-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

3760 Re-Induction Outcome for Pediatric Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortium

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Therapy, excluding Transplantation
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 614. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Therapy, excluding Transplantation: Poster III
Monday, December 7, 2015, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Weili Sun, MD, PhD1, Jemily Malvar, MS2*, Richard Sposto, PhD3*, Anupam Verma, MD4, Jennifer J. Wilkes, MD5, Robyn M. Dennis, MD6*, Kenneth Matthew Heym, MD7*, Elena Eckroth, CCRC2*, Jeannette Vandergiesse, BA, CCRP2*, Paul S. Gaynon, MD1, Alan S. Wayne, MD1 and James A. Whitlock, MD8

1Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
2Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
3Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
4Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
5Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
6Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH
7Cook Children's Hospital, Ft Worth, TX
8Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada

Introduction

Remission induction rates after a second or greater relapse is a critical endpoint in phase II trials of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). A robust benchmark is crucial for identification of novel multi-agent regimens worthy of further study. The Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma (TACL) consortium previously reported the response rates of children with multiply relapsed and refractory (R/R) ALL treated between 1995 and 2004, which provided a benchmark for clinical trials. To define more recent treatment patterns and test the robustness of this benchmark, we performed a retrospective cohort review of children with R/R ALL who experienced second or greater treatment failure at TACL consortium sites between 2005 and 2013.

Patients and Methods

Eligible patients were identified at participating TACL institutions. This cohort was comprised of patients with medullary R/R B-cell precursor ALL who experienced at least 2 treatment failures or relapsed after hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Patient demographic data and details of the initial and R/R disease characteristics were abstracted from medical records and entered into a central database. This study was approved by the IRB of each participating institution.

Treatment failure was defined by the presence or re-emergence of circulating blasts, M2/M3 BM, or extramedullary (EM) disease despite therapy. Complete remission (CR) was defined as M1 marrow, no EM disease and evidence of peripheral count recovery. For the purpose of statistical analysis, patients who met these criteria without platelet recovery (CRp) or normal blood count recovery (CRi) were included as CR. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were utilized to evaluate the risk of re-induction failure. Predictors included in this preliminary analysis were NCI risk criteria at diagnosis, duration of the prior remission, the treatment attempt number, and the EM and BM status at the start of each therapy attempt.

Results

This report includes 214 patients. Fifty-six percent were male. At initial diagnosis, 32% were at least 10 years old, 26% had initial white blood cell (WBC) counts over 50,000/µL, and 39% were classified as high risk by the NCI risk criteria (Table 1). Therapy involved various combinations of agents and ranged between 2 and 10 attempts. The CR rate was 42% for third treatment attempt and 24% for fourth and subsequent treatment attempts (Table 2). Treatment failures were significantly associated with increased number of treatment attempts (p < 0.001), shorter duration of previous CR (p < 0.001) and NCI risk category at diagnosis (p = 0.018).

Conclusion

This preliminary analysis found similar CR rates in patients with third treatment failure compared to the 1st TACL retrospective study of the prior decade (42% vs. 44%, Ko et al, 2010) and an Austrian report with a small cohort of patients (Reismüller et al, 2013). Further analysis will be performed in comparison to the initial TACL retrospective study cohort once enrollment to this study has been completed (approximately 400 patients). A robust, contemporary historical control may serve as an alternative to a randomized control when outcome with past therapies in unacceptably poor.

Table 1. Patient Characteristics at Initial Diagnosis of Patients with ALL who received at least two treatment attempt (n = 214 patients)

Characteristic

No of patients

%

Age, years

< 1 (infants)

18

8

1-9

126

59

10 and over

70

33

WBC count/uL

< 50K

128

60

50K and over

56

26

Unknown

30

14

NCI risk criteria at diagnosis

Non-infants, standard risk

82

38

Non-infants, high risk

84

39

Non-infants, unknown

30

14

Infants

18

8

Sex

Female

94

44

Male

120

56

CNS disease

Yes

42

20

No

148

69

Unknown

24

11

Karyotype1

Normal

68

30

11q23 (MLL gene) rearranged

19

8

Hypodiploidy

7

3

Hyperdiploidy

26

12

iAMP21

2

1

t(12;21)

6

3

t(1;19)

7

3

t(9;22)

15

7

Other

46

21

Unknown

28

12

1 Karyotype is available for 214 unique patients; 2 entries were reported for 7 patients, and 4 entries were reported for 1 patient.

Table 2 Achievement of CR/CRp/CRi After Treatment of R/R ALL by Preceding Remission Duration and Treatment Attempt

Third treatment

attempt

Fourth through tenth treatment attempt

Duration of preceding CR

Response

Total

%

Response

Total

%

     Not achieved (refractory)

24

63

38

20

86

23

     < 18 months duration

28

78

36

11

49

22

     18 to 36 months duration

9

15

60

3

5

60

     ≥ 36 months duration

8

8

100

0

1

0

All patients combined

69

164

42

34

141

24

Disclosures: Sun: Gateway for Cancer Researchy: Research Funding ; Amgen: Research Funding . Wilkes: Healthcare Research and Quality: Research Funding ; Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation: Research Funding . Gaynon: Bristol Meyers Squibb: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees ; Sigma Tau: Speakers Bureau ; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau . Wayne: Medimmune: Honoraria , Other: travel support , Research Funding ; NIH: Patents & Royalties ; Kite Pharma: Honoraria , Other: travel support ; Pfizer: Honoraria ; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria , Other: travel support , Research Funding . Whitlock: Amgen: Honoraria .

*signifies non-member of ASH