to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of IDL in pts with R/R hematologic malignancies. The primary objectives for Study 09 were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IDL in pts with R/R B-cell iNHL. In both studies, IDL was continued until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical response was assessed with the use of standard criteria for lymphoma (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:579-586).
Results: A total of 39 pts with R/R SLL participated in the 2 trials. Study 02 enrolled 11 pts, (5 on IDL doses ˂100 mg BID; 6 on IDL doses ˃100 mg BID). Study 09 enrolled 28 pts who received IDL 150 mg BID.
Enrolled pts (Study 02 and Study 09) had a median age of 69 and 65 years [range 34-87], and 73% and 75% were male, respectively. In both studies, 82% of pts presented with Ann Arbor Stage IV disease at baseline and had received a median of 4 prior regimens [range 1-9]. In Study 02, 9 of the 11 pts (82%) had refractory disease; all 11 pts had received prior regimens containing fludarabine. In Study 09, 27 of the 28 pts (96%) were refractory to both rituximab and an alkylating agent; common previous therapy included: 28/28 rituximab, 25/28 cyclophosphamide, 21/28 bendamustine, 19/28 vincristine, and 18/28 fludarabine.
The clinical response rate by dose cohort is presented in Table 1. In Study 02 and Study 09, overall response rates (ORR) were 6/11 (55%) and 17/28 (61%), respectively; median time to minor or first response was 0.9 months and 1.9 months; median duration of response (DOR) was 2.3 months and 12.5 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months and 11.4 months, respectively. In Study 02, the most common Grade ≥3 adverse events included febrile neutropenia 3/11, and neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, pneumonia, and streptococcal bacteremia (each 2/11). In Study 09, the most common Grade ≥3 adverse events included neutropenia 8/28, pneumonia 7/28, and diarrhea 4/28.
Transient lymphocytosis occurred with IDL-mono, similar to other B-cell receptor targeted therapies. In Study 02, time to peak occurred at 4.1 weeks with a median ALC of 4.98x10ˆ9/L (361% above baseline); time to nadir occurred at 8.0 weeks with a median ALC of 1.9x10ˆ9/L. In Study 09, time to peak occurred at 6.1 weeks with a median ALC of 6.2x10ˆ9/L (426% above baseline); Time to nadir occurred at 11.1 weeks with a median ALC of 1.3x10ˆ9/L.
Conclusions: This pooled subset analysis suggests IDL-mono provides substantial clinical activity in the subset of pts with R/R SLL. IDL had a manageable safety profile in the SLL population subset. Confirmatory phase 3 clinical trials of IDL with combination therapy are in progress for pts with iNHL, including those with SLL. Clinical trial information: NCT01732913 and NCT01732926.
Table 1: Clinical Response Rate by Dose Cohort for Patients with SLL
|
Study 02 (n=11) |
Study 09 (n=28)* |
|
|||||||
Outcome, n |
50 mg BID x 28 Days (n=2) |
150 mg QD x 28 Days (n=1) |
150 mg BID x 21 Days (n=2) |
300 mg QD x 28 Days (n=0) |
100 mg BID x 28 Days (n=1) |
150 mg BID x 28 Days (n=2) |
200 mg BID x 28 Days (n=1) |
350 mg BID x 28 Days (n=2) |
150mg BID (n=28) |
|
ORR |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
17 (61%) |
|
CR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 (4%) |
|
PR |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
16 (57%) |
|
MR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
SD |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 (36%) |
|
PD |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
NE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 (4%) |
*IRC Assessment
Disclosures: Gopal: Gilead, Spectrum, Pfizer, Janssen, Seattle Genetics: Consultancy ; Millennium, Seattle Genetics, Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria ; Spectrum, Pfizer, BioMarin, Cephalon/Teva, Emergent/Abbott. Gilead, Janssen., Merck, Milennium, Piramal, Seattle Genetics, Giogen Idec, BMS: Research Funding . Davies: Gilead: Honoraria , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding . Flinn: Cephalon, Inc; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd; Genentech, inc; Gilead: Research Funding . Ghia: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy ; Roche: Consultancy , Research Funding ; Janssen: Consultancy ; Acerta Pharma BV: Research Funding ; AbbVie: Consultancy ; Adaptive: Consultancy ; Gilead: Consultancy , Research Funding , Speakers Bureau ; GSK: Research Funding . Goy: Celgene: Consultancy , Research Funding , Speakers Bureau ; Allos, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Genentech, and Millennium. Gilead: Speakers Bureau . Salles: Celgene Corporation; Roche and Gilead Sciences: Research Funding ; Calistoga Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Celgene Corporation; Genentech, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceutica Products, L.P.; Roche: Consultancy ; Celgene Corporation; Roche: Speakers Bureau . Abella: Gilead: Employment . Philip: Gilead: Employment . Sorenson: Gilead: Employment . Wagner-Johnston: Celgene: Research Funding ; Gilead: Consultancy .
See more of: Lymphoma: Therapy with Biologic Agents, excluding Pre-Clinical Models
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts
*signifies non-member of ASH